follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-13-2014, 10:47 AM   #85
Opie
Senior Member
 
Opie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '13 BRZ TLM Spec
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,961
Thanks: 1,612
Thanked 2,325 Times in 1,000 Posts
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trojan_SC View Post
Of course this was a "Tit-for-tat" thing. Why else would they make a car they didn't really want to make in the first place? Toyota got Subaru's resources to build the car (factory, manpower), and Subaru got Toyota's DI technology at their disposal to use for future vehicles (Forester for example)

Subaru was never against this car, there were design & engineering differences along the way as should've been expected, that being said there is a lot of false speculation in this thread. Subaru & Toyota have different car building philosophies, merging those philosophies required compromise. Subaru wanted a 2 door coupe but didn't want to invest the capital to build this car on their own not knowing if it would sell and Toyota could've built this car on their own but think redesigned last gen-Celica.

Subaru had Toyota help them with the DI on the BRZ resulting in a merged (Subaru FI/Toyota DI) system...and from what they learned they designed their own DI used on the new Forester XT, new WRX & STI that are nothing like the DI on the BRZ. In fact, if the BRZ had the Subaru designed DI, it would be a much better car...without the crickets and torque dip...among other things.
__________________
2013 BRZ Premium 6MT - Track Car, 2020 GMC Canyon Denali Duramax - Tow Vehicle, 2021 Forester Sport - Wife's Daily, 2016 Crosstrek - Daughter's Ride and always buying random flips...
Opie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2014, 12:38 PM   #86
meeskee2
Senior Member
 
meeskee2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: World Rally Blue BRZ Limited, MT
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 259
Thanks: 93
Thanked 81 Times in 62 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Time to bust out my favorite emoji...
__________________
- World Rally Blue BRZ | Limited | Manual -

"Some guys think that having a better car makes them better than other guys, and those guys are right." -Top Gear
meeskee2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to meeskee2 For This Useful Post:
SirBrass (02-13-2014)
Old 02-13-2014, 12:52 PM   #87
Boxer486
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: small
Location: here
Posts: 697
Thanks: 195
Thanked 262 Times in 155 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie View Post
Subaru was never against this car....Subaru wanted a 2 door coupe but didn't want to invest the capital to build this car on their own not knowing if it would sell

First off, where is the link proving you are not speculating? Second, this statement sounds like a contradiction. They wanted to build a 2 door coupe but didn't know if it would and didn't have the money.

Subaru had Toyota help them with the DI on the BRZ resulting in a merged (Subaru FI/Toyota DI) system...and from what they learned they designed their own DI used on the new Forester XT, new WRX & STI that are nothing like the DI on the BRZ. In fact, if the BRZ had the Subaru designed DI, it would be a much better car...without the crickets and torque dip...among other things.

Third, the DI on the BRZ is not what Toyota uses either, no Lexus uses these injectors or seals and none of them have a torque dip. Fourth, you're again the one speculating that Subaru's DI would be better on the NA FA20. Especially since they didn't have one prior, so not sure how that even comes to fruition. Also, the cricket thing is pure typical Subaru vendor quality all the way, no ifs, ands or buts about it.

The number of people that praise Subaru for the good things about the 86 and the number of people that bash Toyota for problems with the 86 are telling of inherent fanboy bias. If anyone thinks a Japanese made Subaru is more refined and reliable than a Japanese made Toyota, they are simply ill informed. People that have owned both know better.
.
Boxer486 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2014, 01:29 PM   #88
JS + BRZ
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: 2010 MS3
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,820
Thanks: 1,180
Thanked 1,161 Times in 597 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Will probably get very little more power. It's very hard to get more out of this 2.0 NA anyway.

If anything, they will come out with STi variant which will be boosted and have about +$7k higher sticker price which is in line with WRX/STI pricing strategy.

Maybe it's just me, but I'm quite satisfied with the power my BRZ has at the moment. I'm sure I would want some more once my driver mod gets upgraded.
JS + BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2014, 03:44 PM   #89
lazee
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: e92 m3 6mt
Location: SoCal
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
i'll just leave this here
http://blog.caranddriver.com/subaru-...o-stop-asking/
lazee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lazee For This Useful Post:
airjonny (05-22-2014)
Old 03-07-2014, 09:01 AM   #90
Opie
Senior Member
 
Opie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '13 BRZ TLM Spec
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,961
Thanks: 1,612
Thanked 2,325 Times in 1,000 Posts
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxer486 View Post
First off, where is the link proving you are not speculating?

Subaru doesn't publish internal memo's to the internet.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxer486 View Post
Second, this statement sounds like a contradiction. They wanted to build a 2 door coupe but didn't know if it would and didn't have the money.


Subaru has wanted another 2 door coupe since the Impreza coupe was discontinued. And has offered several 2 door concept cars over the years since but never committed the money or engineering to actually build one. With Toyota sharing the development costs it was beneficial for both companies, but not without compromise on both sides as well.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxer486 View Post
Third, the DI on the BRZ is not what Toyota uses either, no Lexus uses these injectors or seals and none of them have a torque dip.

