05-21-2014, 04:57 AM | #253 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: AE86, 2x GT86, TE27
Location: Christchurch NZ
Posts: 1,478
Thanks: 826
Thanked 1,179 Times in 522 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50693 I started out exploring 16's, and then started realised 15's would fit. That 15" is a 4 stud off my ae86, but I've since found a 5x100 watanabe 15x6 + 35 fits, but needs a 25mm spacer. I'm looking to use a 15x8 +10. Which sits inside the bodyline just. Any further in and it fouls on the tie rod end ball joint. Bloody hard finding a 15x8 in 5x100. And I'm not keen on getting custom ones made unless I know they'll definitely fit. While my 86 was on the hoist today, and armed with some more difuser knowledge, I had a closer look at things. One thing my mate pointed out (who will be doing my fab work) is that my diff, subframe, and even the lower control arms are all higher than the floor; even while the suspension is fully unloaded on the hoist. So will mean a super smooth path and entry to the diffuser. This subframe and diff are all raised as high as they can go. This will all end up in the race car. The exhaust on this car is 3", the race car will have a 2.5" But Simon pointed out that he'll only need to notch the subframe about 5mm for the smaller exhaust to be higher than the floor and diffuser. But he's more of a fan of side exiting the exhaust. So this is looking quite promising. Last edited by diss7; 05-21-2014 at 05:24 AM. |
|
05-21-2014, 11:32 AM | #254 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: Used to Drive:Grand-Am GS #54 E36M3
Location: So. OH
Posts: 561
Thanks: 77
Thanked 237 Times in 163 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Thx for the info on the Watanabes - which tire will you be running? |
|
05-21-2014, 05:17 PM | #255 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: AE86, 2x GT86, TE27
Location: Christchurch NZ
Posts: 1,478
Thanks: 826
Thanked 1,179 Times in 522 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
If going 15, I'll use the same slick I use on the ae86 which is 200/580-15 kumho s700. I have a spare set of these also, ready to go. |
|
06-24-2014, 03:48 AM | #256 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: GT86 DGM
Location: Sandnes, Norway
Posts: 623
Thanks: 22
Thanked 197 Times in 110 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Old thread, but i'm interested in actual figures for how much lift I'm getting at certain speeds with a stock, or close to stock setups? I've read through this thread but could only find a CL value that doesn't give me actual numbers in Newtons for a certain speed. (I think, I'm a novice at aero).
|
06-24-2014, 04:26 PM | #257 | |
Frosty Carrot
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: The Atomic Carrot
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 513
Thanks: 272
Thanked 428 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
where L = lift force rho = density of the fluid (air) v = free-stream velocity (vehicle speed or localized speed over a wing, etc) S = frontal cross-section area In reality, you're looking at a dynamic density and localized velocities... but let's keep it simple. If you needed a ballpark number, here's a horribly inaccurate estimate: S = body + tires + side mirrors = ( (51" - 5") x 70") + (2 x 9" x 5") + (2 x 7" x 5") = 3390 sq in = 23.5 sq ft
__________________
If you think you're nerd enough, join in the discussions about Suspension and Aerodynamic modelling!
Wall of Fame - JDL Auto Design, Raceseng, Vishnu Tuning, Penske Shocks, Nameless, Perrin, RaceComp Engineering, Essex/AP Racing, Verus, RacerX Wall of Shame - aFe Takeda, Wilwood, FA20Club |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Shankenstein For This Useful Post: | kavanagh (06-24-2014) |
06-24-2014, 05:55 PM | #258 |
So elite I'm 1338
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: WRB Subaru BRZ
Location: California
Posts: 3,008
Thanks: 1,835
Thanked 1,934 Times in 982 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
42
|
The Following User Says Thank You to tahdizzle For This Useful Post: | kavanagh (06-24-2014) |
06-24-2014, 06:45 PM | #259 |
Frosty Carrot
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: The Atomic Carrot
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 513
Thanks: 272
Thanked 428 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
__________________
If you think you're nerd enough, join in the discussions about Suspension and Aerodynamic modelling!
Wall of Fame - JDL Auto Design, Raceseng, Vishnu Tuning, Penske Shocks, Nameless, Perrin, RaceComp Engineering, Essex/AP Racing, Verus, RacerX Wall of Shame - aFe Takeda, Wilwood, FA20Club |
06-24-2014, 08:16 PM | #260 |
Fat on Corn Syrup
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: 2014 Asphalt FRS AT (yes, auto!)
