follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-21-2018, 08:30 PM   #29
BRZnut
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: BRZ DGM Limited
Location: USA
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 5
Thanked 431 Times in 250 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I don't know but my gut feeling is there will never be a second generation brz/86. Time will tell.
BRZnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2018, 09:27 PM   #30
df.dima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: FR-S and Mazda 3 Sky
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 341
Thanks: 10
Thanked 132 Times in 93 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
to boost sales they will CUV it
https://autowise.com/subaru-cross-sp...oad-going-brz/

100k a year volume, all the soccer moms can haz sports!
df.dima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2018, 12:04 AM   #31
Yoshoobaroo
TRACKBREAD
 
Yoshoobaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,024 Times in 1,895 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by df.dima View Post
to boost sales they will CUV it
https://autowise.com/subaru-cross-sp...oad-going-brz/

100k a year volume, all the soccer moms can haz sports!


Yoshoobaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2018, 03:10 AM   #32
evoto86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Drives: manual Toyota 86
Location: NSW
Posts: 117
Thanks: 23
Thanked 60 Times in 32 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The way the japanese are going more and more people will move to Korean cars if they keep releasing things like the stinger and i30n. The japanese are not exciting anybody.
evoto86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2018, 03:33 AM   #33
HKz
Reformed
 
HKz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: '23 GRC, '11 Prius, '04 RAV4
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,313
Thanks: 1,234
Thanked 1,133 Times in 588 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by evoto86 View Post
The way the japanese are going more and more people will move to Korean cars if they keep releasing things like the stinger and i30n. The japanese are not exciting anybody.

think you're not really giving them credit but I hope ya know those 2 models compete in rather small slices of the pie...sadly in many cases too small of a slice for a company like Toyota to care about competing in. Don't think either of those will displace a Accord or Camry anytime soon ...gotta keep in mind, most consumers don't care about driving something exciting...if that was the case, F150, RAV4 & CRV wouldn't be leading the sales charts by a big margin.
HKz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2018, 01:43 PM   #34
scuzzy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Drives: 22 BRZ limited MT
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 113
Thanks: 96
Thanked 115 Times in 45 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
With Subaru slashing profits due to recall anyone still expecting a next gen BRZ/86 ?
scuzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to scuzzy For This Useful Post:
HachiRokuX (11-05-2018)
Old 11-05-2018, 02:04 PM   #35
Adam_L
Senior Member
 
Adam_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: '16 FR-S RS2 MT, '06 xA Polar MT
Location: Central Coast California
Posts: 666
Thanks: 1,131
Thanked 159 Times in 118 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by HKz View Post
Don't think either of those will displace a Accord or Camry anytime soon ...gotta keep in mind, most consumers don't care about driving something exciting...if that was the case, F150, RAV4 & CRV wouldn't be leading the sales charts by a big margin.
Sales have shown the last 2-3 years, that American buyers aren't wanting sedans. They are buying trucks , SUV's , and cross-overs. This is all fact. Sedan sales have slowed

Americans must be living phat on the land (in general, no pun), sucking that gas... given those vehicles (sub 25 mpg)
__________________
Math is like Love, simple idea at first that quickly gets complicated
Adam_L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2018, 02:44 PM   #36
TylerLieberman
Senior Member
 
TylerLieberman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: '24 GR86
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,675
Thanks: 655
Thanked 3,342 Times in 1,576 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HKz View Post
think you're not really giving them credit but I hope ya know those 2 models compete in rather small slices of the pie...sadly in many cases too small of a slice for a company like Toyota to care about competing in. Don't think either of those will displace a Accord or Camry anytime soon ...gotta keep in mind, most consumers don't care about driving something exciting...if that was the case, F150, RAV4 & CRV wouldn't be leading the sales charts by a big margin.
I mean, if you think about it, it's kind of true. In the 90s and early 00s, Japanese performance vehicles were hitting well above their weight.

You had sports coupes that were posting respectable numbers against V8 muscle cars and you had sport sedans that were capable of hanging with german sports cars and exotic, high end vehicles. Now, not quite so much. The STI can't even hang with today's current Mustang or Camaro around a road course. CTR can't either, though it's a bit closer matchup.

Japan still produces quality vehicles, I think. Their simplistic commuter vehicles and such still do exactly what they were intended to do, but the selection is mostly vanilla. Look at Nissan. They pretty much throw some red pinstripes on every car and call it a Nismo. Similar to what BMW and MB are doing with M and AMG badges.

I know they do it because they sell, but it's pretty bland. Mitsubishi has nothing exciting. Toyota is pretty bland (86 aside). And the list goes on.

