follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-25-2014, 04:48 AM   #1
Drift-Office
Senior Member
 
Drift-Office's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: AE86 / FRS / FC3S / GC8 / S14 / R32
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 789
Thanks: 633
Thanked 1,431 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Drift-Office : 5-Way SC Shootout! (ESC vs HKS vs Innovate vs Vortech vs JRSC vs KWSC)

Because you all asked for it!

Okay - so just like the UEL shootout previously, I've compiled a set of results which I feel are indicative of this current round of FI SC offerings. Again, given the conditions :6MT Vehicles
  • Similar Octane
  • Similar Tuning Philosophy
  • Similar Exhaust Components (Aftermarket CBEs at the very least!)
  • Tuning / Calibration - similar ignition / cam profiles
  • Dyno Facility @ 18FT AGL (Sea Level)
  • Cooler Temperatures @ 50 - 60

This is based on my own opinion, given what I've done in my own facility on the dyno while tuning in-house, live. For this thread though, I'm going to break it up into 2 groups :
  1. 0 ~ 8 PSI Setups
  2. 10 PSI Pulleys
So for the first group, we've got the following line up :


Based on the results, it's pretty evident that the HKS with the restrictor plate outshines them all, and so does it's price.

Name:  7 PSI SC.jpg
Views: 7361
Size:  213.5 KB

^^^ What's interesting here is that they all make about the same PEAK Torque (~180 PSI) regardless of their boost at WIDE OPEN THROTTLE (WOT). Clearly, the HKS with the header is breathing better than the non-intercooled Innovate / Sprintex SC setup. As discussed elsewhere in this forum, the Innovate SC lacks the ability to monitor post blower temps, or a way to log boost outside checking the logs, hence there's no boost plot on the dyno sheet. I will say that the numbers are in line with what we've seen here and elsewhere. The Phantom ESC @ WOT shows a fair bit of promise and might be the ticket for some, just not me unfortunately.

Onto the next comparo, we've got Vortech, JRSC and KWSC. These 3 would be the bread and butter of the GT86 SC market for the foreseeable future. They've got good fitment, great quality parts and a kit price that is comparable to each other right at the $4k mark.

Vortech : http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=45835
JRSC Kit : http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52992
KWSC Kit : http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53538

Name:  10 PSI SC.jpg
Views: 7066
Size:  184.2 KB

^^^ Not too much to say here, other than these 3 kits are all very well suited for a multitude of purposes, including SHOW since they all have very nice and attractive (read : BLING) features that stand out in the engine bay. For the money, it does look like it comes down to the JRSC and KWSC kit. After all, they are very similar in design, right down to their SD (Speed Density) calibrations that are required.

So really, if I had to pick one, my choice would be that of function over form, coupled with a price to performance ratio that's rated equally high. That choice would be *drum roll please...*

The KraftWerks SC offering.

Name:  KWSC vs JRSC FINAL.jpg
Views: 11444
Size:  195.2 KB

It should be noted that I can't fault Jackson Racing's offering much either - it's essentially the same. We did however, tune both the JR and KW SC its on the dyno at the same time within days of each other repeatedly and found that the charge temps were rising consistently higher (slightly, 3-5 degrees more) between runs in the JR kits. This might imply that the intercoolers are more efficient on the KWSC. Let's be clear here : I am in no way saying that the JR intercooler isn't efficient. I'm just saying it's marginally less efficient than that of the KW offering. Despite KW's 'noisy' cog issue (which they're working on) - cooling would make all the difference in a performance shootout.

While on the topic of cooling, this brings me to two other notable points.

Name:  Vortech COLD.jpg
Views: 6219
Size:  139.0 KB

^^^ 1) Remember that cold snap we had in Jan? Yeah, that "hell freezes over" weather? Well, the ambient temps in our dyno cell were close to freezing and we did a Vortech 10PSI calibration. This was the result (with 92 Octane). I've plotted it along side the other VT 10 PSI run with the HKS EL header for comparison but you now can see how temps can really skew your results. I didn't put this into the lot simply because I didn't feel that it was indicative of the kit and it certainly wasn't repeatable in warmer temperatures.

