|
Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86 |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-17-2011, 05:17 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 1993 Impreza w/ WRX Swap + FWD!
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,071
Thanks: 217
Thanked 951 Times in 500 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Of Curb Weights and why this car will not weigh under 2600lbs
We've seen a wide range in curb weights lately from both magazine articles and leaked information.
My goal with this thread is discuss why we are seeing such a wide range in weights this close to the actual debut of the car and why we are seeing the numbers we are seeing. One important thing to realize about this car is that its a Subaru drivetrain chassis for the most part. The suspension bits are almost straight out of the current Impreza's, and the drivetrain minus the front differential and axles is going to be close to the same weight of a Subaru drivetrain. Why does this matter? Because it gives us a good indicator of how much this car will actually weight. Curb weights and Subaru's: I know a few folks here know me from other Subaru forums, but one of things I've done over the years was compile a list of Subaru curb weights for EVERY model sold in the U.S. These numbers were taken from actual service manuals so they were about as accurate as they can get. The lightest AWD Impreza ever sold in the U.S. was the 1993 base model L and that came in at 2500lbs. This was a car that had 14" wheels, NO abs, NO passenger airbag, NO power anything, TINY brakes with drum rear brakes, possibly NO A/C (not sure) and NO options at all possibly not even a stereo (I don't have the exact model details, I need a brochure for that). The lightest model gained weight in 95 up to 2555lbs and in 1996 several reinforcments were added to the chassis along with other component improvements that upped the weight to 2715lbs! Now I also have some European weights, but since they measure curb weights different it is impossible to know if these compare correctly. But in 1993, the lightest AWD model in Europe was 2460lbs but had a smaller motor and probably even less options, and I'm not sure where that number came from, possibly not even service manuals. Important things to note: The EJ engines form this period were SOHC 1.8 or 2.2 motors with MUCH smaller heads (Phase I) and the engine was lighter than later 2.5 SOHC and DOHC motors. PLUS, the rear subframe on these cars was VERY light compared to the Multi-link subframe in the current cars. How do I know this? Well I worked in a Subaru parts department for awhile and had to carry these things around! The multilink subframe is VERY heavy, not including the actual multilink components. Probably 50-75% heavier than the non-multilink subframes. The strut assembly is heavier on the non-multilink rears, but not nearly enough to compensate for the subframe and component weight difference. Comparing to the FT86 chassis: Now I know you might be saying to yourself, "Why are we comparing an AWD car to a RWD car in terms of weight?". Well the important thing to know is that Subaru's AWD is simple and mechanical. If you remove the front axles and front differential, you have a RWD drivetrain. That accounts for ONLY 50lbs or so no more. Yes, there is a center differential but Subaru 5-speed manuals are NOT complicated and not heavy and compared to the 6-speed in the FT86 it will be very comparable on weight probably including the middle AND front differential! Now, how does this matter with the FT86 chassis? Well, we know several things about the FT86 chassis now and what the car will have that will give us an indication of the weight of the vehicle. First, the rear subframe is the same as the current Imprezas. This means the rear suspension is heavier than earlier Imprezas. The front suspension and subframe is an unknown, possibly lighter but supposedly the same engine mount style so probably close to the same. Second, the FT86 engine is heavier. The FB motors gained a little weight over the SOHC EJ25 normally asperated motors due to the use of the timing chain, DOHC and aluminum timing chain cover. Even with the plastic manifold, they are heavier. And the SOHC EJ25's were heavier than earlier Impreza Phase I motors. Thirdly, the FT86 has much larger brakes and wheels than early Imprezas. This will add to the weight even more. Fourthly, the FT86 WILL have between 4 and 7 airbags possibly more. Thats extra weight right there. Even if the radio is optional, the bits and pieces from the FT86 WILL weight more than early Imprezas. Finally, the Chassis... First generation Imprezas were small, very small. The chassis were also developed 20 years ago so they don't have the safety considerations in mind as a current car would have and also don't have the structural rigidity either. Even if they managed to save weight on the FT86, its still going to have as heavy or heavier chassis than a first generation Impreza. Doing the Math: For the purposes of this segment, I'm going to use my 1995 Impreza because its a known quantity (I know what came with the car and what didn't) and I know the curb weight... 