|
Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
05-07-2015, 07:29 PM | #15 | |
Project BRZ-Boosted Autos
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: MY14 BRZ
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
Thanks: 15
Thanked 154 Times in 45 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Check out my ProjectBRZ YouTube Channel and Facebook Page for the latest reviews, guides and information. |
|
05-07-2015, 09:57 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: RX-7 / BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 2,343
Thanks: 1,026
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,081 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The non-linear airflow delivery also makes the centrifugal supercharger better-suited to drag racing, because the graduated boost application enables an easier launch, with greater power coming on as the rpm increases. Of course, with peak boost not occurring until redline, the blower's effectiveness is not fully realized at lower rpm. In other words, unless you're performing full-throttle launches at every stop light, you're not going to feel the maximum punch of a centrifugal blower. That's not to say centrifugals are weak on the street. We've driven a number of ProCharger-blown '10 Camaros, and they're admirably powerful. But there's no denying that more torque delivered lower in the rpm band would help overcome the Fifth Gens' considerable mass." Copy paste-ta~~~
__________________
//2013 World Rally Blue BRZ Limited FBM Turbo--gone
//2018 Crystal White Pearl BRZ Ts 2.2l Harrop Supercharged |
|
05-07-2015, 10:02 PM | #17 | |
Project BRZ-Boosted Autos
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: MY14 BRZ
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
Thanks: 15
Thanked 154 Times in 45 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Centrifugal increases in a linear fashion, directly proportionally to engine speed. Sounds like we are both saying the same thing, but our use of the term "linear" differs.
__________________
Check out my ProjectBRZ YouTube Channel and Facebook Page for the latest reviews, guides and information. |
|
05-07-2015, 10:19 PM | #18 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
@King Tut defines linear as a flat (zero slope) torque curve. You define linear as a flat (straight line) power curve. Both are linear, in their own right. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | D_Thissen (05-07-2015) |
05-07-2015, 10:20 PM | #19 | |
Project BRZ-Boosted Autos
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: MY14 BRZ
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
Thanks: 15
Thanked 154 Times in 45 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Check out my ProjectBRZ YouTube Channel and Facebook Page for the latest reviews, guides and information. |
|
05-08-2015, 10:33 AM | #20 | |
NASA SpecE30 Racer
|
Quote:
f(x) = ax + b; f(x) = HP a = slope x = RPM b = intercept which in our case is zero because at 0 RPM you make 0 HP Now here are two points pulled from your graph: 82KW = a3500RPM + 0; a = 0.02343 184KW = a6000RPM + 0; a = 0.03067 The slopes are not equal, which means that the horsepower curve is not linear. When torque becomes a constant or a flat line as @CSG Mike put it, then horsepower increases with RPM at a linear rate and the slope along the horsepower curve will be the same everywhere. That is the definition of linear, and it will not be achieved with an increasing boost/torque curve from a centrifugal supercharger.
__________________
- King Tut
Street/Track Car: 2006 Honda S2000 TT3 || Race Car: 1987 BMW 325is SpecE30 || Tow Vehicle: 2014 RAM 1500 EcoDiesel Sold Cars: 2012 BMW M3 || 2013 Subaru BRZ || 2012 Porsche Cayman R || 2009 Chevrolet Z06 || 2009 BMW M3 || 2004 BMW M3 || 2004 Nissan 350Z |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to King Tut For This Useful Post: | protpibe (05-08-2015) |
05-08-2015, 10:45 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S Argento
Location: Westport,CT
Posts: 1,855
Thanks: 517
Thanked 1,039 Times in 616 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
^ THIS This is something I mention over and over - dyno graphs do not depict throttle response. Specifically turbos will have no where near the response of a supercharger - quick throttle response makes a car more fun to drive, feel more powerful, easier to fine tune at the limit, etc. Yes, you cannot beat a well designed turbo kit for efficiency, but even the best factory engineered 'lag free' turbo systems will have a 'soft' throttle response, and typically aftermarket turbo kits will have discernible turbo lag... especially when transitioning from no load to full load in the lower RPM band. At 3000 RPM, until the turbo get's spinning I'd wager even the centrifugal units out there will feel more responsive. The PD units will feel downright beastly - which is why people are often pretty happy with the smaller Sprintex units. On 91 they're only around 240whp or under on a dyno, but they are very responsive and pull pretty hard down low. |
The Following User Says Thank You to bfrank1972 For This Useful Post: | CSG Mike (05-08-2015) |
05-08-2015, 02:08 PM | #22 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
If you do some regression analysis, a straight line is a far better fit than a curve, assuming we ignore the part up top where timing is pulled. |
|
05-08-2015, 02:32 PM | #23 | |
NASA SpecE30 Racer
|
Quote:
f(x) = ax + b; f(x) = HP a = slope x = RPM b = intercept which in our case is zero because at 0 RPM you make 0 HP 212KW = a7100RPM + 0 a = 0.02986 So our simplified linear horsepower curve will look like this: HP = .02986 * RPM Let's plug in the values I used earlier: HP = .02986 * 3500RPM HP = 104.5 KW HP = .02986 * 6000RPM HP = 179.2 KW Linear values = 104.5 KW and 179.2 KW Graph values = 82 KW and 184 KW So the 3500 RPM point is 22 KW off what it should be if linear power was being delivered. It isn't there because there is only 3 PSI of boost at that point where there is 11 PSI of boost at the horsepower peak. I am not saying that isn't a nice looking graph. It is a nice graph. I just don't like people saying a centrifugal supercharger delivers linear power.
