follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions

Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-10-2013, 03:52 PM   #57
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,794
Thanks: 2,164
Thanked 4,242 Times in 2,220 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Re_Invention View Post
Pound for pound, I see Honda and Toyota being the only two top tier Japanese brands - apples to apples. Responding to global markets/anticipating trends, running successful profitable companies, maintaining brand involvement/recognition, miscellaneous development (aircraft, hybrid, robotics, technology). Nissan/Renault alliance was consciously removed from the equation.

If opening up to other manufactures, I'd throw my hat in the Mazda ring for being consistently the sportiest, with also among the most questionable quality, and in dire financial straits post Ford breakup.

LFA was left out because you could technically not purchase one (right?), very few were made, and in no way does it fall under the affordable category regardless of what comparison you are making to its competitors.
Sounds like your argument is actually that the decline of sporty/affordable cars at Honda has not been any worse than at Toyota. I might actually agree with that, but that's not what my original point was. I was talking about the decline of sporty/affordable cars at Honda in absolute terms, which I think is difficult to argue against. Hell, you even have Honda making statements about re-introducing sporty cars from its past (S2000, NSX) and vowing to be competitive again with cars like the (discountinued but soon to be re-released) Civic Type-R. Confessions don't get more clear than that.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 04:10 PM   #58
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,351 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimpo View Post
The S2000 used an inline 4 (not to mention that the original 2.0L made 240HP without direct injection), and it seems to handle okie dokie
Stock vs stock the S2k has better weight distribution (only slightly, but still better) AND a lower hood/fender line than the FRS/BRZ.

Since the I4 is narrower they can lay it down on an angle to reduce the height it needs (which is what they did in the S2k), it's all about creative packaging.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 08:48 AM   #59
Chimpo
Senior Member
 
Chimpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: '15 STi Ltd
Location: Probably a location near you!
Posts: 297
Thanks: 37
Thanked 149 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomato86 View Post
The s2000, NSX, etc. were not built in Ohio. I'm not sure why you keep harping on building cars in Ohio. They've never built a car like this (the new NSX) in Ohio. Nissan builds the GT-R in Tochigi, etc. I don't trust it, and have my reasons. Disagree all you want but many have the same viewpoint. Honda is being cheap and that's why they're building the car in Ohio, not because of "R&D"

Please spare me the historic lessons, I was once a Honda fanboy (Del Sol, FA5 Si, etc.)
I never said those, or all of Honda's cars, were built in Ohio. My point is that being built in Ohio is not a bad thing in itself. So what if it's cheaper to build a car here than Japan? It's a business, and making money is the point. Why did the cost of your example GT-R go up? Is it because it's vasatly superior to last year's model... nope... they want money. The Yen is strong, the dollar is not. It cost more to build it in Japan, so up goes the price. Lot's of foreign makers (not just Honda, and not just Japanese brands) are ramping up NA production for cost effectiveness. Business 101.

I still have friends that work for Honda. They know they need to reverse course, but it doesn't happen over night. It takes years (and no, mild cosmetic refreshes on the Civic after a bad year isn't what I'm talking about). I've heard some hints at what's coming (I'm no longer in the know since I'm at a different OEM) but I'm excited/hopeful for them.

Another point is the with the 86 clones. If "built in Japan" is so superior, how come they have so many problems with them? Honestly the last couple Hondas I've owned have been, hands down, tighter / rattle free / better built (admittedly one was built in Japan, the other in Canada)... both of which were first year cars. Point is while there is nothing wrong with being built in Japan (or anywhere), it doesn't mean it's automatically immune to quality issues.

I owned a '99 Accord V6 that was built completely (engine / trans / car) in Ohio with 250k miles on it. Besides timing belts / other basic maintainence, it needed an alternator and a drive belt tensioner. That's not poorly built meng. Car ran great when I sold it.

And I still don't get why you think they're so incapable of builing a sports car in the states / NA. The NSX is getting a dedicated plant. Engineers travel. Meetings can be had with Japan on a daily basis. There will be bumps with out a doubt, but there will be guidance and perseverence. And no, that doesn't mean the Japanese will have to save the Americans from themselves. Honda has a company moto: "one team." Honda is a fly on the wall when compared to the size of Toyota, or GM or VAG and must be completely unified in what they do.

Food for thought: is it looking down upon NA manufacturing that they didn't build the lower volume / specialty cars here, or is it trusting NA manufacturing to handle the high volume cars that ultimately keep the company going? How many S2Ks/RSXs/TSXs were sold versus Accords? Versus Civics? The NA built cars are the ones that are in the hands of the people making Honda's reputation. For every one of the previous NSXs sold, there were a thousand NA built civics sold. * I made that ratio up, but you get my point*

You may not like Honda's direction at this moment, and that's fine, but there is nothing wrong with an NSX being built in Ohio, or America.

Let's agree to disagree. :happy0180:

Last edited by Chimpo; 06-11-2013 at 09:14 AM.
Chimpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 09:54 AM   #60
tomato86
Senior Member
 
tomato86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S | '08 Evo [Sold]
Location: MD
Posts: 280
Thanks: 168
Thanked 85 Times in 56 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimpo View Post
I never said those, or all of Honda's cars, were built in Ohio. My point is that being built in Ohio is not a bad thing in itself. So what if it's cheaper to build a car here than Japan? It's a business, and making money is the point. Why did the cost of your example GT-R go up? Is it because it's vasatly superior to last year's model... nope... they want money. The Yen is strong, the dollar is not. It cost more to build it in Japan, so up goes the price. Lot's of foreign makers (not just Honda, and not just Japanese brands) are ramping up NA production for cost effectiveness. Business 101.