1995 L Coupe AWD - 2605lbs (has A/C, small 14" wheels, no ABS or power anything) Here are a list of the things I discussed and how they compare between the older Impreza and the new FT86- Engine - FT86 heavier by ~10-25lbs Transmission - AWD probably heavier, but not much, subtract 50lbs (+10 for 6-speed vs. 5-speed) Front Suspension and Subframe - Probably a wash Rear suspension - FT86 ~25lbs heavier Wheels and tires- FT86 10-20lbs more per wheel, ~40-80lbs Brakes - FT86 5-10lbs heavier each corner, ~20-40lbs ABS - FT86 has it, add ~20-30lbs Airbags - Impreza has 2 vs. 4+ for FT86, add 10-30lbs Interior - Probably a wash (the rear seat only weighs 30lbs on the Impreza and the front seats are not that heavy, the rest of the interior is spartan including bits in the trunk) Chassis - Unknown, close to wash. Impreza has almost zero extra reinforcements Total: FT86 heavier by between ~50 and 230lbs So the FT86 might weight between 2650lbs and 2800lbs+ The bad news: This does line up almost exactly with what we saw from the Toyota leaked brochure weight numbers with the higher weights being determined by content, and the VERY low weight being a base model with steel wheels and unpainted bumpers (and no radio). I highly suspect the final weight is going to be OVER 2700lbs possibly even higher. The ONLY way this won't happen is if the chassis is insanely light, which there is almost zero chance of it weighing less than a 20 year old tiny chassis with no modern structural improvements. The GOOD news!: The good news about this is that weight reduction is EASY for early Imprezas. This will also apply to the FT86 chassis. There are other threads about this, but the easy weight reductions are these: Delete the back seat (~30lbs) Dump the junk in the trunk (~30lbs) Lightweight battery (~15lbs) Lightweight bumper beams (~30lbs) Those are all things I've done with my Impreza for racedays (the bumper beams stay put though) and all things that can easily get the car down to the 2600lbs range or possibly lower if it does turn out that the base models are in the 2600lbs range. Final thoughts: There a lot of people who are going to be upset about the production weight of this car. Its not going to be as light as some of the ridiculously light FWD cars on the market right now (Mazda 2 comes to mind). But this is a RWD car thats not made of exotic lightweight materials and not made 20+ years ago when crash tests and safety standards barely existed. WE SHOULD BE HAPPY that this car will weigh 2800lbs or less and realize that our expectations of a near 2500lbs car are unwarranted and unrealistic. |
11-17-2011, 05:26 PM | #2 |
Hook 'em
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,950
Thanks: 68
Thanked 152 Times in 79 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
You make some pretty compelling points, the majority of which aren't going to be answered until we get actual specs from Toyota or Subaru, or until someone gets their car on a scale. However, I will say that your assumtion that just because the crash standards have become more stringent compared to 20 years ago, that the chassis will have to be heavier, isn't necessarily true. Design and engineering have also come a long way in 20 years and costs for lighter materials have also been reduced as well.
|
11-17-2011, 05:45 PM | #3 |
ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: E36 5.7 V8
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 1,573
Thanks: 194
Thanked 198 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
So, this car has a Impreza rear subframe with double wishbone suspension? Weird.
__________________
I wish I was cool enough to have an FR-S
|
11-17-2011, 05:54 PM | #4 |
Hot Dog
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Nice post, well thought out.
FWIW, the magazine "specs" are simply guesses that haven't been directly refuted by Toyota or Subaru. The leaked datasheet reads 1190Kg [2618 Lb] for the stripped out model, 1210Kg [2662 Lb] for the low-spec, and 1230Kg [2706 Lb] for the high-spec. Who knows if this is dry, wet, "unladen", or something else entirely. I wouldn't be surprised if the cars were slightly more than these quoted weights by the time they hit showroom floors.
