|
Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86 |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
04-25-2012, 11:15 PM | #15 |
Corner Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 11 STI, 99 RS
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,908
Thanks: 129
Thanked 1,519 Times in 701 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Dropping 400rpm in favor of .5L of displacement is a worthwhile trade, in my opinion. Peak torque and hp aren't in that 400rpm anyways.
I don't think it'd take much to get that .5L either, or bring much of a weight penalty. I believe the 2.0L was chosen for mileage and emissions reasons. |
04-25-2012, 11:16 PM | #16 | ||
Site Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,965
Thanks: 7,663
Thanked 19,051 Times in 8,326 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
"If you look just the number for this car, it's nothing special. We can explain to media for an hr and they would not get how great this car really is. So we gave up talking and give them the keys and let the car talk to them. After they drive the car, most of them don't have any words to explain it." I gonna say the same thing. Drive this car. I don't care FRS or BRZ. See if this car really is gutless. So called "need more power." After you test drive this car and you still think it needs turbo, supercharger, NOS, dynamite, go for it. Quote:
|
||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ichitaka05 For This Useful Post: | Dark (04-25-2012), Grateful Dave (04-26-2012) |
04-25-2012, 11:21 PM | #17 |
ft86club resident b-boy
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Yamaha R3, moonslate 2018 GT Black
Location: LA Area So Cal
Posts: 1,214
Thanks: 142
Thanked 208 Times in 101 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
not me either. and dare i say it, those that prefer high revs probably out number those that prefer more torque on this board, and in all sports car circles outside the domestic muscle car crowd.
|
04-25-2012, 11:22 PM | #18 |
Elite Padawan
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: '15 WRX, 15 GLA250, and 2 feet
Location: Shoreline, WA
Posts: 3,498
Thanks: 197
Thanked 250 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Without driving the car, we can't jump to conclusion like that.
Heck, I want more rpm. 7400rpm is fine, but 8000rpm would be perfect.
__________________
Dark
|
04-25-2012, 11:26 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ PP
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,525
Thanks: 1,702
Thanked 646 Times in 317 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Now I think the FA20 will be much more to my liking with more torque down low but an "FA25" would have me feeling much more at ease about it. I value the handling much more than power and I in fact prefer less power. But I just don't want to put my foot to the floor and go, "Oh God, where is the power!? Am I even moving?" *Looks out the window* "Yeah, I guess I am moving."
__________________
Toyota + Subaru =
|
|
04-25-2012, 11:30 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ PP
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,525
Thanks: 1,702
Thanked 646 Times in 317 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Toyota + Subaru =
|
|
04-25-2012, 11:31 PM | #21 |
ZC6A2B82KC7J
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2002 WRX
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,632
Thanks: 361
Thanked 727 Times in 236 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
One of the reviews (I forget which one) described the Frs as "the world's slowest superbike." I don't think anyone would suggest that a superbike manufacturer reduce the rpm of their engine for better around town drivability. I don't think the Frs should be any different. If you want loads of torque so you don't have to downshift so much, there are plenty of cars that offer that. This car is focused on delivering the best, most fun and visceral driving experience, and a high revving NA engine is part of that.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Spaceywilly For This Useful Post: | Quentin (04-27-2012) |
04-25-2012, 11:35 PM | #22 |
Kuruma Otaku
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
FA24 94mm bore from FB25 86mm stroke from FA20. +1mm FA20 valves, 1.5mm more lift, D4-S, CR reduced to 12.0:1.
~30 more lb-ft ~20 more bhp no revs lost. Win-win.
__________________
Because titanium. |
04-25-2012, 11:42 PM | #23 | |
86 Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
04-25-2012, 11:45 PM | #24 | |
Site Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,965
Thanks: 7,663
Thanked 19,051 Times in 8,326 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Now I know how Tada-san & other Toyota rep felt every time media ask about supercharger & turbo for this car... and be glad Tsuchiya-san isn't here, cuz Tsuchiya-san have yelled & scolded (& that's a true story). |
|
04-25-2012, 11:47 PM | #25 | |
86 Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
04-25-2012, 11:49 PM | #26 | |
86 Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
04-25-2012, 11:55 PM | #27 | |
Kuruma Otaku
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I think it will be a top class low/high compromise. But still a compromise. The reviews all seem to point that the chassis can handle a dump of more power/tq so why not give it to it? (See my above solution.)
__________________
Because titanium. |
|
04-25-2012, 11:57 PM | #28 | ||
Site Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,965
Thanks: 7,663
Thanked 19,051 Times in 8,326 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
This is absolute loose-loose debate here. I'm done. When you guys drive this car take a pic or vid of you driving and truly feel this car lack TQ, I say "Sorry about that, let's go look at 370Z, V6 GC or do you prefer 2.0T? Maybe Mustang." |
||
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finally! First Scion FR-S test drive review (Automobile) | Mess11 | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 102 | 01-28-2012 09:24 PM |
Subaru BRZ First Drive Review by Automobile Magazine - "A Great Drive" | Sport-Tech | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics | 36 | 12-07-2011 03:13 PM |
By Design: Toyota FT-86, Back to the Future, Again (March Automobile Mag Article) | Axel | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 14 | 02-26-2010 01:54 PM |