Times are changing, but it would be great to see more offerings from different companies. I was actually really hopeful with the 86/BRZ coming out that more companies would follow and produce their own vehicle, but so far, nobody's done it. Mazda keeps talking about another RX7 and Honda about another S2000. But still, nothing concrete yet.
TylerLieberman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2018, 02:51 PM   #37
Adam_L
Senior Member
 
Adam_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: '16 FR-S RS2 MT, '06 xA Polar MT
Location: Central Coast California
Posts: 666
Thanks: 1,131
Thanked 159 Times in 118 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The main reason being, is all manufactures are focusing on increasing MPG (EPA regulations) , so that's where a good chunk of their R&D is going towards. Efficiency , that is the name of the game (our reality). Can you have higher (better) by 5-10% more efficiency , as well as sport / fun to drive out of a vehicle (gas only, or hybrid, or... or), sure , but it's going to take lots of gumption to pull that off.
__________________
Math is like Love, simple idea at first that quickly gets complicated
Adam_L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2018, 02:53 PM   #38
HachiRokuX
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: Florida
Posts: 232
Thanks: 1,712
Thanked 117 Times in 73 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I still believe in a 2021 BRZ/86 with 2.4L naturally aspirated motor. We’ll finally have something that bests the S2000 stock.

.......


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HachiRokuX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2018, 02:58 PM   #39
Adam_L
Senior Member
 
Adam_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: '16 FR-S RS2 MT, '06 xA Polar MT
Location: Central Coast California
Posts: 666
Thanks: 1,131
Thanked 159 Times in 118 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Is it going to be more fuel efficient ? 2L to a 2.4L ? I doubt it. If they do a 2L turbo (220 hp, close to the same torque), along with some kind of hybrid system ( some kind of eco mode around town, so instead of getting 22-24mpg around town out of a NA 2L, you're getting 30-35 mpg around town), solid 38-42mpg highway, that would be sweet. Keep weight at around 2800 lbs

Or.... or, even better do a small 6cyl boxer , like a 2.7L . On highway and city driving (eco mode) cut off the two middle cylinders ( so now it's a 1.8L) with some kind of further hybrid system around town. That thing should (possibly) get mid-30's mpg city , mid 40's hwy . Yet, you'd have the 2.7L on full bore going on on-ramps, going 0-70mph , should be a solid 260hp / 230 torque rig
__________________
Math is like Love, simple idea at first that quickly gets complicated

Last edited by Adam_L; 11-05-2018 at 03:13 PM. Reason: add info
Adam_L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2018, 03:01 PM   #40
Adam_L
Senior Member
 
Adam_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: '16 FR-S RS2 MT, '06 xA Polar MT
Location: Central Coast California
Posts: 666
Thanks: 1,131
Thanked 159 Times in 118 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
People can try and dodge the whole fuel efficiency thing, it's important , or it isn't important .... need it/want it / don't care, what ever. The reality is, that is our reality. Increase MPG , while somehow increasing torque ( keep weight similar, with in 2-4%).

It's easy to increase HP/torque thru displacement , more cylinders, FI (possibly MPG stays the same or goes down). Not so easy to increase MPG, yet keeping the fun to drive aspect intact.
__________________
Math is like Love, simple idea at first that quickly gets complicated
Adam_L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2018, 03:06 PM   #41
J1Avs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Drives: 2018 BRZ tS
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 396
Thanks: 239
Thanked 232 Times in 125 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam_L View Post
People can try and dodge the whole fuel efficiency thing, it's important , or it isn't important .... need it/want it / don't care, what ever. The reality is, that is our reality. Increase MPG , while somehow increasing torque ( keep weight similar, with in 2-4%).
Except when you are Ford and decide to beat the game by eliminating small cars, and build larger vehicles and trucks that have lower and easier to meet requirements
J1Avs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2018, 03:15 PM   #42
Adam_L
Senior Member
 
Adam_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: '16 FR-S RS2 MT, '06 xA Polar MT
Location: Central Coast California
Posts: 666
Thanks: 1,131
Thanked 159 Times in 118 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Ford appeals to the farmer , business man needing a Full sized truck to do certain work. Sure, families of 4+ people also buy them, and SUV's.

Ford is behind the 8-ball, and need a reality check
__________________
Math is like Love, simple idea at first that quickly gets complicated
Adam_L is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford will stop selling cars by 2022... Racecomp Engineering Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 87 03-03-2019 01:52 PM
Scheduled maintenance in San Diego trailofdead Southern California 7 05-24-2015 06:18 PM
Scheduled maitenence dealers in OC? KungFuWaffle Southern California 3 12-25-2014 08:32 PM
subaru scheduled maintenance mike the snake Mechanical Maintenance (Oil, Fluids, Break-In, Servicing) 4 11-28-2014 06:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.