follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-13-2019, 07:19 PM   #43
86MLR
Senior Member
 
86MLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Trucks, not new trucks, older trucks, a old truck will pump out 100x (guesstimate) more pollutants than a nee truck.

New trucks are usually hwy rigs, where big km and fuel consumption makes it viable to upgrade every few years.

Where do these trucks go, the cities, hauling containers aroind usually, from ports to commercial.

The Euros have got their shit sorted with emmisions, and rightly so.

The research and findings are oit there to back this up, unfortunately, for the local owner driver who ships your parts/clothes/furniture/food, a new truck every 5 years isn't financially viable.

The government should subsidize the cost, if they were serious about emmisions, but they seem just talk shit and look elsewhere for solutions that are logistically and financially troublesome, if not outright stupid.

What world will you leave for your grandchildren?

In the big picture, modern cars are just 1 drop in the ocean of pollutants we pump ot every day.

And don't get me started on population growth and how we have gone so far past the tipping point that we will be in for a real shit show in the future.

Yeah, go team human.
__________________
Disclaimer: This post represents the official views of the voices in my head at the time of posting.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133311
I'm only here for the biscuits
86MLR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2019, 08:31 PM   #44
weederr33
Airborne at your service
 
weederr33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: '17 BRZ Series.Yellow
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 6,325
Thanks: 4,528
Thanked 5,586 Times in 2,928 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
I bet the other is only legal in Nevada!
Hahaha nah it's legal in Texas too
__________________
Series.Yellowbird - http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=122135

MS, CSCS, TSAC-F, CPT
weederr33 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to weederr33 For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (03-14-2019)
Old 03-14-2019, 08:35 AM   #45
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86MLR View Post
Trucks, not new trucks, older trucks, a old truck will pump out 100x (guesstimate) more pollutants than a nee truck.

New trucks are usually hwy rigs, where big km and fuel consumption makes it viable to upgrade every few years.

Where do these trucks go, the cities, hauling containers aroind usually, from ports to commercial.

The Euros have got their shit sorted with emmisions, and rightly so.

The research and findings are oit there to back this up, unfortunately, for the local owner driver who ships your parts/clothes/furniture/food, a new truck every 5 years isn't financially viable.

The government should subsidize the cost, if they were serious about emmisions, but they seem just talk shit and look elsewhere for solutions that are logistically and financially troublesome, if not outright stupid.

What world will you leave for your grandchildren?

In the big picture, modern cars are just 1 drop in the ocean of pollutants we pump ot every day.

And don't get me started on population growth and how we have gone so far past the tipping point that we will be in for a real shit show in the future.

Yeah, go team human.

Large trucks make up about 7% of the North American vehicles and their emissions are more like 2 times that of cars not 100. Even the 2 times is deceiving since cars are worse during the warm up period and since the majority of drivers are going very short distances compared to the long drives of most trucks the total emissions are probably a wash.


Can't speak to European standards as I do not follow them.


Agreed that modern cars are a drop in the bucket but it is the very controls that people complain about that made it that way. If no changes were made back when they were we would probably be in pretty bad shape by now and the areas where people complain about the controls the most would be uninhabitable wastelands. I get that this can be hard for anybody under the age of about 50 to grasp since things have been so much better for their whole life but those of us that remember driving through a major urban center and half choking to death should understand what those emissions laws have done.


I repeat that I do not feel that the small number of modified cars are going to take us back to those day nor that some of the laws are effective or even rational but simply that the emissions have been reduced to a tolerable rate due to them.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
Dadhawk (03-14-2019), finch1750 (03-14-2019)
Old 03-14-2019, 11:16 AM   #46
Lincoln Logs
Senior Member
 
Lincoln Logs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Drives: #337 2017 Toyota 86
Location: San Diego
Posts: 225
Thanks: 32
Thanked 241 Times in 114 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I worked in and I still am a part of the automotive industry. There has been a huge shift in anything emissions related after the EPA dropped the hammer on Jegs and similar retailers. The reality is these parts WILL slowly disappear. No business in their right mind will risk being fined for making 20% margin on a header that sells for $500-600 dollars. The numbers do not add up.