All later-model Lexus engine's ending with FSE use a similar dual-injection system like the D4-S found in the twins, it is used for emissions, drivability and to reduce carbon buildup. The twins were just the first to implement it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxer486 View Post
Fourth, you're again the one speculating that Subaru's DI would be better on the NA FA20. Especially since they didn't have one prior, so not sure how that even comes to fruition.

Since it doesn't exist on the FA20 you are correct it is speculation. But considering that Subaru's DI on the 2014 Forester XT is better, I would surmise that it would be just as good on the twins as well. You should go drive one and see for yourself, or the 2015 WRX/STI when they hit dealers next month. I have, and all have much better DI systems in both engineering and driving characteristics than the twins.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxer486 View Post
Also, the cricket thing is pure typical Subaru vendor quality all the way, no ifs, ands or buts about it.

That is funny since the HPFP is a Lexus (Toyota) sourced part that is also having chirping issues on the Lexus' it is now used on.
__________________
2013 BRZ Premium 6MT - Track Car, 2020 GMC Canyon Denali Duramax - Tow Vehicle, 2021 Forester Sport - Wife's Daily, 2016 Crosstrek - Daughter's Ride and always buying random flips...
Opie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2014, 09:08 AM   #91
raven1231
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 Firestorm FR-S, 2016 DGM WRX
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,580
Thanks: 8,264
Thanked 3,118 Times in 1,667 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Why do we have these threads? More so why do we have 15 different versions of it? Anything mentioned in any of these holds zero value and is 100% speculation.
raven1231 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to raven1231 For This Useful Post:
rick s (03-07-2014)
Old 03-07-2014, 11:10 AM   #92
Boxer486
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: small
Location: here
Posts: 697
Thanks: 195
Thanked 262 Times in 155 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie View Post
Subaru doesn't publish internal memo's to the internet.

Such a statement doesn't help your case does it?

Subaru has wanted another 2 door coupe since the Impreza coupe was discontinued. And has offered several 2 door concept cars over the years since but never committed the money or engineering to actually build one. With Toyota sharing the development costs it was beneficial for both companies, but not without compromise on both sides as well.

I'm sure they were thinking of a low CoG, 2-door RWD lightweight coupe just like the Impreza coupe. Oh wait, that would be more like the AE86, not the Impreza. That's a Toyota vehicle fyi.

All later-model Lexus engine's ending with FSE use a similar dual-injection system like the D4-S found in the twins, it is used for emissions, drivability and to reduce carbon buildup. The twins were just the first to implement it.

You skipped over or are simply unaware of the fact that the point was Lexus DI injectors are NOT the same as the ones on the 86, they have an extra seal for starters. Dual injection wasn't the point and you are obfuscating the original argument. You are actually quite wrong to say the twins were the first to use it as well. You've really missed the boat on that claim.

Since it doesn't exist on the FA20 you are correct it is speculation. But considering that Subaru's DI on the 2014 Forester XT is better, I would surmise that it would be just as good on the twins as well. You should go drive one and see for yourself, or the 2015 WRX/STI when they hit dealers next month. I have, and all have much better DI systems in both engineering and driving characteristics than the twins.

The XT, WRX and STI are all turbocharged and are using appropriate tunes to the task. That tells you nothing at all about which has a better DI system. They are all getting worse MPG too even using a CVT. If you don't like the FA20 tune, go change it as many on this forum have. Don't pretend to know the Subaru DI system is better when you aren't even making a proper comparison. I also don't need to drive any Subaru to know from experience that the DI system on any Lexus 2GRFSE or 1URFSE smokes anything from FHI. You should test drive those, they don't have turbo lag.

That is funny since the HPFP is a Lexus (Toyota) sourced part that is also having chirping issues on the Lexus' it is now used on.
Got a link? I can't seem to find these Lexus crickets you mention. I'll make sure to ask my friend who is a Lexus Master Tech what he's heard about that.
Boxer486 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2014, 11:56 AM   #93
gt8613
I dream of BRZ
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Prospective BRZ owner.
Location: Home.
Posts: 548
Thanks: 615
Thanked 84 Times in 66 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DylanFRS View Post
The problem with the "more powa" thing is that for a long time there has been a handful of enthusiasts (us) that wanted a cool, lightweight, RWD, sports car that we could afford. Something like an MX-5 but better looking and more practical. We would even say things like "It's okay if it doesn't have a ton of power, just make it fun to drive!" The rest of the enthusiasts were perfectly happy with their WRXs, EVOs, turbo'd Hondas, Mustangs, MS3s, S2000s, 350Zs, etc...

Well Toyota came along, and with the help of Subaru, built a car for those of us who had a dream for an affordable, lightweight, RWD coupe...

