follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-14-2016, 06:27 PM   #1
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,522
Thanks: 8,911
Thanked 14,166 Times in 6,828 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
CSG Mike's 2017 Baseline dynos

I did some dynoing on both ACN 91 and VP 101 unleaded.

Even after multiple pulls, there was very little power difference between the two fuels. With the early pulls on 101, the ECU attempted to advance timing slightly, and ended up sending knock and sent the advance multiplier down, actually resulting in lower numbers on 101 for quite a while, before getting back up to 91 levels.

Also, on 91, 4 pulls were needed to stabilize the output; the ECU was dumping a ton of fuel up top initially. Each successive pull resulted in the ECU dumping fuel later, until it wasn't dumping fuel at all.

This is the same dyno all the CSG Ace header dynos are performed on; a 2013 dynoed about 165whp here.

I'm tempted to see how long the power carries with a higher redline...





CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
Celica00 (10-21-2016), DarkSunrise (10-15-2016), FRS Justin (10-14-2016), Gabzor (10-17-2016), lamawithonel (10-14-2016), Lonewolf (10-14-2016), Manic (10-14-2016), Mim (10-17-2016), SuperDave (10-14-2016), Teseo (10-14-2016), whataboutbob (10-17-2016)
Old 10-14-2016, 09:36 PM   #2
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,522
Thanks: 8,911
Thanked 14,166 Times in 6,828 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTU_drCNV6I"]2017 Subaru BRZ 6MT baseline dyno - YouTube[/ame]

iphone7 audio doesn't capture the actual exhaust note at all....
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
Calum (10-15-2016), dphan (10-17-2016), slava (10-19-2016), Teseo (10-15-2016)
Old 10-14-2016, 09:56 PM   #3
The Racers Line
 
The Racers Line's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: FRS, Supra, Colorado D, GLC63
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,515 Times in 532 Posts
Mentioned: 111 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Sweet! What exhaust did you put on it already?
The Racers Line is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2016, 10:05 PM   #4
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Yes the ecu software logic in the 2017 model is new and different to previous model (manuals only the auto appears to be same old logic), their are now two fueling and timing maps. Not sure how the ecu interpolates between the two sets of maps.

The OL fueling maps are even richer than previous stock tunes some areas targeting down to 10.3 afr where the older ecu maps were 10.7

New pi\di ratios with 20 to 30% port injection being used all the time at high load unlike previous mapping with 100% di between 2800 and 4800 or so.

new cam timing maps with addition rows in rpm axis assume for finer control of cam timing

different beast

Last edited by steve99; 10-15-2016 at 05:24 PM.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
akyp (10-15-2016), Calum (10-15-2016), Createddeleted (10-17-2016), DAEMANO (10-17-2016), deejaylew (10-15-2016), FRS Justin (10-15-2016), Teseo (10-15-2016)
Old 10-15-2016, 08:44 PM   #5
troek
Senior Member
 
troek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2012 Toyota 86
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,294
Thanks: 333
Thanked 396 Times in 285 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
is that AFR hovering around 13 at WOT?
troek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2016, 01:19 AM   #6
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,522
Thanks: 8,911
Thanked 14,166 Times in 6,828 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by troek View Post
is that AFR hovering around 13 at WOT?
Yes; it is far, far more stable than the earlier cars.

I would even tentatively say it's safe to track on the stock tune, with an oil cooler!

The oil cooler, is a completely different story.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
troek (10-17-2016)
Old 10-17-2016, 05:31 AM   #7
JDM4E
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: Honda Accord Euro
Location: Europe
Posts: 204
Thanks: 251
Thanked 54 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Shouldn't you be tuned if using racing petrol for it?
It would be interesting to see classic shit vs best public petrol dynos. Usually then the difference is seen on stock ECU.
JDM4E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2016, 06:35 AM   #8
guybo
Huge E85 fan!
 
guybo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: 2016 Scion FRS
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 1,850
Thanks: 539
Thanked 1,010 Times in 605 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
So the verdict is that the 17 is putting out about 5HP and 5Tq (at peak) more than the first gen? So the literature on the new engine is right? The power curve looks a lot like the old power curve, just shifted up some and with higher AFR.