To those running a completely catless set up, I got news for you. You're not making that much more power (if any) and I loath sitting behind you at a stop light. It smells, it's unnecessary and quite frankly makes no sense. Modern catalytic converters continue to improve at a rapid rate and hardly cause any major performance losses. The next generation of catalytic converters will out perform anything we've seen.

The stock front pipe, in my testing, shows zero restriction for my uses and I'd wager for 99% of folks out there. There IS a good reason to consider a catless header if you're spending a fair amount of time on track. Often manifolds with integrated catalytic converters, designed for warm up emissions, will melt after long track sessions. That is, however, a problem for a very small percentage of users.
Lincoln Logs is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lincoln Logs For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (03-14-2019)
Old 03-14-2019, 11:31 AM   #47
finch1750
Undisputed El Presidente
 
finch1750's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Zenki 37J ZN6
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 11,571
Thanks: 9,382
Thanked 9,397 Times in 5,261 Posts
Mentioned: 374 Post(s)
Tagged: 33 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by weederr33 View Post
Though honestly, I still feel I'd modify my car even with stricter emissions.
Like any law there will always be the rule breakers, but it helps keep enough in check that the modifying community don't really make a dent even I would think.

Quote:
Originally Posted by weederr33 View Post
I guess that proves the nanny state stereotype lol. Kidding. But I will point out that it's a place that at least 2 of my favorite hobbies have heavy restrictions. Cars being one.
IDK, for all the complaints about CA I drive my modified exhaust car while carrying my CCW without much issue lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincoln Logs View Post
I worked in and I still am a part of the automotive industry. There has been a huge shift in anything emissions related after the EPA dropped the hammer on Jegs and similar retailers. The reality is these parts WILL slowly disappear. No business in their right mind will risk being fined for making 20% margin on a header that sells for $500-600 dollars. The numbers do not add up.

To those running a completely catless set up, I got news for you. You're not making that much more power (if any) and I loath sitting behind you at a stop light. It smells, it's unnecessary and quite frankly makes no sense. Modern catalytic converters continue to improve at a rapid rate and hardly cause any major performance losses. The next generation of catalytic converters will out perform anything we've seen.

The stock front pipe, in my testing, shows zero restriction for my uses and I'd wager for 99% of folks out there. There IS a good reason to consider a catless header if you're spending a fair amount of time on track. Often manifolds with integrated catalytic converters, designed for warm up emissions, will melt after long track sessions. That is, however, a problem for a very small percentage of users.
This is why not being able to do a HFC kinda sucks even. I would guess more of the gain just comes from the increased diameter and maybe runner/collector design.

Maybe in a couple years I'll sell my header for a markup since it won't be available and just buy an HFC that I can gut when it blows out lol.
__________________

"Just like how a strut bar somehow enables you to corner 20MPH faster around a cloverleaf on-ramp, when the reality is, you can do it already but you just don't have to balls to do it." - CSG David
finch1750 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to finch1750 For This Useful Post:
e_lunatic (03-14-2019), weederr33 (03-14-2019)
Old 03-14-2019, 11:35 AM   #48
weederr33
Airborne at your service
 
weederr33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: '17 BRZ Series.Yellow
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 6,325
Thanks: 4,528
Thanked 5,586 Times in 2,928 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by finch1750 View Post
IDK, for all the complaints about CA I drive my modified exhaust car while carrying my CCW without much issue lol
lol speaking of CA laws
__________________
Series.Yellowbird - http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=122135

MS, CSCS, TSAC-F, CPT
weederr33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2019, 11:40 AM   #49
Lincoln Logs
Senior Member
 
Lincoln Logs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Drives: #337 2017 Toyota 86
Location: San Diego
Posts: 225
Thanks: 32
Thanked 241 Times in 114 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86MLR View Post
Don't they have the "motorsport only" clause?

That's how we roll here
Just as a little heads up, there is a reason we've seen the motorsports only clause disappear. It is no longer a valid excuse or way to keep yourself safe as a business. The EPA knows full well customers are buying those parts and putting them on road going cars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by finch1750 View Post
Like any law there will always be the rule breakers, but it helps keep enough in check that the modifying community don't really make a dent even I would think.


This is why not being able to do a HFC kinda sucks even. I would guess more of the gain just comes from the increased diameter and maybe runner/collector design.

