follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-29-2018, 10:24 AM   #155
Funk
No-Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: Subaru Brz
Location: Florida
Posts: 60
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by bfrank1972 View Post
I think this header is for people who A) aren't interested in FI for various reasons, or B) are interested in supercharging down the road and want to optimize at no expense spared. Also keep in mind that purchasing/shipping/installing/tuning/running someone's used supercharger kit costs significantly more than $1700 plus an extra 500-600.
Well that is correct it would be more but if you are the person installing the kit most of the things you have to worry about is tuning which a tune runs about 400 bucks i mean you make a point understandable
Funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 10:42 AM   #156
Azzudien
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Drives: 2017 Series Yellow BRZ
Location: New York
Posts: 300
Thanks: 34
Thanked 269 Times in 127 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Funk View Post
That’s to much in my opinion for a header lol for that 1700 I’d rather save an extra 500 to 600 more and get someone’s used supercharger kit honestly and get way more power then a header that costs that much .
You miss the point of this setup as it really is not about power. The reason I purchased is:
1. I am fortunate in life and had the money for it
2. I never plan to FI this car.
3. I wanted a smoother power delivery, which on the track helps tremendously powering out of corner. I have a goal of taking the left hander at LimeRock in 4th gear. I think I can do that in 4500rpm range, but the previous torque dip and resulting power jump would kick out the rear.
4. Reliability, I am done at this point on power/engine mods other than finishing installing my oil cooler.
Azzudien is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Azzudien For This Useful Post:
JSube (04-30-2018)
Old 04-29-2018, 11:39 AM   #157
bfrank1972
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S Argento
Location: Westport,CT
Posts: 1,855
Thanks: 517
Thanked 1,039 Times in 616 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Funk View Post
Well that is correct it would be more but if you are the person installing the kit most of the things you have to worry about is tuning which a tune runs about 400 bucks i mean you make a point understandable
Yup I get it, bang for the buck, but a few things:

Caveat #1 - most FI headaches/catastrophes are install error, so make sure you know what you're doing, and know the quirks of your specific kit, they all have their own things to deal with

Caveat #2 - supplemental cooling is a good idea, depending on your climate, how hard you drive, and how much power you're making

Caveat #3 - with FI you're pushing the motor way past its design tolerances. Some motors have less defects than others, and likely all of them will be fine on stockish power, or even with NA bolt on mods. Double your power with FI, these defects will rise to the surface. Motor A will last for another 100k miles. Motor B will throw a rod in 2 weeks after going FI. Either roll the dice or budget for a motor rebuild in the future (header mods don't pose as much of a risk in this area).

Caveat #4 - used kit, potentially missing parts, wear on the kit from heat and mileage, no coverage if expensive things fail (like Rotrex units, etc.)

That's all I'm saying - you can go budget if you have to, but the risk of headaches is much higher, you may end up loathing the day you installed the kit, and eventually just hating your car if you cut corners.

For my uses I agree with you on the expense though - ACE is generally regarded as the best design, but it's quite expensive. I bought a used piece for $400 that completely changes how my car drives for the better.
bfrank1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 12:49 PM   #158
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
A positive displacement supercharger will add power, but it 'll also increase the weight close to the range of 2990lbs. It depends if you want to have a fatty FI car or a lightweight NA car with similar power to weight ratio. Having said that, it is not as simple as swapping an exhaust manifold. The latter is only a small part of the equation. Personally, I would go always with the NA option since there are other advantages as less strain on certain parts and better handling characteristics.
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 01:58 PM   #159
Lantanafrs2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2013 frs red
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,517
Thanks: 2,520
Thanked 3,088 Times in 1,654 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
I think it would be more expensive to match power to weight ratio of sc car by lightening a na car.
Lantanafrs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 02:35 PM   #160
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2 View Post
I think it would be more expensive to match power to weight ratio of sc car by lightening a na car.
Yes it is more expensive and not always optimal for a daily driver.
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 04:00 PM   #161
mrg666
pessimistic skeptic
 
mrg666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: '14 FR-S Monogram AT JRSC
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,767
Thanks: 1,695
Thanked 1,035 Times in 684 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
A positive displacement supercharger will add power, but it 'll also increase the weight close to the range of 2990lbs. It depends if you want to have a fatty FI car or a lightweight NA car with similar power to weight ratio. Having said that, it is not as simple as swapping an exhaust manifold. The latter is only a small part of the equation. Personally, I would go always with the NA option since there are other advantages as less strain on certain parts and better handling characteristics.
260 whp is the entry level power of a supercharged twin with 91 octane.