Location: Secret Volcano Base in Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 801
Thanks: 3,372
Thanked 2,748 Times in 1,094 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
I just realized I've already been following the aerodynamic thread mentioned in your signature that I was afraid of jumping into:
If you think you're nerd enough, join in the discussions about Suspension and Aerodynamic modeling! It must be time for me to dig into the suspension one. Wish me luck! |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kavanagh For This Useful Post: | civicdrivr (06-24-2014), Shankenstein (06-24-2014) |
06-25-2014, 02:48 AM | #261 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: GT86 DGM
Location: Sandnes, Norway
Posts: 623
Thanks: 22
Thanked 197 Times in 110 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Reason I ask is that there's finally some good tools to put cars into a good commercial racing simulator called Assetto Corsa. I am doing the '86 platform and need as accurate data as I can get my hands on. :-)
|
06-27-2014, 01:26 PM | #262 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2015 WRX
Location: NC
Posts: 987
Thanks: 186
Thanked 624 Times in 364 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
@plucas
Given that you've done loads of aero testing, in your opinion is there any benefit to these TRD parts or are the purely cosmetic? This fills the gap between the rear window and the trunk lid. How about the TRD style lip spoilers? |
06-27-2014, 01:31 PM | #263 |
i'm sorry, what?
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Canada
Location: I rock a beat harder than you can beat it with rocks
Posts: 4,399
Thanks: 357
Thanked 2,506 Times in 1,268 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
question in rear wing location
wings mounted far back away from the rear axle, and wings mounted as close if not over the rear axle the far back mounted wings, do they not act as a lever.. making the axle the pivot point, and therefore lift the front of the car? and hence it would theoretically be better to have the wing directly over the rear axle to reduce this (but obviously impractical due to the roof being there and all that clean air stuff
__________________
don't you think if I was wrong, I'd know it?
|
07-17-2014, 11:44 PM | #264 | |
Frosty Carrot
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: The Atomic Carrot
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 513
Thanks: 272
Thanked 428 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The required support from the ground is still 200 lbs. How that force is distributed (front-to-rear) will definitely be affected by leverage. Chassis deflection, suspension geometry, squishy bushings, and other things will prevent the car from acting like an infinitely rigid member (Call 1-900-Mix-a-Lot!). In the motorsports world, they use aero leverage as a tool for balancing the car. Typically the rules restrict wing placement... but when the rules are loose (like hillclimb), you'll see some really innovative aero designs.
__________________
If you think you're nerd enough, join in the discussions about Suspension and Aerodynamic modelling!
Wall of Fame - JDL Auto Design, Raceseng, Vishnu Tuning, Penske Shocks, Nameless, Perrin, RaceComp Engineering, Essex/AP Racing, Verus, RacerX Wall of Shame - aFe Takeda, Wilwood, FA20Club |
|
07-18-2014, 06:20 AM | #265 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2019 Mazda Miata RF
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,105
Thanks: 979
Thanked 1,317 Times in 736 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
When you can move the wing back, you can get it to help drive the diffuser, so you gain downforce not only from the wing itself, but the increased efficiency of the diffuser.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Gunman For This Useful Post: | plucas (07-18-2014) |
07-18-2014, 06:45 AM | #266 | |
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: Subaru
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 185
Thanks: 117
Thanked 227 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Lip spoilers work well. It will make more downforce than wingless/spoilerless trunk. It will make less downforce than a proper wing. It should also have less drag that both wingless truck and a proper wing. Sorry I missed this question until now. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Front aerodynamics... need help! | TuxedoCartman | Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) | 16 | 10-23-2012 09:27 PM |
Interesting aerodynamics differences between USDM, JDM, etc. | yargk | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 25 | 09-20-2012 04:00 PM |
Coefficient Drag & Aftermarket Aerodynamics | FT-86GOD | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 1 | 06-28-2012 01:20 AM |
Video: FR-S / BRZ Aerodynamics and D-4S Fuel Injection Explained | Moshpit37 | FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum | 19 | 06-26-2012 09:19 PM |
Video: FR-S / BRZ Aerodynamics and D-4S Fuel Injection Explained | Moshpit37 | BRZ Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum | 1 | 06-21-2012 12:47 PM |