N/A or N/A? - Page 2 - Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community

OldSkoolToys · 01-21-2010, 11:14 PM

n/a is neck and neck with n/a.

Its a close battle!

Siriusly.Andrew · 01-21-2010, 11:43 PM

Just Because, Im going to break even with NA!!

EDIT :: I've never drank my coffee black on purpose, but its happened. I can confirm that I've crapped lightning... and I have dreams of fighting economical crime with some crazy green leotards!
dunno about spit fire, but I've had a wicked case of projectile vomit after drinking too much straight liquor.

Franisco · 01-22-2010, 12:09 AM

If its like the F20C, twin-charge..

Jordo! · 01-22-2010, 01:04 AM

N/A??? Are you high? Is this getting a big block V8 or something?

stevens8 · 01-22-2010, 11:10 AM

I don't know very much about subaru/toyotas but I wonder if this motor will respond well to bolt ons? I've owned an rsx for about 3 years and from the different mods i've done, it responds pretty well to just bolt ons. If this thing could make 200-210whp with just bolt ons and a tune that would be nice.

RegisBou · 01-22-2010, 03:04 PM

It might not respond as well since the engine will be super engineered. They will try to squeeze every last bit of HP until emissions is a problem.

I'm guessing if it comes out with 203bhp then I/H/E would be around a 10-20 whp bump? Making it close to 200whp if not more

?

Equal length headers, nothing larger than 2.25", intake (take your pic) or ITB's, Single exit exhaust (more flow), a pro-tune with 91,93, or E85, and some drivetrain stuff you should IMO have a great car.

Imagine 220whp without fail wheel drive

I have it too and well i'm tired of pulling

RegisBou · 01-22-2010, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordo!

N/A??? Are you high? Is this getting a big block V8 or something?

For the target weight of the car...its pretty f'n similar

Jordo! · 01-22-2010, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RegisBou

For the target weight of the car...its pretty f'n similar

Eh... not quite. It's going to need around 1 - 1.2 bhp per 10 lb of vehicle to piss off the guys in Mustangs and Camaros.

Last I heard, the turboed version will be in that ball park, but not N/A.

Even better would be 1 - 1.2 whp per 10 lb.

Axel · 01-22-2010, 06:59 PM

I'd take a N/A version... if it was 285 hp, lightweight, and sat low in the frame...

Since that isn't bloody likely... FA all the way!

plus FA is probably cheaper, more reliable, and produces power throughout the curve...

Jordo! · 01-22-2010, 07:17 PM

^^^ Not to mention that if the motor can handle boost and it's already turboed, it's not all that hard to increase the power.

N/A power upgrades tend to be pricey (and relatively minimal) on a small motor that's already been well tuned from the factory.

Axel · 01-23-2010, 09:31 AM

I've discovered OldSkoolToys previously secret n/a dream car project being displayed at TAS !! (I think Captain Planet helped him with it!) Now, if it had a FI engine it might be able to chase down the wienermobile...

S2KtoFT86 · 01-23-2010, 11:37 AM

Boo N/A, boost all the way!!

zbirdman777 · 01-23-2010, 02:49 PM

Tie breaker!!!! We had a swing vote and now N/A is ahead!

Matador · 01-23-2010, 04:14 PM

Quick, somebody Vote N/A!!!!!!!!!!!

View Poll Results: N/A?
Yes	35	55.56%
Yes	28	44.44%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

01-23-2010, 11:37 AM	#26
S2KtoFT86 Resident Post Whore Join Date: Oct 2009 Drives: 2022 WR BRZ Location: Hickory, NC Posts: 1,116 Thanks: 0 Thanked 55 Times in 54 Posts Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Boo N/A, boost all the way!! __________________ Gavin

01-21-2010, 11:43 PM	#16
Siriusly.Andrew Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Drives: 1995 Civic DX Location: Fort St. John BC CAN Posts: 557 Thanks: 0 Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Just Because, Im going to break even with NA!! EDIT :: I've never drank my coffee black on purpose, but its happened. I can confirm that I've crapped lightning... and I have dreams of fighting economical crime with some crazy green leotards! dunno about spit fire, but I've had a wicked case of projectile vomit after drinking too much straight liquor.

01-22-2010, 01:04 AM	#18
Jordo! Enjoy it, destroy it. Join Date: Oct 2009 Drives: Datsun Racing Hen Location: Blank Generation Posts: 820 Thanks: 6 Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Tagged: 2 Thread(s)	N/A??? Are you high? Is this getting a big block V8 or something?

01-22-2010, 11:10 AM	#19
stevens8 Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Drives: '12 WRX Location: Indiana Posts: 100 Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	I don't know very much about subaru/toyotas but I wonder if this motor will respond well to bolt ons? I've owned an rsx for about 3 years and from the different mods i've done, it responds pretty well to just bolt ons. If this thing could make 200-210whp with just bolt ons and a tune that would be nice.

01-22-2010, 03:04 PM	#20
RegisBou Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Drives: Scion xA, Toyota MkI Mr2 (Sold) Location: Northern Virginia Posts: 171 Thanks: 1 Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	It might not respond as well since the engine will be super engineered. They will try to squeeze every last bit of HP until emissions is a problem. I'm guessing if it comes out with 203bhp then I/H/E would be around a 10-20 whp bump? Making it close to 200whp if not more ? Equal length headers, nothing larger than 2.25", intake (take your pic) or ITB's, Single exit exhaust (more flow), a pro-tune with 91,93, or E85, and some drivetrain stuff you should IMO have a great car. Imagine 220whp without fail wheel drive I have it too and well i'm tired of pulling

01-22-2010, 06:59 PM	#23
Axel Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Drives: '13 BRZ Location: Charlotte, NC Posts: 672 Thanks: 120 Thanked 357 Times in 152 Posts Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	I'd take a N/A version... if it was 285 hp, lightweight, and sat low in the frame... Since that isn't bloody likely... FA all the way! plus FA is probably cheaper, more reliable, and produces power throughout the curve...

01-22-2010, 07:17 PM	#24
Jordo! Enjoy it, destroy it. Join Date: Oct 2009 Drives: Datsun Racing Hen Location: Blank Generation Posts: 820 Thanks: 6 Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Tagged: 2 Thread(s)	^^^ Not to mention that if the motor can handle boost and it's already turboed, it's not all that hard to increase the power. N/A power upgrades tend to be pricey (and relatively minimal) on a small motor that's already been well tuned from the factory.

01-23-2010, 09:31 AM	#25
Axel Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Drives: '13 BRZ Location: Charlotte, NC Posts: 672 Thanks: 120 Thanked 357 Times in 152 Posts Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	I've discovered OldSkoolToys previously secret n/a dream car project being displayed at TAS !! (I think Captain Planet helped him with it!) Now, if it had a FI engine it might be able to chase down the wienermobile...

01-23-2010, 02:49 PM	#27
zbirdman777 86 Addict Join Date: Oct 2009 Drives: 2009 Scion tC Location: Lubbock, TX Posts: 89 Thanks: 0 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Tie breaker!!!! We had a swing vote and now N/A is ahead!

01-23-2010, 04:14 PM	#28
Matador hashiryu Join Date: Nov 2009 Drives: Mk4 Supra Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay Posts: 2,567 Thanks: 18 Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Quick, somebody Vote N/A!!!!!!!!!!!

User Name		Remember Me?
Password