|
BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-27-2013, 09:59 AM | #57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2014 Jeep Wrangler RubiconX
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 1,282
Thanks: 110
Thanked 292 Times in 224 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Regardless, I enjoyed the parts of the video I watched. I always enjoy comparisons of all types, especially when modifications are thrown in so you can see possibilities of various car types with modifications since I modify all my sports cars. |
|
11-27-2013, 11:46 AM | #58 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: '13 BRZ, '06 997, Other Things(TM)
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,078
Thanks: 1,715
Thanked 670 Times in 351 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I don't know: I don't find my BRZ as it's currently set up to be any different from most of the other RWD cars I drive frequently, but maybe that's because exactly none of those cars have stock suspensions. The one exception I'd throw in is the 911, which you just drive a bit differently and which generates absurd amounts of grip coming out of corners. That has its own wet-weather concerns, though. |
|
11-27-2013, 07:23 PM | #59 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Subaru BRZ Sport Tech Satin White
Location: Calgary, Alberta,Canada
Posts: 1,228
Thanks: 147
Thanked 320 Times in 225 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
But the BRZ is tail happy and slow as a result. If you turn sharply and floor the throttle in first gear it will not be able to put the power down. If traction control is on it will cut the throttle abruptly, if traction control is off the car gets sideways and wastes power with wheelspin. If the road is wet this is worse. If it is snowy you will be doing a 180 inside the car's own length. THAT'S terminal oversteer and it is SLOW. Now how this has been achieved is an interesting question because if we can figure it out we can correct it and make the car as quick as it should be but isn't. It isn't roll bar stiffness. It isn't spring rate. It has to be rear suspension geometry. What's got me curious is why front camber is basically zero and rear camber is one degree negative but it still oversteers under power: http://www.tunehouse.com.au/archives...-story-begins/ I mean you expect this on a car with lots of engine torque, but the BRZ hasn't got any so why the imbalance front to rear and what happens to the camber or toe at the rear when you step on the gas ? |
|
11-28-2013, 06:58 AM | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: GT86 Cosworth
Location: UK
Posts: 753
Thanks: 361
Thanked 270 Times in 188 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
The litchfield performance handling pack consists or springs, roll bars and their completely custom alignment settings.
|
11-28-2013, 08:33 AM | #61 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Subaru BRZ Sport Tech Satin White
Location: Calgary, Alberta,Canada
Posts: 1,228
Thanks: 147
Thanked 320 Times in 225 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Maybe they didn't tune the bump stops accordingly or maybe the rear suspension geometry is just incorrect as I am beginning to suspect. With this oversteer issue corrected the BRZ with the Litchfieid kit should be more competitive with the Cayman. I think the Cayman S has a bit too much more power for the Litchfield as tuned. |
|
11-28-2013, 08:33 AM | #62 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Subaru BRZ Sport Tech Satin White
Location: Calgary, Alberta,Canada
Posts: 1,228
Thanks: 147
Thanked 320 Times in 225 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Maybe they didn't tune the bump stops accordingly or maybe the rear suspension geometry is just incorrect as I am beginning to suspect. With this oversteer issue corrected, the BRZ with the Litchfield kit should be more competitive with the Cayman. I think the Cayman S has a bit too much more power for the Litchfield as tuned. |
|
11-29-2013, 03:58 AM | #63 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: '13 BRZ, '06 997, Other Things(TM)
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,078
Thanks: 1,715
Thanked 670 Times in 351 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I'm sure they set the front to zero camber with more camber at the back so that people would hopefully get into less trouble with the cars, since they knew they were catering to a certain demographic. It's obviously a tunable behavior because my car with new sways, springs and dampers behaves nothing like the car did on the stock suspension. I really don't think the behavior you're describing is something inherent to the chassis, except insofar as it's a RWD car and RWD cars can hang the tail out if you drive like a magazine reviewer. |
|
11-29-2013, 08:12 AM | #64 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Subaru BRZ Sport Tech Satin White
Location: Calgary, Alberta,Canada
Posts: 1,228
Thanks: 147
Thanked 320 Times in 225 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
All road cars understeer. The BRZ oversteers much too readily when you apply full power in low gears. That is slow and represents a defect in the chassis from the perspective of a serious driver. I am sure this is a deliberate design feature.