Name:  InnovateSC.jpg
Views: 6239
Size:  96.5 KB

^^^ This was an excruciatingly trying kit and amidst frustration following the install of the intercooler (and Raceseng 70mm pulley) for the Innovate kit, I had experienced all sorts of issues (or quirks) which we now know to be related to using an aftermarket OMNI MAP sensor. After conferring with @moto-mike , I was glad to know that I wasn't alone in this and being drained, I had Moto-East throw in one of their E-Tunes and finished the calibration after some logging on the dyno.

The point to be made in this last case : More costs (intercooler and pulley) and for a mere 20WHP and 15#s TQ difference makes this one of the worst price to performance options out there right now. Given the prices of the kit with the intercooler today, you'll be in turbo territory and hence have a wider and better range of performance offerings at your disposal. If you however choose this kit, I'd strongly suggest you hit @moto-mike up for one of his awesome dyno-proven calibrations!

My 2 cents, and take it for what it's worth!

Regards!


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC
Drift-Office is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 38 Users Say Thank You to Drift-Office For This Useful Post:
86-tundra (03-25-2014), BRZranger (03-25-2014), Bu-Tang (03-25-2014), Calum (03-25-2014), djdnz (03-25-2014), F1point4 (03-25-2014), FearBoy (03-25-2014), fenton (03-25-2014), FJ/BRZ (05-24-2014), flippy (03-13-2015), forzajuve (03-25-2014), glamcem (03-25-2014), GTHachiRoku (03-26-2014), Hachiroku14 (03-25-2014), Hanni_0176 (03-25-2014), hmong337 (03-25-2014), illmatic (03-25-2014), industrial (03-26-2014), johnnie (03-25-2014), Jrdad (03-25-2014), JS + BRZ (03-25-2014), kbogarto (03-25-2014), lucid215 (07-14-2014), Mad1723 (03-26-2014), MadFRS (03-25-2014), Pete156 (03-25-2014), Ralph Spoilsport (03-25-2014), Robftss (03-25-2014), rs999 (09-12-2014), Scottemad123 (03-25-2014), Sportsguy83 (03-25-2014), stockysnail (03-25-2014), surfuxalot (06-17-2015), swarb (03-14-2015), Touge_ninja (03-25-2014), Toyota86.ir (02-13-2016), WRB5titch (03-25-2014), Yamaha_R6 (03-25-2014)
Old 03-25-2014, 04:50 AM   #2
glamcem
Senior Member
 
glamcem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ Limited
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,553
Thanks: 997
Thanked 607 Times in 404 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
yesss
glamcem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 05:13 AM   #3
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,176 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
What were the peak charge temps you saw for each kit?

Also, is there any reason the Jackson Racing kit redlines at 7k vs the 7.4k on the Vortech and Kraftwerks?
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 05:16 AM   #4
Drift-Office
Senior Member
 
Drift-Office's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: AE86 / FRS / FC3S / GC8 / S14 / R32
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 789
Thanks: 633
Thanked 1,431 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
What were the peak charge temps you saw for each kit?
I'll have to look over the logs but I remember it to be 3-5 more at the end of the runs. And this was done in low 50-ish degree weather...


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC
Drift-Office is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 07:48 AM   #5
F1point4
Photo Specialist
 
F1point4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 DGM 6MT
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 587
Thanked 1,802 Times in 420 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Bob, thanks again for the visibility into the kits, love seeing your posts. May I ask why the kW/jr rotrex kits fall so hard around 7k?

Cheers,
Victor
F1point4 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to F1point4 For This Useful Post:
Drift-Office (03-25-2014)
Old 03-25-2014, 10:21 AM   #6
TRD_07
Senior Member
 
TRD_07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Firestorm 6MT
Location: Texas
Posts: 456
Thanks: 435
Thanked 115 Times in 94 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^Looks like both the Vortech and Jackson kits were running a HKS EL header except the KW.
TRD_07 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TRD_07 For This Useful Post:
Drift-Office (03-25-2014)
Old 03-25-2014, 10:33 AM   #7
OrbitalEllipses
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,889 Times in 2,902 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by F1point4 View Post
Bob, thanks again for the visibility into the kits, love seeing your posts. May I ask why the kW/jr rotrex kits fall so hard around 7k?

