Random pictures thread!

[Boomerang]

[themadscientist]

Not necessary for me. If I'm not at fault, I don't apologize.

[Boomerang]

Originally Posted by themadscientist

Not necessary for me. If I'm not at fault, I don't apologize.

But if you did, it wouldn't stand up in court as admission of guilt

[WingZer0]

[finch1750]

Originally Posted by themadscientist

Not necessary for me. If I'm not at fault, I don't apologize.

You're not Canadian

[Tcoat]

Originally Posted by Boomerang

But if you did, it wouldn't stand up in court as admission of guilt

Apology Act, 2009
S.O. 2009, CHAPTER 3
Consolidation Period: From April 23, 2009 to the e-Laws currency date.
No Amendments.
Definition

1. In this Act,
“apology” means an expression of sympathy or regret, a statement that a person is sorry or any other words or actions indicating contrition or commiseration, whether or not the words or actions admit fault or liability or imply an admission of fault or liability in connection with the matter to which the words or actions relate. 2009, c. 3, s. 1.
Effect of apology on liability

2. (1) An apology made by or on behalf of a person in connection with any matter,
(a) does not, in law, constitute an express or implied admission of fault or liability by the person in connection with that matter;
(b) does not, despite any wording to the contrary in any contract of insurance or indemnity and despite any other Act or law, void, impair or otherwise affect any insurance or indemnity coverage for any person in connection with that matter; and
(c) shall not be taken into account in any determination of fault or liability in connection with that matter. 2009, c. 3, s. 2 (1).
Exception

(2) Clauses (1) (a) and (c) do not apply for the purposes of proceedings under the Provincial Offences Act. 2009, c. 3, s. 2 (2).
Evidence of apology not admissible

(3) Despite any other Act or law, evidence of an apology made by or on behalf of a person in connection with any matter is not admissible in any civil proceeding, administrative proceeding or arbitration as evidence of the fault or liability of any person in connection with that matter. 2009, c. 3, s. 2 (3).
Exception

(4) However, if a person makes an apology while testifying at a civil proceeding, including while testifying at an out of court examination in the context of the civil proceeding, at an administrative proceeding or at an arbitration, this section does not apply to the apology for the purposes of that proceeding or arbitration. 2009, c. 3, s. 2 (4).
Criminal or provincial offence proceeding or conviction

3. Nothing in this Act affects,
(a) the admissibility of any evidence in,
(i) a criminal proceeding, including a prosecution for perjury, or
(ii) a proceeding under the Provincial Offences Act; or
(b) the use that may be made in the proceedings referred to in subsection 2 (3) of a conviction for a criminal or provincial offence. 2009, c. 3, s. 3.
Acknowledgment, Limitations Act, 2002

4. For the purposes of section 13 of the Limitations Act, 2002, nothing in this Act,
(a) affects whether an apology constitutes an acknowledgment of liability; or
(b) prevents an apology from being admitted in evidence. 2009, c. 3, s. 4.
5. Omitted (provides for coming into force of provisions of this Act). 2009, c. 3, s. 5.
6. Omitted (enacts short title of this Act). 2009, c. 3, s. 6.




This is not a uniquely Canadian things folks! Although I have to wonder if it was ever actually used in Texas.
States with Apology Laws:
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Iowa
Indiana
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Missouri
MontanaNebraska
New Hampshire
New Jersey
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wyoming

[Boomerang]

So what goes on in the Canadian mosh pit stays in the mosh pit

Sorry @Tcoat , I'm still upset about the Kangaroo photos

[Tcoat]

Originally Posted by Boomerang

So what goes on in the Canadian mosh pit stays in the mosh pit

Sorry @Tcoat , I'm still upset about the Kangaroo photos

[Boomerang]

[Tcoat]

[Guillaume]

You're welcome, pal.

[finch1750]

Originally Posted by Guillaume

You're welcome, pal.

He really means it after he lost $778mil yesterday

[Guillaume]

Originally Posted by finch1750

He really means it after he lost $778mil yesterday

My thought exactly

[themadscientist]