10-17-2017, 02:52 PM | #449 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '12 C63 P31, '23 GRC
Location: NC
Posts: 3,200
Thanks: 2,935
Thanked 2,072 Times in 1,185 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
It's a great time to be alive if you love powerful overweight fat RWD coupes like the Camaro and Mustang, but if you want affordable RWD lightweight and a fixed roof you've got one option - FT86. Sure the pony cars handle well now, but one weekend on the track with one of those will shred a $1500-2000 set of tires.
__________________
Current: 2023 GRC Circuit Edition, 2012 C63 AMG P31
Past: (2) 2000 MR2 Spyder, 2017 GTI Sport, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, Supercharged 2013 BRZ-L, 2007 Honda S2000, 1992 Integra GS-R |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to WolfpackS2k For This Useful Post: | funwheeldrive (10-17-2017), krayzie (10-17-2017) |
10-17-2017, 03:12 PM | #450 | ||
-
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,365
Thanks: 13,733
Thanked 9,479 Times in 4,998 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I didn't realize 4 doors = not good Should we take the Evo, WRX, GTI, and Focus RS off the list then? Quote:
In the 2000's there was precisely one option: RX-8 In the 2010's it's the 86 I'm not saying everything is perfect or it can't be better, I'm saying it's not worse now than it was back then, take off the rose colored glasses. Go back to the 80's and yes, a plethora of affordable lightweight RWD coupes from the FB/FC RX-7 to the mk2/3 Supra, AE86, the mk1 300zx, etc. but independent rear suspension is pretty nifty along with steel unibodies that aren't tin cans if you actually want to drive your car hard. Edit: have your golden age and nostalgia, I can't take that away from you. What bothers me is the whole "Oh woe is us things were BETTER back in the 90's" No They weren't. You can like the cars more, sure, I like some of them too, I'd love to own a well setup Civic/Integra or RX-7, those are near the top of my list and I would own them if I had time and money and space. But the idea that what's out now is garbage is stupid. Last edited by strat61caster; 10-17-2017 at 03:25 PM. |
||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to strat61caster For This Useful Post: |
10-17-2017, 04:47 PM | #451 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: BANNED FOR TELLING THE TRUTH
Location: MODS ARE ON A POWER TRIP
Posts: 3,447
Thanks: 7,830
Thanked 3,022 Times in 1,409 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
It really just comes down to what 'Better' means to the individual. Sure, newer cars have better laptimes and performance figures. To some people that is a priority. Other people prefer simple cars that are a little more basic and easy to work on. Nowadays even economy cars come loaded with blindspot detectors, backup cameras, touchscreen infotainment, etc. New cars will never be stupid simple like they were in the 90s, just like 90s cars will never be stupid simple like they were in the 60s. Long story short, I think a lot of us are stuck in the past like you already implied in your post. I think people hold an attraction to 90s cars still because they were mostly free of the electrical gremlins of the 80s, more reliable/economical than 60-70s cars (on average), but were still relatively raw compared to most cars made today. The exterior design of 90s cars was also top notch and manufactures didn't care about what happened to stupid pedestrians back then. |
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to funwheeldrive For This Useful Post: |
10-17-2017, 04:56 PM | #452 | |
Drive From Home
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: BRZ STI Performance
Location: Filth City
Posts: 4,914
Thanks: 2,368
Thanked 3,111 Times in 2,007 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Did you drive a fresh one when they were new back in the 90's? I sure did. One thing I'm impressed with modern technology tho is tires. |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to krayzie For This Useful Post: | funwheeldrive (10-17-2017), WolfpackS2k (10-18-2017) |
10-17-2017, 05:25 PM | #453 | ||
-
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,365
Thanks: 13,733
Thanked 9,479 Times in 4,998 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I grew up in the 90's, I didn't get to appreciate the full array of what's on offer. What cars do you think are worth mentioning in regards to seating position and steering feel? The cars I grew up in and experience in retrospect were unremarkable at best and as bad as the worst offenders today at the worst. The gems are few and far between in any era. Quote:
Remote door locks Power adjust sideview mirrors Telescoping steering wheel Cruise control Rear disc brakes https://www.toyota.com/configurator/...8/series/yaris It was a trip getting into a rental car and then having to roll down the windows to adjust the mirrors. From what I hear power windows were only recently made standard. My FR-S is pretty damn simple, not a single piece of tech aside from the stereo (Bluetooth and HD radio) that wasn't available in 1996. It's why I bought it, I love that simplicity so much so I put my money where my mouth is. There's a difference between "I don't like cars today, I like the 90's" and "cars today are shit, the 90's were better" I won't argue the former, but I will argue the latter. I would rather a 2017 GTI over a 1997 GTI or an FR-S over a 240SX. |
||
10-17-2017, 06:41 PM | #454 |
Drive From Home
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: BRZ STI Performance
Location: Filth City
Posts: 4,914
Thanks: 2,368
Thanked 3,111 Times in 2,007 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Does S13 count?
