follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions

Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-14-2013, 05:25 AM   #197
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
I really dislike the exterior, but they deserve compliments on the drivetrain and chassis. The bars in the gigantic front grille are flat out ugly (anyone else think they look like braces on teeth?), and the rear is extremely ugly as well.

Opening those vents for transmission cooling is a very clever adaptation to the upward slanting body at the rear (good to see they're not trying to use it for brake cooling like the Viper, because using 2 90 degree turns with a submerged inlet like they do on the Viper means you don't get airflow for crap), but ideally for aero they should be using soft edges, not those sharp ones.

Still, DI, VCM, intake cam phasing, 2 stage oil pump, 7 speed manual gearbox is pretty much as good as it gets. They'll need to eventually add start-stop in a refresh if they want that 17mpg city figure to go up, a 6.2L engine just burns through too much fuel while idle. If it were up to me to decide the engine's targets, I'd care less about the torque and drop the displacement a little and put the power up higher in the rev range, to make only 450hp from a direct injected 6.2L engine is a little pathetic. This is a light sports car, not a truck.
I guess me and you differ on this part but when a 3100 lb car is making 450hp/450tq even from a 8L it is not pathetic. This car is all about the P2W ratio and that matters much to enthusiast who craves performance. I could understand your point if it only made 270hp with 6.2L, What I find funny is when some cars come with this 100hp/L thing and still feel slow as shit. It's as if that's supposed to make a difference that's impressive.
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 05:28 AM   #198
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 View Post
I guess me and you differ on this part but when a 3100 lb car is making 450hp/450tq even from a 8L it is not pathetic. This car is all about the P2W ratio and that matters much to enthusiast who craves performance. I could understand your point if it only made 270hp with 6.2L, What I find funny is when some cars come with this 100hp/L thing and still feel slow as shit. It's as if that's supposed to make a difference that's impressive.
450hp is pretty good, but the point was that they gave it truck cams which defeats the purpose. Go big or go home. If the target is 450hp, use a 5.5-5.7L engine, not a 6.2, and save some cost, mass, fuel, and engine compartment space. Save the bigger engine for the Z06 model or whatever, or make the base model Corvette more powerful.

I'm not talking about overhead cams vs. pushrod.

All else equal, to use a bigger engine to make the same power makes very little sense when you have enough torque to spin the tires off the line.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 06:09 AM   #199
ZetaVI
Gundam Meister
 
ZetaVI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: A Gundam
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 2,685
Thanks: 320
Thanked 1,010 Times in 510 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Interior is underwhelming and the back is bit too much. Overall, I still think it looks really good.
ZetaVI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 09:22 AM   #200
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,794
Thanks: 2,164
Thanked 4,242 Times in 2,220 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Looks pretty good. As others have mentioned, I don't like the rear or the interior much, but hard to tell from pics. I would love to see one in person.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 09:39 AM   #201
LSxJunkie
Douchebag
 
LSxJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2014 Mustang GT
Location: NY
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 283
Thanked 403 Times in 214 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
450hp is pretty good, but the point was that they gave it truck cams which defeats the purpose. Go big or go home. If the target is 450hp, use a 5.5-5.7L engine, not a 6.2, and save some cost, mass, fuel, and engine compartment space. Save the bigger engine for the Z06 model or whatever, or make the base model Corvette more powerful.

I'm not talking about overhead cams vs. pushrod.

All else equal, to use a bigger engine to make the same power makes very little sense when you have enough torque to spin the tires off the line.
All else being equal.....except valvetrain?

It would have taken a lot more than 11.5:1 compression to make 450hp out of a 5.5-5.7 OHV motor and still hit the fuel mileage and drivability goals they were looking for. That's a midrange aftermarket cam. No smooth idle, no 26+mpg highway, certainly no 17mpg city.
__________________
Here - 2014 Mustang GT Track Package/Recaros - Koni Yellows, Boss 302 Springs, BMR SB041 Front Sway Bar, Boss 302 Rear Sway Bar, Boss 302 Wheels, GT500 Quad Tip Axleback, 2016 Legacy 2.5i Limited
Gone - 2010 RX350, 2006 GTO (2nd), 2007 RX350, 2008 IS250AWD, 2006 GTO, 2004 G35 6MT, 1992 SC400
LSxJunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 10:13 AM   #202
Rayme
The Answer
 
Rayme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: Mazda 2
Location: Moncton, NB
Posts: 1,233
Thanks: 488
Thanked 661 Times in 315 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I very much love the whole design, if there's one thing is I find the rear is too flat, I would have liked it to have a bit more relief. Feels like there's too much going on on a 2d surface.
__________________
Rayme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 10:33 AM   #203
CTB727
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 237
Thanks: 65
Thanked 104 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I hate the Camaro taillights. Everything else looks good. And it's about time they updated the interior so it doesn't look like it's from a Cobalt.
CTB727 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 10:37 AM   #204
Draco-REX
Corner Junkie
 
Draco-REX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 11 STI, 99 RS
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,908
Thanks: 129
Thanked 1,520 Times in 702 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
450hp is pretty good, but the point was that they gave it truck cams which defeats the purpose. Go big or go home. If the target is 450hp, use a 5.5-5.7L engine, not a 6.2, and save some cost, mass, fuel, and engine compartment space. Save the bigger engine for the Z06 model or whatever, or make the base model Corvette more powerful.

