|
Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-16-2012, 06:41 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 1986 AE86 GT-S, 2011 Lexus IS250 6M
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 661
Thanks: 136
Thanked 361 Times in 161 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Basically what it boils down to is that modern automatic transmissions do not have the huge losses that they had in the past, and the computer can select which gear to use for optimal fuel economy much more accurately than a person can without information like catalyst efficiency, A/F ratio, etc.
Yes gear ratios can play a part, but it's not the major contributor in this case. Jeff
__________________
2011 Lexus IS350 F-Sport 6MT with LSD 1986 Toyota Corolla GT-S Supercharged |
03-16-2012, 06:57 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: 2014 Boxster S; 2015 Macan S
Location: MA
Posts: 206
Thanks: 326
Thanked 233 Times in 63 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Question: I don't have the technical understanding, but I wonder if you can predict which transmission will provide the best 0-60 and 1/4 mile times for average driving enthusiasts, taking into account human vs. computer reaction times?
|
03-16-2012, 07:00 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: honda civic si 08
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 176
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Consistency? the automatic. But for the absolute best numbers, the manual should pull out the best 1/4 mile times.
|
03-16-2012, 07:08 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: 2014 Boxster S; 2015 Macan S
Location: MA
Posts: 206
Thanks: 326
Thanked 233 Times in 63 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Interesting answer. Never asked the question before because I'm not really that into those numbers. Would the answer be the same if one was auto crossing in the sport mode vs. manual?
|
03-16-2012, 07:09 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
A knowledgeable driver can shift better than a computer trying to interpret the movement of the gas pedal anyday...where are people getting the idea that a computer knows when to shift better when all it's doing is trying to read your mind?
|
03-16-2012, 07:32 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: 2014 Boxster S; 2015 Macan S
Location: MA
Posts: 206
Thanks: 326
Thanked 233 Times in 63 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I guess it's because we hear the computer can shift in .1 seconds, lockup in 2nd thru 6th, and uses logic that is actually pretty good at predicting driving intentions while in sport mode. That kind of technology, if done right, at least raises the question.
|
03-16-2012, 07:37 PM | #21 | |
Kuruma Otaku
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Knowledge is always good, but it's understandable that it would probably be a lot of wasted time on your part.
__________________
Because titanium. |
|
03-16-2012, 07:44 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
An automatic transmission in auto mode has the inherent limitation of needing to translate the gas pedal input into commands for both the engine and the gearbox. It also has the inherent limitation of having a hydraulic system which consumes a small amount of power, and a bit more weight to lug around. |
|
03-16-2012, 09:25 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: 2014 Boxster S; 2015 Macan S
Location: MA
Posts: 206
Thanks: 326
Thanked 233 Times in 63 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I do get better mileage out of my car than the EPA says I should without sacrificing acceleration or high speed highway cruising, and have never understood why. It was even more baffling when the EPA revamped their MPG estimates of my car downward ( I think the Celica went from 23/31 to 22/30 or something like that) and I'm getting 28 to 31 MPG in very mixed and occasionally sporty driving. Now I'm considering getting the BRZ with an Auto, and using the paddle shifter. If the mileage is better than the manual driving it that way, then I want the auto, I think. |
|
03-16-2012, 09:34 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: car
Location: cold
Posts: 599
Thanks: 72
Thanked 607 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
One thing you have to think about is that a modern automatic transmission can skip gears. They can go from 1st to 4th for example, and with torque converter lockup you don't have a series of tip-out and tip-in as you change gears. Thus there is less transient operation, and the engine can be more efficient that way. Of course a manual can skip gears too, but most people don't drive that way.
I don't know about the transmission calibration on the BRZ so it's hard to say what the shift schedule is though. It could have been tweaked to show favorable results on the EPA test cycles. I would be surprised if you could actually get better mileage on an auto with it in paddle shifting mode. I can pretty much guarantee you that the auto was not certified with the EPA separately using the paddle shifters. That costs millions of dollars. Usually the manufacturer will try to convince the regulator that most drivers never use the paddle shifters on normal commuting, and thus they get an exemption from having to certify it. The other thing we don't know for sure is what shift schedule they were using when certifying the manual transmission vehicle. It depends on the situation and what you are comparing I suppose. To oversimplify: someone who is really good with a bow and arrow could be more deadly than someone who is ok with a gun, but that doesn't mean the gun isn't overall a better weapon in most situations. Last edited by arghx7; 03-16-2012 at 09:58 PM. |
03-16-2012, 10:38 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Perhaps, I don't know how transmissions are programmed or anything but what I've seemed to notice is if you try to give it more than a tiny bit of throttle on most autos it kicks down a gear or 2. I guess you have a point about the faster shifts.