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMLERTjtI3Q"]MENCLUB AUTO€”€…ƒƒ‚€Œ›ž€€‘Nissan 200 SX(1990) & Nissan S13 Silvia(1991) - YouTube[/ame] How about EF Civic? [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcvltUAxAKA"]Honda EF8 X EF9 “…交Ÿ‚ - YouTube[/ame] But this is the one to die for stock. [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkeoDy3JcLs"]MENCLUB AUTO€”€—**œŽ‹96€‘Honda Integra Type R - YouTube[/ame] Trust me new for new I'll go for any one of these above than a BRZ, but of course that's impossible. The very reason the 86/BRZ exists in the first place is because we can no longer reproduce these gems in OG form. If that doesn't say something about how 80's/90's Japanese cars were seemingly better I don't know what does (notice no RX7/GTR/NSX/GTO/Fairlady Z/Supra here). Last edited by krayzie; 10-17-2017 at 06:54 PM. |
10-17-2017, 06:53 PM | #455 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post: |
10-17-2017, 07:22 PM | #456 | |
-
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,365
Thanks: 13,733
Thanked 9,479 Times in 4,998 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I hope the RX-? is more like the seating position and steering feel of the ND MX-5 than the Mazda3. Just like how great cars such as the 1997 NSX I drove a few months ago had high quality ergonomics like their other sporty cars and not like say the 1996 Accord I drove a few years back which was shitty and reminded me of the 1993 Corolla I owned since then. Edit: Ooh I forgot to mention the crappy seating positions and steering feel from the 2013 Corolla vs. my 2013 FR-S or the similarly crap 2016 Yaris. But the steering feel and seating position is so good in one car it's a total mystery as to how it can be bad in another car?!?!?!? Last edited by strat61caster; 10-17-2017 at 07:32 PM. |
|
10-17-2017, 07:36 PM | #457 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: BMW
Location: TX
Posts: 2,395
Thanks: 1,971
Thanked 1,825 Times in 952 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
10-17-2017, 08:48 PM | #458 |
Weight Weenie
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 15 FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,585
Thanks: 5,016
Thanked 2,330 Times in 1,346 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to new2subaru For This Useful Post: | funwheeldrive (10-17-2017), strat61caster (10-18-2017) |
10-17-2017, 08:55 PM | #459 | |
Drive From Home
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: BRZ STI Performance
Location: Filth City
Posts: 4,914
Thanks: 2,368
Thanked 3,111 Times in 2,007 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
And Toyota will always be Toyota. I appreciate their efforts with the twins but yes it's not quite there. Not sure how Mazda can bring this back in this form factor. [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtsQ4N9Ca8w"]MENCLUB AUTO-*œ‡’ˆ‘š„ƒˆ---Mazda RX-7(FD3S) - YouTube[/ame] [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvQVAlzfn1o"]雨宮RX-7介紹及試駕感受 - YouTube[/ame] Last edited by krayzie; 10-17-2017 at 09:06 PM. |
|
10-17-2017, 09:52 PM | #460 |
Nobody beats the B[I|R]Z
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: shopping cart i stole from walmart
Location: somewhere
Posts: 939
Thanks: 262
Thanked 1,145 Times in 456 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The overall point is that there was a large mainstream consumer preference for sporty, agile cars in the 1970s - 1990s. In the 1990s the SUV trend started, and today even regular sedans don't sell anymore, let alone sports cars.
20-30 years ago, even a something like a base civic would have a light, tossable, fun feel to it that today only a very few enthusiast cars have. But the market has changed. Now everyone thinks that any car that isn't rasied up like driving on stilts is unsafe or undesirable. Obviously it's not going to be as good for enthusiasts when that's the demand that auto makers have to meet. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to reni For This Useful Post: | funwheeldrive (10-17-2017), krayzie (10-17-2017) |
10-18-2017, 12:15 AM | #461 |
-
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,365
Thanks: 13,733
Thanked 9,479 Times in 4,998 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
I had fun chucking that rental yaris around.
|
10-18-2017, 12:52 PM | #462 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '12 C63 P31, '23 GRC
Location: NC
Posts: 3,200
Thanks: 2,935
Thanked 2,072 Times in 1,185 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I won't deny that we have tons of performance car options today, but thats different than a few decades ago. Most of the options are heavily based on boring econoboxes or sedans, because the automakers can't afford to give us the sexy dedicated platform coupes they used to (or at least that's what they tell us). The choices from the Germans, especially, are boggling Audi S & RS, BMW M, MB AMG...so much stuff. But oh, if you want something under 3500 lb with a manual transmission then you're SOL. In the end most of them are offering close to the exact same experience.
__________________
Current: 2023 GRC Circuit Edition, 2012 C63 AMG P31
Past: (2) 2000 MR2 Spyder, 2017 GTI Sport, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, Supercharged 2013 BRZ-L, 2007 Honda S2000, 1992 Integra GS-R |
The Following User Says Thank You to WolfpackS2k For This Useful Post: | krayzie (10-18-2017) |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Official: Nissan Concept 2020 Vision Gran Turismo revealed, hints future R36 GT-R | vh_supra26 | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 42 | 01-17-2016 02:28 AM |
Fs: Brand New BRZ OLM Vision LED Fog Lights | ucsmfu | Canada Classifieds | 12 | 03-12-2015 05:22 PM |
I have tunnel vision: 2004+ BMW 330ci ZHP | D4ng3r | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 3 | 08-24-2012 08:54 PM |
Mazda MX-5 Yusho concept introduced at AMI Leipzig | quik1987 | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 6 | 06-27-2012 04:36 PM |
2010 Mazda Shinari Concept | WingsofWar | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 18 | 09-07-2010 06:42 PM |