Cheers,
Victor
As the two Rotrex units are the same between the kits, they should perform rather similarly. There is no perfect compressor - I'd say they're beginning to max out. IIRC, at least one of the two companies already said they built the kit in mind with the possibility for a larger Rotrex unit. The included units are a smaller sized Rotrex.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRD_07 View Post
^Looks like both the Vortech and Jackson kits were running a HKS EL header except the KW.
That's what it looks like. I could not find evidence of a HKS EL or other header in the link Bob provided to the original dyno of the KW kit. Interesting that the same blower (KW and JR use the same Rotrex), on the same dyno, make similar power albeit one has a header and one does not.

Still want to see these SC kits with the Nameless header if possible...looks like it'd fit with the JR.

Last edited by OrbitalEllipses; 03-25-2014 at 10:56 AM. Reason: ~clarity y'all~
OrbitalEllipses is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to OrbitalEllipses For This Useful Post:
Drift-Office (03-25-2014), TRD_07 (03-25-2014)
Old 03-25-2014, 10:48 AM   #8
TRD_07
Senior Member
 
TRD_07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Firestorm 6MT
Location: Texas
Posts: 456
Thanks: 435
Thanked 115 Times in 94 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I could not find evidence of a HKS EL or other header in the link Bob provided to the original dyno. Interesting that the same blower (KW and JR use the same Rotrex), on the same dyno, make similar power albeit one has a header and one does not.

Looks like its stated in the dyno graph itself unless that's an error?
TRD_07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 10:56 AM   #9
OrbitalEllipses
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,889 Times in 2,902 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
My bad, I was talking about the KraftWerks kit - let me edit that for clarity.
OrbitalEllipses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 11:00 AM   #10
digital_assassin
Senior Member
 
digital_assassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Drives: 2013 FR-S Matte Orange
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,016
Thanks: 489
Thanked 937 Times in 507 Posts
Mentioned: 168 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
If the JR kit is Sam's car then it does have a header. Cant recall if HKS.

Nevermind - listed on the sheet
digital_assassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 11:06 AM   #11
stockysnail
Just the tip
 
stockysnail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 Lightning Red Subaru BRZ Mt Lt
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 2,716
Thanks: 636
Thanked 1,004 Times in 665 Posts
Mentioned: 176 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
For those curious to know what was on the Innovate kitted car, just look at my build thread in my signature as that was my car. Frustrating to find out all the 'quirks' about the kit but I bought it used for $1200 less than retail so I'm not too disappointed. Bob's link is to my pre/post intercooler/70mm pulley with tune results.

And Bob was great. If his shop was closer I'd visit all the time.
stockysnail is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stockysnail For This Useful Post:
Drift-Office (03-25-2014)
Old 03-25-2014, 11:06 AM   #12
Model Citizen
Lacking brains
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: frz
Location: Ma
Posts: 730
Thanks: 180
Thanked 825 Times in 328 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
from what i remember reading the jr kit had header and full exhaust, car was catless. Kw kit was on stock header, op, fp (hi flow cat), and catback.
Model Citizen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 11:30 AM   #13
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,867 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
The intercooled innovate kit looks great until about 5k rpm. I wish we could get some more info on the 210+ to see if it can keep up with the others past that point.

Also, I'd love to see what else the HKS SC kit could do. Evasive has posted some dynos in the 300 whp range but it's hard to compare with other kits without have comparisons like this. Also the new updated HKS looked to have even better output than the first version.

There's still too much in the pipe line for me to make a decision yet.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 12:29 PM   #14
OrbitalEllipses
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,889 Times in 2,902 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
There's still too much in the pipe line for me to make a decision yet.
Takes ~4 years for everything to come to market and get documented on a new platform.
OrbitalEllipses is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OrbitalEllipses For This Useful Post:
Calum (03-25-2014)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Drift-Office : UEL Shootout! (Borla vs JDL vs RWorks) Drift-Office Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 74 06-02-2015 06:50 PM
Drift-Office : 86 Nights #2! Drift-Office Northwest 72 10-23-2013 03:39 AM
Drift-Office : Vortech SC with and without Header - Case Study / Discussion? Drift-Office Forced Induction 14 09-27-2013 09:16 AM
Drift-Office : Vortech / HKS EL / Perrin / Greddy Installed & Tuned! Drift-Office Forced Induction 8 09-03-2013 06:20 PM
Drift-Office : Vortech / Perrin Combo Installed & Tuned! Drift-Office Forced Induction 44 08-06-2013 06:37 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.