08-20-2016, 02:15 PM | #71 | |
Road-hole
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
it's not the only way, it's the easiest way...
Quote:
You can change the valve timing increasing lift or duration to increase engine flow at lower rpms also, or use a bigger less restrictive exhaust, but the easiest way is to increase the effective displacement by increasing boost earlier in the rpm range. If you do that by getting a smaller, quicker spooling FI system, then you don't have the same airflow from the FI system. By using compound boost, you can increase the effective displacement by using a quicker spooling turbo or pos. disp. s/c behind a bigger turbo to up the boost and increase the effective displacement allowing the engine to swallow more air and by doing so you aren't decreasing the FI airflow by using a smaller quicker spooling turbo as the source of FI airflow. That's because in a compound boost system, you cannot have any more airflow than your primary FI system, the one that takes air from the atmosphere, provides. Jaden oh and yes, in a gas powered low displacement engine, that is the ONLY reason to compound charge it. In diesels that can take more total boost than a single turbo can efficiently provide, it's to increase the boost beyond the capability of a single turbo. p.s. one other thing to keep in mind with high boost FI is that because the charge is flowing faster, retrictions like exhaust and valve timing typically have to be reduced/changed along with boost increases because they become greater restrictions the faster the flow through the engine is. That's why you won't always see a truly linear increase with boost increases even if you are providing more airflow with higher boost. If conjunctive restrictions are greater, then you will see greater gains and if they are less or you don't also change the restrictions, you'll see lesser gains than the boost will dictate. It becomes VERY complex which is why a lot of people get confused by the actual results. Last edited by Jaden; 08-20-2016 at 03:00 PM. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jaden For This Useful Post: | FRS Justin (08-20-2016) |
08-20-2016, 02:19 PM | #72 |
Junior
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: a car
Location: Probably at school
Posts: 4,341
Thanks: 3,184
Thanked 2,512 Times in 1,502 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
oh sweet jesus, lots of juicy ban material I hope. This is great! very entertaining
__________________
"Ah! What music! They could have never imagined, those pioneers who invented the automobile, that it would posses us like this, our imaginations, our dreams. Men love women, but even more than that, men love CARS!"-Lord Hesketh
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cdrazic93 For This Useful Post: | Dipstik-sportech (08-20-2016) |
08-20-2016, 02:24 PM | #73 |
Road-hole
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Glad I can entertain you...
|
08-20-2016, 06:52 PM | #74 |
Sporadic Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Drives: 2016 Halo FR-S M/T
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,145
Thanks: 5,221
Thanked 3,552 Times in 1,746 Posts
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 33 Thread(s)
|
Honestly Jaden, if you're that confident both in your abilities and your theories that it works, then instead of insulting half the subforum, why not actually make it happen and prove that it really does work? I'm not sure what you expect to gain by continuing to argue with others.
To be honest, I was more interested in your plan to swap an Ecoboost V6 into your FR-S than I am with this project. |
The Following User Says Thank You to KR-S For This Useful Post: | weederr33 (08-20-2016) |
08-20-2016, 07:13 PM | #75 |
Airborne at your service
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: '17 BRZ Series.Yellow
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 6,325
Thanks: 4,528
Thanked 5,586 Times in 2,928 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
I want to see a Rav4 V6 swap in our cars. That would be cool.