Unfortunately, it attracted the attention of all of the "other enthusiasts" who decided that it was a great car... if only it had more power. And unfortunately, those people became opinionated and very vocal about our affordable, lightweight, RWD sports car. Suddenly their WRXs and Evos and whatnot, weren't enough for them, they wanted our car... but more like their car...

Now we got the car we wanted, but there is a downside to every happy ending, and that is that we have to deal with them...

The End.

They are jealous that his car garners more attention than theirs and is more of the "pure sports car" than theirs. Then they want that 300 hp engine cause their fat cars can't speed up without them nor can any one of them actually drive and so they know nothing about twists and turns and handling. Now they think anything sub-300 hp and more than 5 secs in a straight line is slow.
gt8613 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2014, 06:11 PM   #94
Darkrune
Senior Member
 
Darkrune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 2017 86
Location: Florida
Posts: 251
Thanks: 36
Thanked 52 Times in 41 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DylanFRS View Post
The problem with the "more powa" thing is that for a long time there has been a handful of enthusiasts (us) that wanted a cool, lightweight, RWD, sports car that we could afford. Something like an MX-5 but better looking and more practical. We would even say things like "It's okay if it doesn't have a ton of power, just make it fun to drive!" The rest of the enthusiasts were perfectly happy with their WRXs, EVOs, turbo'd Hondas, Mustangs, MS3s, S2000s, 350Zs, etc...

Well Toyota came along, and with the help of Subaru, built a car for those of us who had a dream for an affordable, lightweight, RWD coupe...

Unfortunately, it attracted the attention of all of the "other enthusiasts" who decided that it was a great car... if only it had more power. And unfortunately, those people became opinionated and very vocal about our affordable, lightweight, RWD sports car. Suddenly their WRXs and Evos and whatnot, weren't enough for them, they wanted our car... but more like their car...

Now we got the car we wanted, but there is a downside to every happy ending, and that is that we have to deal with them...

The End.
I actually dumped my evo X for the brz because it was so much more fun.
Darkrune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2014, 11:56 PM   #95
jkonquer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2005 Subaru STI
Location: Socal
Posts: 418
Thanks: 4
Thanked 73 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I believe neither company ever raised the hp on their same model vehicle. But both did changed very minor things like bumper, headlamp, badging, stereo, and etc, but overall design and power output stayed the same. In subaru's case they did manage to upgrade the engine efficiency by using variable valve timing, more efficient turbo, and lot of emission changes in the past. Again, never bumped the power output. Although newer engines made substantial hp over older engine when tuned.
I can see the same thing happening for brz and frs.
__________________
jkonquer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2014, 12:33 AM   #96
SirBrass
Trust me, I'm the Doctor
 
SirBrass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 2019 WRX Limited (WRB)
Location: North East PA
Posts: 2,723
Thanks: 4,304
Thanked 1,251 Times in 781 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sport-Tech View Post
There's a thread over in the FR-S section that links to an article in which Tada talks about a coming power boost for the 86:


Likelihood of whatever is decided upon making it to the BRZ? My guess is it's very high. Certainly won't be buying a 2014 now, and might hold off on that C7 I've been speccing....
Short version: no, and not the 2016 or 17 models either. Maybe the '18 if they're going to at all, but that's it.

Don't expect factory FI either.

On phone I am. Therefore, if mistakes I make, Frank Oz blame you should.
__________________
Subies Of Blessed Memory: '05 Forester, '08 WRX, '13 STi
Daily Driver: 2014 BRZ 6MT Limited


^GT5 Replay Photo Mode^
SirBrass is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SirBrass For This Useful Post:
OICU812 (03-09-2014)
Old 05-16-2014, 03:47 PM   #97
Sleeperz
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: 1982 Toyota Corolla Coupe SR5
Location: GVRD
Posts: 104
Thanks: 5
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
There are various speculations about the future of the Scion brand. But it seems that the future will be brighter for the Toyota’s Scion division. It is recently reported that the Scion division of Toyota will create a 4-door saloon car and launched it as the 2016 FR-S car.

http://2015toyotalexus.com/2016-scion-fr-s/

The engine that will be installed is the 2.5-liter that will be powered by 250 horses, a transmission that will carry a six-speed automatic.

http://www.2015bestcarsreviews.com/2...-release-date/


fwiw

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirBrass View Post
Short version: no, and not the 2016 or 17 models either. Maybe the '18 if they're going to at all, but that's it.

Don't expect factory FI either.

On phone I am. Therefore, if mistakes I make, Frank Oz blame you should.
Sleeperz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2014, 10:51 PM   #98
johnnyfast11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: none yet
Location: Houston
Posts: 187
Thanks: 42
Thanked 67 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
seriously. delete or close this thread.
johnnyfast11 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to johnnyfast11 For This Useful Post:
SirBrass (05-21-2014)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vortech Supercharging System Update - More boost, more POWER! Brian@Vortech Forced Induction 337 03-12-2016 03:42 PM
Toyota 86 to get power boost with 2015 refresh Mim Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 296 01-27-2014 10:56 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.