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products. |
11-17-2011, 06:00 PM | #5 | |
Registered you sir
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: 99 impreza coupe
Location: DC / CT
Posts: 1,666
Thanks: 259
Thanked 380 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
You forget technological advancements in the past decade have given auto producers the ability to make better parts (lighter) for less. Also the '93 Impreza was designed as a cheap(heavy) econo car, the brz has had lightweight principles in its development since its conception. Final thoughts: You will be wrong, nice try though. |
|
11-17-2011, 06:05 PM | #6 | |
Hot Dog
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Lightweight principles are nice in a boardroom meeting, but when the cash is laid down, parts bit bits get put on and the weight ideals are cast aside.
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products. |
|
11-17-2011, 06:14 PM | #7 |
here, there, any where
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: FR-S SOON!!!
Location: Driver seat
Posts: 287
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
just for kickers lets look at the basics:
battery backseat spare tire if there is one that is at least 50lbs right there between 2600-2700 is fine with me. I guess extrem guys will get down to 2400ish but then all the comforts are gone and the car is just a shell. |
11-17-2011, 06:46 PM | #8 |
2 wheel member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: JZA80, 997.1, Taco
Location: SoCal->NorCal
Posts: 4,330
Thanks: 1,318
Thanked 938 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Well it is called Fuji Heavy Industries for a reason! I wonder if it was a Toyota chassis and Toyota engine, how much different would it weigh?
Although Insideline's weight checked in at 2822 on the pre-production, we'll have to see what the final production will tip the scales at. The US versions will more than likely be heavier too.
__________________
|
11-17-2011, 06:51 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: GT3RS, A3 tdi ,Ducati 998, HD FLSTN
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 33
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
If a usdm Elise with fiberglass body, bonded aluminum chassis, vacuum formed plastic cockpit, no carpet, go kart size, next to useless A/C, basic 2 airbags, no power steering, no sound deadening, 2 buckets without any real padding weights 2000 lbs. And the universal acclaimed Cayman at 2950 lbs. Then, a 2700-2800 lbs ft86 with a 25k price tag looks like a great engineering feat.
For people who complain or nit pick about the weight issue, go try a Elise and see how much you will hate it, unless driving a go kart daily is your thing. Kostamojen is right, asking toyota to build the ft86 in the 2500 lbs range is unrealistic given the car needs to be both practical and affordable. |
11-17-2011, 06:59 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Drives: NA8C, GDB, and R50
Location: Qatar
Posts: 310
Thanks: 17
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
See My Album: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/album.php?u=949
|
|
11-17-2011, 07:15 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: N/A
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 646 Times in 419 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I agree with Kostamojen's assessment. The different curbweights systems alone will make the US version appear 50lbs heavier.
Automatics typically add 50lbs over their manual versions. So 2800lbs isn't unrealistic once you add full tank of fuel and options. |
11-17-2011, 07:16 PM | #12 | |
2 wheel member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: JZA80, 997.1, Taco
Location: SoCal->NorCal
Posts: 4,330
Thanks: 1,318
Thanked 938 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...ght=insideline The weight will more than likely vary from country with the US having the heaviest due to the mandatory safety and emissions equipment. Then for CA, the engine may be even more restricted. On new vehicles, you're not due for a smog test for 5 yrs so that gives you plenty of time to mod it. As mentioned, the weight can be reduced and the engine can be opened up so starting with roughly 190hp/2800 lbs, it's a nice canvas to work with.
__________________
|
|
11-17-2011, 07:21 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Drives: NA8C, GDB, and R50
Location: Qatar
Posts: 310
Thanks: 17
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
See My Album: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/album.php?u=949
|
|
11-17-2011, 08:02 PM | #14 | |
2 wheel member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: JZA80, 997.1, Taco
Location: SoCal->NorCal
Posts: 4,330
Thanks: 1,318
Thanked 938 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
There is a lot you can do to shave the weight down but essentially dd and weight reduction rarely go hand in hand. It all depends on what you want to do.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Subaru engines' weights | Allch Chcar | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 19 | 04-30-2011 12:10 AM |
How much does the subbie boxer weigh? (4 cyl) | Myka | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 32 | 04-05-2010 01:22 AM |