04-29-2018, 10:24 AM | #155 | |
No-Club
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: Subaru Brz
Location: Florida
Posts: 60
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
04-29-2018, 10:42 AM | #156 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Drives: 2017 Series Yellow BRZ
Location: New York
Posts: 300
Thanks: 34
Thanked 269 Times in 127 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
1. I am fortunate in life and had the money for it 2. I never plan to FI this car. 3. I wanted a smoother power delivery, which on the track helps tremendously powering out of corner. I have a goal of taking the left hander at LimeRock in 4th gear. I think I can do that in 4500rpm range, but the previous torque dip and resulting power jump would kick out the rear. 4. Reliability, I am done at this point on power/engine mods other than finishing installing my oil cooler. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Azzudien For This Useful Post: | JSube (04-30-2018) |
04-29-2018, 11:39 AM | #157 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S Argento
Location: Westport,CT
Posts: 1,855
Thanks: 517
Thanked 1,039 Times in 616 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Caveat #1 - most FI headaches/catastrophes are install error, so make sure you know what you're doing, and know the quirks of your specific kit, they all have their own things to deal with Caveat #2 - supplemental cooling is a good idea, depending on your climate, how hard you drive, and how much power you're making Caveat #3 - with FI you're pushing the motor way past its design tolerances. Some motors have less defects than others, and likely all of them will be fine on stockish power, or even with NA bolt on mods. Double your power with FI, these defects will rise to the surface. Motor A will last for another 100k miles. Motor B will throw a rod in 2 weeks after going FI. Either roll the dice or budget for a motor rebuild in the future (header mods don't pose as much of a risk in this area). Caveat #4 - used kit, potentially missing parts, wear on the kit from heat and mileage, no coverage if expensive things fail (like Rotrex units, etc.) That's all I'm saying - you can go budget if you have to, but the risk of headaches is much higher, you may end up loathing the day you installed the kit, and eventually just hating your car if you cut corners. For my uses I agree with you on the expense though - ACE is generally regarded as the best design, but it's quite expensive. I bought a used piece for $400 that completely changes how my car drives for the better. |
|
04-29-2018, 12:49 PM | #158 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
A positive displacement supercharger will add power, but it 'll also increase the weight close to the range of 2990lbs. It depends if you want to have a fatty FI car or a lightweight NA car with similar power to weight ratio. Having said that, it is not as simple as swapping an exhaust manifold. The latter is only a small part of the equation. Personally, I would go always with the NA option since there are other advantages as less strain on certain parts and better handling characteristics.
|
04-29-2018, 01:58 PM | #159 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2013 frs red
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,517
Thanks: 2,520
Thanked 3,088 Times in 1,654 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I think it would be more expensive to match power to weight ratio of sc car by lightening a na car.
|
04-29-2018, 02:35 PM | #160 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
04-29-2018, 04:00 PM | #161 | |
pessimistic skeptic
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: '14 FR-S Monogram AT JRSC
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,767
Thanks: 1,695
Thanked 1,035 Times in 684 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
2800 lbs is the stock weight 2800/260 = 10.77 lbs/whp for a supercharger with 91 octane 200 whp is the highest NA with 91 octane around. It was CSGMike's car with ACE ~ 195whp. But lets call it 200 for your benefit. 200 whp * 10.77 lbs/whp = 2153 lbs required for the same ratio of a supercharged twin. Show me a twin at this curb weight suitable for daily driving. There is only one on this forum which is close to 2200 lbs. And it is completely stripped out with just one seat in it and it doesn't count. It is not possible to bring an NA car to the same power-to-weght ratio of a supercharged car. Yet again, you don't know what you are talking about. Last edited by mrg666; 04-29-2018 at 04:26 PM. Reason: added link |
|
04-29-2018, 05:20 PM | #162 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: C5 Corvette, '17 Toyota 86, Jeep XJ
Location: New Castle DE
Posts: 1,500
Thanks: 1,436
Thanked 914 Times in 528 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
For Justin I realize you are setup for autocross but did you happen to do any 0-60 type comparisons? It would be interesting to see how much that boost in the middle of the power band would help real world times
__________________
|
04-29-2018, 07:45 PM | #163 | |
Weight Weenie
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 15 FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,584
Thanks: 5,015
Thanked 2,330 Times in 1,346 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to new2subaru For This Useful Post: | CSG Mike (04-30-2018) |
04-29-2018, 08:52 PM | #164 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Driver.
|
04-29-2018, 09:08 PM | #165 |
Weight Weenie
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 15 FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,584
Thanks: 5,015
Thanked 2,330 Times in 1,346 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
04-30-2018, 12:03 AM | #166 |
btr.life
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 2022 GR86
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 662
Thanked 1,094 Times in 491 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Unfortunately I did not. Looking back, I wish I would have.
__________________
|
04-30-2018, 01:50 AM | #167 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
04-30-2018, 02:22 AM | #168 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: Crapcan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11,163
Thanks: 18,156
Thanked 16,323 Times in 7,381 Posts
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Stock wheels are about 20.7lbs My Rays 57DR's 17X9 +38 come in at 20.2 Not sure on tires but I doubt my 245 RS3's are more then a pound heavier then stock. Quote:
|
||
The Following User Says Thank You to NoHaveMSG For This Useful Post: | new2subaru (04-30-2018) |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My Nameless header dyno results (results to follow) | Simply_the_best | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 39 | 06-28-2016 04:09 PM |
Australian Dyno Dyno Results | Shiv@Openflash | Software Tuning | 11 | 07-22-2015 04:57 AM |
86 Dyno results | Anban | AFRICA | 18 | 01-14-2014 06:54 AM |
Dyno Compilation - dyno testing results and recommendations | Illusive | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 82 | 02-08-2013 07:00 PM |