follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List
go_a_way1

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-15-2015, 07:08 PM   #1
FT-86 SpeedFactory
 
FT-86 SpeedFactory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 7,694
Thanks: 1,298
Thanked 3,578 Times in 1,253 Posts
Mentioned: 341 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
FT-86 SpeedFactory LCA by Verus - Lightest LCA for the Twins - Development Thread

We have been working on several projects with Velox and will be unveiling them over the next few weeks. First up we have a new LCA that is in development and soon undergoing testing on a couple time attack cars.

There are a lot of options out there when it comes to Lower Control Arms for the twins. You have simple units like the SPC arms all the way up to full CNC Aluminum ones as we'll see below.

The factory lower control arm as I am sure you all know lacks any sort of camber adjustment. This does not work very well for those of us who decide to lower the vehicle or do any sort of motorsports with the car. Working with Velox it was decided to completely redesign the LCA to reduce the most amount of unsprung weight possible, give racers a lightweight and durable solution.

To get started we got 3D models of the OEM unit.


So how can this be improved upon?

1. Weight: Lighter than the OEM and other aftermarket units. This helped us determine which material to use.

2. Packaging: We wanted our LCA to retain OEM mounting points. This allows the LCA to be used on a stock suspension set-up , as well as coilovers, and not lower the rear of the vehicle like other units geared more towards stance. This is what ruled out the above design.

3. Manufacturing: We decided early on that we wanted a machined component. With a cut, bent, and welded steel unit, tolerances are looser and heavily dependent on the shop doing the work. On the other hand, a modern CNC machine can hit tolerances tighter than 0.005″ without breaking a sweat.

4. Strength: We knew we wanted a LCA that was ready to hit the track. From daily drivers, to enthusiasts, to all out time attack cars, this LCA had to be handle the punishment.

Several ideas were constructed but weight was still a tad high.



A finial design was settled upon once more weight savings was created.


Everything has been created via 3D models from OEM supplied 3D data. It doesn't get any more precise then this guys.

The stock LCA overlaid on ours.


Stay tuned as we test tension, deflection, and overall strength.
FT-86 SpeedFactory is offline  
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to FT-86 SpeedFactory For This Useful Post:
8R6 (02-15-2015), akyp (02-16-2015), Black Tire (02-15-2015), DAEMANO (02-17-2015), D_Thissen (02-15-2015), flippy (07-21-2015), FutureFT86 (08-28-2016), GT86_PRAGUE (09-28-2015), Guff (03-15-2015), JonAvalon (02-15-2015), JS + BRZ (03-24-2015), kask2_6.0 (02-15-2015), KR-S (12-05-2015), kster1 (02-16-2015), Lawnik (03-17-2015), themajesticone (02-16-2015), WallsAndFoundations (03-21-2015), was385 (02-15-2015), WillRacer1jz (08-21-2015)
Old 02-15-2015, 07:15 PM   #2
was385
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: MT WRB BRZ Limited, 2007 911s
Location: CT
Posts: 812
Thanks: 218
Thanked 381 Times in 181 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Will this be available with poly bushings for us autox guys? Any idea on price range or guess on when they'll be available? Looks good.
was385 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to was385 For This Useful Post:
JohnJuan (02-17-2015)
Old 02-15-2015, 07:30 PM   #3
Mad1723
Senior Member
 
Mad1723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Asphalt FR-S
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 654
Thanks: 822
Thanked 418 Times in 222 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
No toe adjustment out of the box like the SPC?
Mad1723 is offline  
Old 02-15-2015, 07:50 PM   #4
FT-86 SpeedFactory
 
FT-86 SpeedFactory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 7,694
Thanks: 1,298
Thanked 3,578 Times in 1,253 Posts
Mentioned: 341 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad1723 View Post
No toe adjustment out of the box like the SPC?
Toe is controlled by a completely different arm. SPC provides a bushing you have to have pressed out of the factory toe arm and then press in their bushing in order to get toe adjustment. SPC is also stamped steal arm that uses a bolt for camber adjustment that can slip under heavy load.

Factory toe adjustment we have found to be plenty for our racing applications.
FT-86 SpeedFactory is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to FT-86 SpeedFactory For This Useful Post:
Mad1723 (02-15-2015)
Old 02-15-2015, 08:23 PM   #5
Mad1723
Senior Member
 
Mad1723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Asphalt FR-S
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 654
Thanks: 822
Thanked 418 Times in 222 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FT-86 SpeedFactory View Post
Toe is controlled by a completely different arm. SPC provides a bushing you have to have pressed out of the factory toe arm and then press in their bushing in order to get toe adjustment. SPC is also stamped steal arm that uses a bolt for camber adjustment that can slip under heavy load.