I still have friends that work for Honda. They know they need to reverse course, but it doesn't happen over night. It takes years (and no, mild cosmetic refreshes on the Civic after a bad year isn't what I'm talking about). I've heard some hints at what's coming (I'm no longer in the know since I'm at a different OEM) but I'm excited/hopeful for them.

Another point is the with the 86 clones. If "built in Japan" is so superior, how come they have so many problems with them? Honestly the last couple Hondas I've owned have been, hands down, tighter / rattle free / better built (admittedly one was built in Japan, the other in Canada)... both of which were first year cars. Point is while there is nothing wrong with being built in Japan (or anywhere), it doesn't mean it's automatically immune to quality issues.

I owned a '99 Accord V6 that was built completely (engine / trans / car) in Ohio with 250k miles on it. Besides timing belts / other basic maintainence, it needed an alternator and a drive belt tensioner. That's not poorly built meng. Car ran great when I sold it.

And I still don't get why you think they're so incapable of builing a sports car in the states / NA. The NSX is getting a dedicated plant. Engineers travel. Meetings can be had with Japan on a daily basis. There will be bumps with out a doubt, but there will be guidance and perseverence. And no, that doesn't mean the Japanese will have to save the Americans from themselves. Honda has a company moto: "one team." Honda is a fly on the wall when compared to the size of Toyota, or GM or VAG and must be completely unified in what they do.

Food for thought: is it looking down upon NA manufacturing that they didn't build the lower volume / specialty cars here, or is it trusting NA manufacturing to handle the high volume cars that ultimately keep the company going? How many S2Ks/RSXs/TSXs were sold versus Accords? Versus Civics? The NA built cars are the ones that are in the hands of the people making Honda's reputation. For every one of the previous NSXs sold, there were a thousand NA built civics sold. * I made that ratio up, but you get my point*

You may not like Honda's direction at this moment, and that's fine, but there is nothing wrong with an NSX being built in Ohio, or America.

Let's agree to disagree. :happy0180:
Well for one, I was just pointing to the fact that yes, the performance models have historically been built in Japan. Lot of people were discussing heritage, how it's important, how this will be the first big time performance car Honda has ever made, in Ohio. EVERYTHING else was built in Tochigi or Suzuka, specialty areas with expertise and access to places like Suzuka Circuit. Now I'm sure there are a bunch of track facilities there so I'm not knocking the setup. Just something to think about. I can imagine Porsche guys becoming upset if Porsche announced they were going to start building the Carrera in Texas, or Vette guys crying foul that Chevy would start making them in the UK.

My Evo X didn't have that many problems. I had a first year, and the steering wheel sensor had to be fixed, a fuel line had to be 'tweaked', and a couple other small time things. For the FR-S, the tail lights and fuel pump so far. Made in Japan isn't perfect but the FR-S runs fine, and I paid a whopping $0.00 to have it fixed. Unlike an Accord or Civic, this is a completely new car with new tech from the ground up. Difference in manufacturing and expertise.

Honda has the guns to make a 86 killer but bean counters are killing them.

:happy0180:
tomato86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 10:23 AM   #61
Chimpo
Senior Member
 
Chimpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: '15 STi Ltd
Location: Probably a location near you!
Posts: 297
Thanks: 37
Thanked 149 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomato86 View Post

Honda has the guns to make a 86 killer but bean counters are killing them.

:happy0180:
Let's hope for less gun control
Chimpo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chimpo For This Useful Post:
tomato86 (06-11-2013)
Old 06-13-2013, 05:13 PM   #62
Vmax911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: WRB BRZ
Location: ABQ
Posts: 354
Thanks: 38
Thanked 89 Times in 58 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
This thread makes me tired...

On topic, I test drove a '12 civic si when car shopping. It felt alright, got loud when you got on it. Seemed well built, nice transmission. But the gimicky VTEC light and crazy cockpit layout made it a no go for me.
Vmax911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 05:16 PM   #63
DeeezNuuuts83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 2006 Evo IX SE
Location: Southern California
Posts: 997
Thanks: 115
Thanked 254 Times in 170 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Things like that really make me question the companies and the people who they put in charge. Seriously, who at Honda thought that this was a good idea? It's not as if they are building these cars for 15 year-olds who fall for that kind of crap. It's way worse than the G-meter gauge in the Nissan Sentra a few years ago.
DeeezNuuuts83 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2013 Honda Civic Si Sedan vs 2013 Subaru BRZ Neo Zuko FR-S / BRZ vs.... 232 04-11-2014 10:45 AM
test drove both 86 and brz same day! leoz1412 AFRICA 33 02-06-2013 07:12 AM
test drove both 86 and brz same day! leoz1412 AFRICA 0 02-03-2013 01:52 PM
test drove both 86 and brz same day! leoz1412 AFRICA 0 02-03-2013 01:51 PM
Anyone test drove an AT? geero Southern California 6 08-09-2012 09:55 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.