A car with only 150 lb ft of peak torque should not power oversteer. This is the reason the BRZ performs poorly when driven hard on a track. If you have cured this oversteer by adding roll bars and coilovers then this power oversteer is caused by roll rates being too high at the rear. I doubt this is the case. I doubt you have cured this defect. With better tires I expect the oversteer to be diminished or perhaps disappear due to tire grip overcoming the oversteer. I intend to try this first. That doesn't solve the ridiculous instability on ice, snow or very wet roads though. That's as clear as I can make this. I am not alone in identifying this chassis fault. So far I've seen nobody has found a solution. If this car is to work with forced induction then something will need to be done, again only gift serious drivers. How our novice drivers are managing this car is an interesting question. An MX5 is easier to drive and, I suspect, quicker round a track. |
11-29-2013, 08:59 AM | #65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 Raven 86
Location: Dubai
Posts: 166
Thanks: 28
Thanked 62 Times in 39 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Would be nice to have a suspension guru chime in on what Suberman is saying
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk |
11-29-2013, 09:43 AM | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,794
Thanks: 2,164
Thanked 4,242 Times in 2,220 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
I'm not a suspension guru, but I've driven this car a number of times at the track. It's subjective in some ways how you want a chassis setup (some people prefer more oversteer, some more understeer), but for the general population, I'd say his statements are not true.
My guess is that Suberman prefers heavily understeering RWD cars that you can just plant your foot with coming out of turns. Something like an open-differential Genesis Coupe with TC on. Or better yet, an AWD car. The type of chassis balance he's describing is more inline with my old STI at the track. Nothing wrong with that btw just preference, but I think most enthusiasts like cars that are more balanced. - Saying a car with 150 lbs-ft torque shouldn't power oversteer is a bit narrow-sighted, as it's necessary to also consider gearing and RPMs. 150 lbs-ft at a high enough RPM and with the right gearing can result in a fair amount of torque to the ground. That's what really matters, not arbitrary peak torque output of the engine. - From my experience, the FR-S actually handles very well when pushed hard at the track. In fact, the harder you push it, the more you realize how good the chassis is. The stock balance of the FR-S leans towards slight understeer, but you can easily balance the car with the throttle if you're experienced with RWD cars (which is exactly what you want IMO). - When the rear end comes around under power with this car, it is very easy to catch. It's one of the easiest RWD cars I've driven in this regard, and it will make you look better than you really are at the track. - I don't know why Suberman wants a RWD car that won't break traction "when you apply full power in low gears" and turn the wheel. Nearly every RWD car will do this if there's no stability control or TC interfering. - An MX5 is definitely not quicker around a track (there are lots of tests out there on this). It may be easier to drive, but from my experience, it really depends which year and what options you're referring to (LSD option, sport suspension?) One of the best videos on this topic is of Randy Pobst driving the BRZ around Laguna Seca in MT's Best Driver's Car competition. Try watching that - he goes on and on about the beautiful balance and precision of the BRZ when pushed hard.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."
2022 BRZ Build 2013 FR-S Build |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MVP Track Time 2013 Great Lakes/Midwest Track Dates | Feffman | Great Lakes | 5 | 09-07-2013 01:39 PM |
First Track day of this year *Pissing rain* | AJ PwR | Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting | 12 | 04-19-2013 02:13 PM |
FR-S/BRZ Named Finalist for 2013 World Car of Year and 2013 Best Performance Car | Hachiroku | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 11 | 02-08-2013 03:34 PM |
2013 SA Car of Year finalists | CoBrA788 | AFRICA | 13 | 01-13-2013 02:13 AM |
Motortrend - 2013 Car of the Year | RaceR | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 6 | 11-10-2012 03:59 PM |