Factory toe adjustment we have found to be plenty for our racing applications.
Good to know. I'll keep an eye on this
Mad1723 is offline  
Old 02-15-2015, 08:34 PM   #6
D_Thissen
Senior Member
 
D_Thissen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: '13 Argento FR-S (Sold)
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 3,209
Thanked 1,439 Times in 855 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Looks awesome guys. Any idea of a price range or release date?
__________________
D_Thissen is offline  
Old 02-15-2015, 09:53 PM   #7
cdrazic93
Junior
 
cdrazic93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: a car
Location: Probably at school
Posts: 4,341
Thanks: 3,184
Thanked 2,512 Times in 1,502 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
+1
__________________
"Ah! What music! They could have never imagined, those pioneers who invented the automobile, that it would posses us like this, our imaginations, our dreams. Men love women, but even more than that, men love CARS!"-Lord Hesketh
cdrazic93 is offline  
Old 02-15-2015, 10:02 PM   #8
s2d4
Senior Member
 
s2d4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: R32 GTR, AW11 MR2 SC, GTS86 R
Location: OZ
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 603
Thanked 1,223 Times in 708 Posts
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Can this be adjusted on the car or will it be like the Cusco ones?
__________________
s2d4 is offline  
Old 02-16-2015, 01:17 AM   #9
akyp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2012 86
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 303
Thanks: 559
Thanked 114 Times in 65 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mounting hole for the sensor of self-leveling headlamps on GT86?
akyp is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to akyp For This Useful Post:
Captain Snooze (02-16-2015)
Old 02-16-2015, 02:45 AM   #10
eric6
Senior Member
 
eric6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 93 MR2 Turbo; 2014 BRZ
Location: United States
Posts: 328
Thanks: 143
Thanked 492 Times in 193 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by s2d4 View Post
Can this be adjusted on the car or will it be like the Cusco ones?
They are designed to be adjusted on car. If significant adjustment is needed, it will be suggested to thread the adjuster out and thread the rod end in. This is to ensure that the threads won't get stripped out. The instructions will have further information on this subject.

Quote:
Originally Posted by akyp View Post
Mounting hole for the sensor of self-leveling headlamps on GT86?
Not currently, but something we can definitely discuss.
eric6 is offline  
Old 02-16-2015, 02:49 AM   #11
eric6
Senior Member
 
eric6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 93 MR2 Turbo; 2014 BRZ
Location: United States
Posts: 328
Thanks: 143
Thanked 492 Times in 193 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Thissen View Post
Looks awesome guys. Any idea of a price range or release date?
I'll let @FT-86 SpeedFactory answer those questions with numerical answers. I can comment on the pricing... it will be competitive with what's on the market now.
eric6 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to eric6 For This Useful Post:
D_Thissen (02-16-2015)
Old 02-16-2015, 03:17 AM   #12
swarb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: BRZ
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,053
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 2,451 Times in 1,271 Posts
Mentioned: 79 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
6061? 7075? heat treated?
Looks good!
swarb is offline  
Old 02-16-2015, 09:19 AM   #13
was385
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: MT WRB BRZ Limited, 2007 911s
Location: CT
Posts: 812
Thanks: 218
Thanked 381 Times in 181 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric6 View Post
I'll let @FT-86 SpeedFactory answer those questions with numerical answers. I can comment on the pricing... it will be competitive with what's on the market now.
Will this also have an option for rubber or poly bushings to keep STX legality for autox?
was385 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to was385 For This Useful Post:
D_Thissen (02-16-2015), wparsons (02-16-2015)
Old 02-16-2015, 10:20 AM   #14
eric6
Senior Member
 
eric6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 93 MR2 Turbo; 2014 BRZ
Location: United States
Posts: 328
Thanks: 143
Thanked 492 Times in 193 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by swarb View Post
6061? 7075? heat treated?
Looks good!
The materials is roughly 25% stronger then 6061-T6 but weaker then 7075. 7075 would put us out of price range for most customers. We have thought about running a few sets from 7075 for the time attack guys pushing 2+ G in turns, just as an added safety margin.

Quote:
Originally Posted by was385 View Post
Will this also have an option for rubber or poly bushings to keep STX legality for autox?
Currently, it will not. Another thing we can discuss before the production run.

Last edited by eric6; 02-16-2015 at 10:35 AM.
eric6 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to eric6 For This Useful Post:
JohnJuan (02-17-2015), swarb (02-16-2015)
 
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Verus Engineering Rear Wing Development VerusEric Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 203 07-05-2021 09:15 AM
Verus' Shop BRZ - Development Thread VerusEric Member's Car Journals 266 12-19-2019 04:12 PM
FT-86 SpeedFactory Diffuser by Verus - Complete Aero Solution FT-86 SpeedFactory Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 574 09-15-2019 10:10 AM
FT-86 SpeedFactory Turbo Kit - Development and Testing FT-86 SpeedFactory Forced Induction 271 09-19-2017 11:07 PM
Front Wheel Deflectors - FT-86 SpeedFactory by Verus Engineering VerusEric Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 25 09-22-2016 01:41 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.