Then twin-charge it
__________________
|
The Following User Says Thank You to weederr33 For This Useful Post: | KR-S (08-20-2016) |
08-20-2016, 07:25 PM | #76 | |
Sporadic Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Drives: 2016 Halo FR-S M/T
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,145
Thanks: 5,221
Thanked 3,552 Times in 1,746 Posts
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 33 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
- Lamborghini V12 swap - Audi/Lamborghini 5.2L V10 w/ Twin Turbo - Viper V10 swap - 1GZ-FE swap - 426 Hemi swap - Second FA20 installed behind front seats (Audi TT Bimoto style) - Bugatti Veyron W16 swap + AWD - Jet engine swap In all seriousness though, I really am more interested in an Ecoboost swap. Perhaps that has more potential for compound boost. |
|
08-20-2016, 07:50 PM | #77 | |
...Just add nauseum
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: 2003 (AP1) S2000
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 545
Thanks: 310
Thanked 784 Times in 335 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
It's 'cause Vit was right. And @CSG Mike is right
Quote:
If that doesn't wake you up, I don't know what will. More learning. Less declaring. Pressure does not equal density
__________________
Inline 4 is best 4
There are many ways to displace. -Spartarus |
|
08-20-2016, 10:38 PM | #78 | |
Road-hole
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
But I promise you that there was a lot more flow modifications done to that engine then just it running 6 PSI of boost. Vit and Mike are both full of shit because they're confusing turbo airflow with engine airflow. power generation is all about engine airflow. boost icreases engine airflow by raising the effective displacement.more psi equals more displacement jaden Last edited by Jaden; 08-20-2016 at 10:49 PM. |
|
08-20-2016, 11:00 PM | #79 | |
...Just add nauseum
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: 2003 (AP1) S2000
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 545
Thanks: 310
Thanked 784 Times in 335 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
More PSI does not mean more displacement, more mass means more displacement. They aren't full of shit. Why can one turbo make 300 WHP on 6 PSI, when another makes 250 on 7 PSI with the same intercooling, and the same AFR's? Boost is loosely correlated with charge density and airflow. It's one variable of many. Conceptually, though, you are in the ballpark about compound boost. You've got a few major misconceptions to correct.
__________________
Inline 4 is best 4
There are many ways to displace. -Spartarus Last edited by Spartarus; 08-20-2016 at 11:10 PM. |
|
08-20-2016, 11:08 PM | #80 | |
Road-hole
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
yes they are
Quote:
Because the airflow of the turbo is different and the valve lift and duration is different. but increasing turbo airflow has a limit that is defined by the displacement of the engine and the flow that the intake and exhaust components allow....higher boost increases the effective displacement which allows the engine to flow more air beyond the limits of the valve train and exhaust. jaden |
|
08-20-2016, 11:53 PM | #81 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,528
Thanks: 8,917
Thanked 14,175 Times in 6,834 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | Dipstik-sportech (08-20-2016), Spartarus (08-21-2016) |
08-20-2016, 11:55 PM | #82 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,528
Thanks: 8,917
Thanked 14,175 Times in 6,834 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I can increase boost by heating up the air. That increased boost still did not increase the mass of air going into the engine. I get 550whp out of a F20C with 9.5 psi of boost. |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | Dipstik-sportech (08-20-2016), Spartarus (08-21-2016) |
08-20-2016, 11:55 PM | #83 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,528
Thanks: 8,917
Thanked 14,175 Times in 6,834 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | Spartarus (08-21-2016) |
08-21-2016, 12:03 AM | #84 | |
...Just add nauseum
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: 2003 (AP1) S2000
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 545
Thanks: 310
Thanked 784 Times in 335 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Increasing boost to make the engine move more air only works if you're not losing density as fast as you're adding pressure. That's part of the reason why non-intercooled turbo setups have a huge diminishing return in power as you raise boost. Hence Mike's comment about cooling all of this boost. If you can't maintain charge density, all you're doing is moving vertically on the compressor map, pumping the same mass of air at an ever-increasing pressure ratio, and ever diminishing efficiency, until you cross the surge line. You won't actually get any more air mass into the cylinder. The rest of this chat is for another time and more beer. EDIT: Oh, that whole statement was redundant. Mike already proved my point. Throw out your intercooler, get an interheater. Yay boost! When it comes down to a choice between "many of those vastly experienced forced induction tuners must be full of shit" and "I may be misunderstanding things" What do you honestly think the right answer is?
__________________
Inline 4 is best 4
There are many ways to displace. -Spartarus |
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Spartarus For This Useful Post: |
|
|
Tags |
all talk no substance, everyone is wrong |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Digital boost gauge w/ vent pod grim speed boost controller | Meetjoeblack | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 0 | 03-09-2015 01:27 PM |
New Hawk HP + compound | Hyper4mance2k | Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting | 24 | 11-11-2014 11:05 AM |
help im really dumb i think!!! compound issue.. | nickmerronesucks | Cosmetic Maintenance (Wash, Wax, Detailing, Body Repairs) | 11 | 05-02-2014 03:53 PM |
new R compound from Maxxis | Matt Andrews | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 4 | 06-08-2012 02:27 PM |