Thanks for the info!
guybo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2016, 11:39 AM   #9
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,522
Thanks: 8,911
Thanked 14,166 Times in 6,828 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDM4E View Post
Shouldn't you be tuned if using racing petrol for it?
It would be interesting to see classic shit vs best public petrol dynos. Usually then the difference is seen on stock ECU.
The ECU attempted to add timing automatically, sensed knock, and de-incremented the advance multiplier.

More pulls brought it back up to 91 levels, but not significantly more.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2016, 03:41 PM   #10
stevo585
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: White 2014 BRZ
Location: Orlando, FL.
Posts: 519
Thanks: 131
Thanked 155 Times in 109 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by troek View Post
is that AFR hovering around 13 at WOT?
Isn't that a bit too lean? I believe I run in the lower 12.x afr @ 24 degrees peak. Of course I'm tuned though.
__________________
JDL Turbo kit - Ecutek, HRI tuned.
stevo585 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2016, 03:43 PM   #11
stevo585
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: White 2014 BRZ
Location: Orlando, FL.
Posts: 519
Thanks: 131
Thanked 155 Times in 109 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
Yes; it is far, far more stable than the earlier cars.

I would even tentatively say it's safe to track on the stock tune, with an oil cooler!

The oil cooler, is a completely different story.
Isn't that a bit too lean? I believe I run in the lower 12.x afr @ 24 degrees peak before the ESC was installed. Of course I'm tuned though.
__________________
JDL Turbo kit - Ecutek, HRI tuned.
stevo585 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2016, 08:22 PM   #12
djliquidsteele
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 498
Thanks: 62
Thanked 130 Times in 92 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo585 View Post
Isn't that a bit too lean? I believe I run in the lower 12.x afr @ 24 degrees peak before the ESC was installed. Of course I'm tuned though.
I see you're on E85 which needs to run richer than gasoline. I'm no expert but you may actually be running a bit lean. I thought E85 was supposed to be like 11.5:1. Gasoline stoichiometry is about 14.7:1.
djliquidsteele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2016, 08:59 PM   #13
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,522
Thanks: 8,911
Thanked 14,166 Times in 6,828 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo585 View Post
Isn't that a bit too lean? I believe I run in the lower 12.x afr @ 24 degrees peak before the ESC was installed. Of course I'm tuned though.
It's difficult to make a blanket statement without being able to actually tune the car, but at 13:1, there was zero knocking on ACN91.

Is there more power that can be had running slightly richer? Possibly; we won't know until I can tune the car.

My Honda runs between 13-13.6:1 without knock, and makes optimum power at that AFR. The F22C can already hit MBT, so after optimizing ignition timing and then slightly pulling it back to reduce in-cylinder pressures, AFR was adjusted for maximum output, resulting in a range of 13-13.6 throughout the rev range in open loop.

I suspect the 17 tune wasn't as rushed as the original 13's.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
stevo585 (10-18-2016), wparsons (10-20-2016)
Old 10-17-2016, 09:19 PM   #14
menikmati
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 2015 BRZ, 2005 STI
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 335
Thanks: 228
Thanked 225 Times in 118 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
The ECU attempted to add timing automatically, sensed knock, and de-incremented the advance multiplier.

More pulls brought it back up to 91 levels, but not significantly more.
Decremented?

Sorry, just poking fun at you, Mike.
menikmati is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CSG Mike's personal 2017 BRZ build and thoughts. CSG Mike Member's Car Journals 235 09-09-2019 11:03 PM
Controlling the nannies in 2017 vs. pre 2017 mdm Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 23 10-04-2016 11:11 PM
Baseline Dyno Results JJJ Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 2 06-23-2015 06:49 PM
Baseline Koni settings RTR ? SeanRTR Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 3 07-30-2013 12:58 AM
Pacific Raceways Baseline with FR-S Ishii Motors Northwest 10 06-20-2012 12:34 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.