I'm not talking about overhead cams vs. pushrod.

All else equal, to use a bigger engine to make the same power makes very little sense when you have enough torque to spin the tires off the line.
I can spin the tires off the line in my BRZ with 150lb/f of torque, that argument is kinda meaningless...

As for cost, mass,and engine space, a 5.7 or a 6.2 will take up the same amount of space. The difference in displacement is a matter of cylinder bore and stroke. The block size will stay the same.

The Vette's strength is it's torque and ability to exit corners better than its competition. Going to a small displacement low-tq, high-hp engine just because that's what the europeans do won't do it any favors.
Draco-REX is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Draco-REX For This Useful Post:
LSxJunkie (01-14-2013)
Old 01-14-2013, 10:41 AM   #205
thorlius
Canadian
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Frieda: Firestorm/MT (11/28/2012)
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 408
Thanks: 55
Thanked 53 Times in 37 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by CTB727 View Post
I hate the Camaro taillights. Everything else looks good. And it's about time they updated the interior so it doesn't look like it's from a Cobalt.
This exactly. The sunglasses are cartoonish and lame for a sports car. Even the Camaro (I used to frequent the camaro5 forums) guys mostly hate the taillights like that.

The rest of the car looks great.

I drove a Cobalt as a winter car and a C6 as a summer car before selling the former and trading in the latter for the FR-S, and agree 100%. Identical steering wheels was a joke.

I'm pretty happy I made the deal as I would have been very jealous of the C7s on the road if I was driving around in a base C6.
thorlius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 11:11 AM   #206
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,377
Thanked 3,891 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
450hp is pretty good, but the point was that they gave it truck cams which defeats the purpose.
Max power at 6000rpm => not a truck cam.

Quote:
If the target is 450hp, use a 5.5-5.7L engine, not a 6.2, and save some cost, mass, fuel, and engine compartment space.
Weirdly enough, one reason they stuck with 6.2 is for fuel efficiency. It will be able to run more of the time as a 4-cylinder than if they'd made it a 5.5.

Quote:
All else equal, to use a bigger engine to make the same power makes very little sense when you have enough torque to spin the tires off the line.
Torque at the wheels includes torque multiplication from gearing. A 450hp 5.5 would definitely be lower-geared than the 450hp 6.2. Actual torque at the wheels would be similar.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 01:26 PM   #207
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
I hate the rear end, but I'll drive one and would consider buying a Z51 7MT car. In the end I'll probably have the same complaints I always have about modern Vettes.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 02:36 PM   #208
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draco-REX View Post
I can spin the tires off the line in my BRZ with 150lb/f of torque, that argument is kinda meaningless...

As for cost, mass,and engine space, a 5.7 or a 6.2 will take up the same amount of space. The difference in displacement is a matter of cylinder bore and stroke. The block size will stay the same.

The Vette's strength is it's torque and ability to exit corners better than its competition. Going to a small displacement low-tq, high-hp engine just because that's what the europeans do won't do it any favors.
If the engine was optimized as a smaller displacement, it would be smaller, lighter and rev better. Smaller bore with same wall thickness will be shorter longitudinally. Shorter stroke means the lower crankcase can be shorter/engine can be lower. And since the deck height is based on rod length which is also based on stroke, it too would be less, meaning shorter height and narrower width. Plus less rotating inertia from smaller/lighter internal and reduced stroke diameter.

Not saying it would be a massive amount, but it would be smaller and lighter.
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 02:38 PM   #209
LIKEABOSS
Senior Member
 
LIKEABOSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Boss 302 & 2013 FR-S
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 235
Thanks: 15
Thanked 44 Times in 37 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Laguna Blue with Black Wheels Please!
LIKEABOSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 02:46 PM   #210
LSxJunkie
Douchebag
 
LSxJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2014 Mustang GT
Location: NY
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 283
Thanked 403 Times in 214 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LIKEABOSS View Post
Laguna Blue with Black Wheels Please!

Agreed.





__________________
Here - 2014 Mustang GT Track Package/Recaros - Koni Yellows, Boss 302 Springs, BMR SB041 Front Sway Bar, Boss 302 Rear Sway Bar, Boss 302 Wheels, GT500 Quad Tip Axleback, 2016 Legacy 2.5i Limited
Gone - 2010 RX350, 2006 GTO (2nd), 2007 RX350, 2008 IS250AWD, 2006 GTO, 2004 G35 6MT, 1992 SC400
LSxJunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LSxJunkie For This Useful Post:
LIKEABOSS (01-14-2013)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2014 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28: The Trans-Am Racer Returns! JPxM0Dz Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 53 02-24-2016 10:55 AM
OEM Chevrolet Corvette 17x9.5 +56 BII302 Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 44 06-07-2014 01:52 AM
Marc08EX Detailed: 2007 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 - Black Marc08EX Cosmetic Maintenance (Wash, Wax, Detailing, Body Repairs) 8 07-11-2012 10:57 PM
2011 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Carbon slots in right below ZR1 vh_supra26 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 2 03-14-2010 09:09 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.