__________________
- King Tut
Street/Track Car: 2006 Honda S2000 TT3 || Race Car: 1987 BMW 325is SpecE30 || Tow Vehicle: 2014 RAM 1500 EcoDiesel Sold Cars: 2012 BMW M3 || 2013 Subaru BRZ || 2012 Porsche Cayman R || 2009 Chevrolet Z06 || 2009 BMW M3 || 2004 BMW M3 || 2004 Nissan 350Z |
|
05-08-2015, 10:29 PM | #24 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
2k = ~50hp 3k = ~100hp 4k = ~155hp 5k = ~220hp 6k = ~290hp 7k = ~350hp And for a FA20... While 0rpm = 0 hp, the reasoning behind your math is flawed. Take any hp graph, and if you extrapolate 0 rpm, it will be negative hp. Going back to a linear regression-ish analysis, using this graph. 2k = ~40hp 3k = ~85hp Δ45hp 4k = ~125hp Δ40hp 5k = ~165hp Δ35hp 6k = ~200hp Δ35hp 7k = ~230hp Δ30hp I mean, literally, hold a piece of paper up to the graphs, and compare the line to the edge of the paper... Last edited by CSG Mike; 05-08-2015 at 10:41 PM. |
|
05-08-2015, 10:56 PM | #25 | |
NASA SpecE30 Racer
|
Quote:
The real thing we are discussing is how flat the torque curve is. A turbo can get the boost up and produce a flatter wider torque curve.
__________________
- King Tut
Street/Track Car: 2006 Honda S2000 TT3 || Race Car: 1987 BMW 325is SpecE30 || Tow Vehicle: 2014 RAM 1500 EcoDiesel Sold Cars: 2012 BMW M3 || 2013 Subaru BRZ || 2012 Porsche Cayman R || 2009 Chevrolet Z06 || 2009 BMW M3 || 2004 BMW M3 || 2004 Nissan 350Z |
|
05-08-2015, 11:01 PM | #26 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
05-08-2015, 11:09 PM | #27 |
NASA SpecE30 Racer
|
The issue is that torque curves are used along with RPM to calculate the power so if the torque curve is not flat then by default the power curve becomes less linear as it introduces a variable into the equation instead of being a constant. It doesn't matter how constant the slope of the torque curve is as to the linearity of the power curve because it is still a variable instead of a constant.
__________________
- King Tut
Street/Track Car: 2006 Honda S2000 TT3 || Race Car: 1987 BMW 325is SpecE30 || Tow Vehicle: 2014 RAM 1500 EcoDiesel Sold Cars: 2012 BMW M3 || 2013 Subaru BRZ || 2012 Porsche Cayman R || 2009 Chevrolet Z06 || 2009 BMW M3 || 2004 BMW M3 || 2004 Nissan 350Z |
05-08-2015, 11:21 PM | #28 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Tags |
boost, choosing, forced, supercharger, turbo |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
>>> Guide to Choosing Automotive HID & LED Lighting ~ *Make an Informed Decision* | KI_ZN6 | Announcements, Contests, Giveaways | 16 | 12-07-2015 02:54 AM |
HKS Supercharger V2 vs. Greddy Turbo Kit vs. Crawford Turbo Kit | Ogremair | Forced Induction | 27 | 09-10-2015 04:39 AM |
Turbo or Supercharger? | GLee | Forced Induction | 14 | 05-31-2014 08:26 PM |
HKS Supercharger / Avo Turbo Kit / Greddy Turbo Kit - All Available at Import DPS!! | rickspecd | Forced Induction | 4 | 07-12-2013 11:50 AM |
Looking for a Frs for R&D on a turbo and supercharger | Toxic | Forced Induction | 38 | 10-23-2012 03:13 PM |