2800 lbs is the stock weight

2800/260 = 10.77 lbs/whp for a supercharger with 91 octane

200 whp is the highest NA with 91 octane around. It was CSGMike's car with ACE ~ 195whp. But lets call it 200 for your benefit.

200 whp * 10.77 lbs/whp = 2153 lbs required for the same ratio of a supercharged twin.

Show me a twin at this curb weight suitable for daily driving. There is only one on this forum which is close to 2200 lbs. And it is completely stripped out with just one seat in it and it doesn't count.

It is not possible to bring an NA car to the same power-to-weght ratio of a supercharged car. Yet again, you don't know what you are talking about.

Last edited by mrg666; 04-29-2018 at 04:26 PM. Reason: added link
mrg666 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mrg666 For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (04-30-2018), tomm.brz (04-30-2018)
Old 04-29-2018, 05:20 PM   #162
SuperTom
Senior Member
 
SuperTom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: C5 Corvette, '17 Toyota 86, Jeep XJ
Location: New Castle DE
Posts: 1,500
Thanks: 1,436
Thanked 914 Times in 528 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
For Justin I realize you are setup for autocross but did you happen to do any 0-60 type comparisons? It would be interesting to see how much that boost in the middle of the power band would help real world times
__________________
SuperTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 07:45 PM   #163
new2subaru
Weight Weenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 15 FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,584
Thanks: 5,015
Thanked 2,330 Times in 1,346 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
A positive displacement supercharger will add power, but it 'll also increase the weight close to the range of 2990lbs. It depends if you want to have a fatty FI car or a lightweight NA car with similar power to weight ratio. Having said that, it is not as simple as swapping an exhaust manifold. The latter is only a small part of the equation. Personally, I would go always with the NA option since there are other advantages as less strain on certain parts and better handling characteristics.
An AT FR-S is 2,800lbs. MT less. Where is the extra 190lbs coming from?
new2subaru is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to new2subaru For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (04-30-2018)
Old 04-29-2018, 08:52 PM   #164
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Driver.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 09:08 PM   #165
new2subaru
Weight Weenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 15 FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,584
Thanks: 5,015
Thanked 2,330 Times in 1,346 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by churchx View Post
Driver.
I don't think so. It doesn't read that way to me, church.

A positive displacement supercharger will add power, but it 'll also increase the weight close to the range of 2990lbs
new2subaru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2018, 12:03 AM   #166
justinco
btr.life
 
justinco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 2022 GR86
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 662
Thanked 1,094 Times in 491 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperTom View Post
For Justin I realize you are setup for autocross but did you happen to do any 0-60 type comparisons? It would be interesting to see how much that boost in the middle of the power band would help real world times
Unfortunately I did not. Looking back, I wish I would have.
__________________
justinco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2018, 01:50 AM   #167
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by new2subaru View Post
An AT FR-S is 2,800lbs. MT less. Where is the extra 190lbs coming from?
Quote:
Originally Posted by new2subaru View Post
I don't think so. It doesn't read that way to me, church.

A positive displacement supercharger will add power, but it 'll also increase the weight close to the range of 2990lbs
A supercharger weights let's say 65lbs, but you also need supported modifications. Bigger wheels and tires, bigger brakes. Maybe the 2990lbs weight was too much, but you can easily reach the 2900+ lbs area.
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2018, 02:22 AM   #168
NoHaveMSG
Senior Member
 
NoHaveMSG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: Crapcan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11,163
Thanks: 18,156
Thanked 16,323 Times in 7,381 Posts
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
A supercharger weights let's say 65lbs, but you also need supported modifications. Bigger wheels and tires, bigger brakes. Maybe the 2990lbs weight was too much, but you can easily reach the 2900+ lbs area.


Stock wheels are about 20.7lbs
My Rays 57DR's 17X9 +38 come in at 20.2

Not sure on tires but I doubt my 245 RS3's are more then a pound heavier then stock.

Quote:
Front Brakes
31.2lbs - OEM (Source)
21.0lbs - AP Sprint kit (Source)
I am on the ST kit which is about 3 lbs heavier per side then the AP kit.
NoHaveMSG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NoHaveMSG For This Useful Post:
new2subaru (04-30-2018)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My Nameless header dyno results (results to follow) Simply_the_best Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 39 06-28-2016 04:09 PM
Australian Dyno Dyno Results Shiv@Openflash Software Tuning 11 07-22-2015 04:57 AM
86 Dyno results Anban AFRICA 18 01-14-2014 06:54 AM
Dyno Compilation - dyno testing results and recommendations Illusive Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 82 02-08-2013 07:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.