I have a suspicion that the gas pedal on modern autos does not control the load of the engine directly, but rather the computer interprets it as a demand for a certain level of power and then picks a gear and gives the engine appropriate load to match...is this correct? It would seem that such a strategy would help EPA city mileage a bit. |
03-16-2012, 11:22 PM | #26 |
Enjoy it, destroy it.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Datsun Racing Hen
Location: Blank Generation
Posts: 820
Thanks: 6
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Modern sports car automatics typically offer both faster acceleration and better gas mileage than can be achieved by the average driver in traditional manual. They also offer approximately equal drivetrain losses.
Why? Full lock up (generally, 2nd gear on) means a solid rather than viscous connection with engine, improved valve body calibration with electronic control means lightning fast shifts that will, on the average, far exceed what a human can do (and on supercars easily exceed without exception what a human could do), and the ability to select and hold any gear that you want, just as you would on a traditional manual, but with less opportunity for error (i.e., selecting the wrong gear). You lose some specific qualitative experiences (in exchange for another set, BTW) and gain better performance and gas mileage. If Toyota/Subaru fails to do this with the FR-S/BRZ it will not be for lack of technology but for lack of trying. Reviews of the auto in action and the fact that the trans will be highly similar to the one in the 370Z and IS-F in design and performance means a lot of guys driving the MT will probably be grinding their teeth when the car is released, but we'll have to wait and see... Anyway, ignore the brow beating, test drive both the AT and MT if you are unsure, and get the one that suits you. Last edited by Jordo!; 03-16-2012 at 11:57 PM. |
03-16-2012, 11:56 PM | #27 | |
Enjoy it, destroy it.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Datsun Racing Hen
Location: Blank Generation
Posts: 820
Thanks: 6
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
03-16-2012, 11:59 PM | #28 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: car
Location: cold
Posts: 599
Thanks: 72
Thanked 607 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Load is a bit of a nebulous term. There are different ways to calculate it in an onboard controller but they are all based on physics. They are usually related to pumping efficiency (and thus can exceed 100%) or they are normalized to the engine's max output (and thus peak at 100%). You can also use a physical quantity: on a Subaru or a GM it is based on the amount of air entering the cylinder. Other systems will base a load calculation on how much fuel would be required to achieve a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio under a given condition. Quote:
There are different types of architecture used, but this is exactly right. And it's been that way for 10+ years now. Toyota calls their current architecture the Integrated Drive Power Control System, and it's been around for about 5 years. It is in essence based on achieving target wheel torque and power. So the old way of electronically controlling a transmission (late 80s through 90s) was that you fed some signals to the transmission control unit and it reacted to rpm, TPS, and temperature inputs for the most part. Then electronic throttle was introduced in the late 90s, and you get an architecture like this: You've got an accelerator pedal position sensor signal feeding into two control paths, and then compensation algorithms for shifting, traction/stability control, vibration concerns, etc. Well that gets really complicated, especially as you add more control modules. Integrated control provides a more elegant solution: You utilize models and have the integrated controller coordinate the transmission and engine to achieve the target wheel torque/power. That also feeds into the engine dynamics control (stabilty control etc). The integrated engine controls help reduce vibration and fix the torque drop off between shifts if that's what the calibration calls for. You have to have a model to transfer target drive power into a torque request, and then a model to execute the torque request through actuator commands. This system was implemented on the AA80E transmission used in the Lexus LS and IS-F and I imagine it has trickled down to just about everything Toyota makes for this market by now. Last edited by arghx7; 03-17-2012 at 12:11 AM. |
||
|
|
Tags |
auto, consumption, manual, mpg, transmition |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FR-S to BRZ Ratio | MannyO | New England | 11 | 03-08-2012 02:23 AM |
Brz Production Numbers | WRB Bandit | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics | 29 | 03-07-2012 09:53 PM |
Any Idea of U.S. Pre-Order Numbers? | markemark24 | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 1 | 02-21-2012 12:29 PM |
Reverse gear on the first and second gear side | randytindoggy | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 52 | 01-29-2012 01:21 PM |
86,BRZ MT gear ratio | Yobiwan | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 1 | 01-26-2012 02:40 AM |