Maybe in a couple years I'll sell my header for a markup since it won't be available and just buy an HFC that I can gut when it blows out lol.
You hit the nail on the head, gains are seen from runner/collector changes and diameter changes. In-fact, on my 2017 I barely saw any gains on E85 when I moved for a generic UEL header. Small change in the mid-range and nominal changes up top. The OEMs are getting better and better even with the emissions compromises they have to make.
Lincoln Logs is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lincoln Logs For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (03-14-2019)
Old 03-14-2019, 12:52 PM   #50
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by finch1750 View Post
Like any law there will always be the rule breakers, but it helps keep enough in check that the modifying community don't really make a dent even I would think.

.
That was the point I was trying to make where everybody kept saying "but XXX is polluting as well". The laws are there to keep the majority of the cars clean and the few that decide to break it are not causing any real issue. They just need to get over the fact that the law does exist and isn't going away so if they chose to break it then any ramifications are on them. Just like speeding or illegal parking or anything else there will be some that feel it is unfair and they should be able to do whatever they want. Unfortunately if everybody does what ever they want things rarely go well.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
finch1750 (03-14-2019), strat61caster (03-14-2019)
Old 03-14-2019, 02:11 PM   #51
max20s14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Drives: 14' Raven M/T - 02' is300
Location: alabama
Posts: 161
Thanks: 45
Thanked 28 Times in 21 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
They still have turbo kits for sale that don't have cats.
max20s14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2019, 05:47 PM   #52
86MLR
Senior Member
 
86MLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
Large trucks make up about 7% of the North American vehicles and their emissions are more like 2 times that of cars not 100. Even the 2 times is deceiving since cars are worse during the warm up period and since the majority of drivers are going very short distances compared to the long drives of most trucks the total emissions are probably a wash.


Can't speak to European standards as I do not follow them.


Agreed that modern cars are a drop in the bucket but it is the very controls that people complain about that made it that way. If no changes were made back when they were we would probably be in pretty bad shape by now and the areas where people complain about the controls the most would be uninhabitable wastelands. I get that this can be hard for anybody under the age of about 50 to grasp since things have been so much better for their whole life but those of us that remember driving through a major urban center and half choking to death should understand what those emissions laws have done.


I repeat that I do not feel that the small number of modified cars are going to take us back to those day nor that some of the laws are effective or even rational but simply that the emissions have been reduced to a tolerable rate due to them.
Here in Sydney Australia there is massive smog on the hwys, all the 10 year and older trucks are choking up the main arterials, basically from Ports Botany heading in every direction.

Sections of roads are signed "Windows up and turn your aircon to recycle".

It might be different where you are but here, with all the old trucks running from the port it is atrocious.

Disclaimer: I am by no means stupid enough to not know that we need trucks, its the soot blowing old beasts I have a issue with.
I also acknowledge that transport only plays a minor part, but it could be much smaller.

The main issue is being able to afford the new "clean" trucks

100 × was wrong, 60 x ???, this report is better at explaining it, minus my over opinionated views, LOL >
Attached Images
File Type: pdf 596_trucking_fleet_overview.pdf (2.19 MB, 84 views)
__________________
Disclaimer: This post represents the official views of the voices in my head at the time of posting.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133311
I'm only here for the biscuits
86MLR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 86MLR For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (03-14-2019), weederr33 (03-14-2019)
Old 03-14-2019, 06:53 PM   #53
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86MLR View Post
Here in Sydney Australia there is massive smog on the hwys, all the 10 year and older trucks are choking up the main arterials, basically from Ports Botany heading in every direction.

Sections of roads are signed "Windows up and turn your aircon to recycle".

It might be different where you are but here, with all the old trucks running from the port it is atrocious.

Disclaimer: I am by no means stupid enough to not know that we need trucks, its the soot blowing old beasts I have a issue with.
I also acknowledge that transport only plays a minor part, but it could be much smaller.

The main issue is being able to afford the new "clean" trucks

100 × was wrong, 60 x ???, this report is better at explaining it, minus my over opinionated views, LOL >
They imposed some pretty hefty emission controls on truck here about 10 years ago so the really bad ones are all gone by now.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
86MLR (03-14-2019)
Old 03-15-2019, 03:46 AM   #54
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Tcoat: but aren't those old trucks now replaced with fad of "coal rollers" with modded tracks to spew black smoke near hybrids?
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FT86 Speedfactory CATLESS header Varelco Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 0 02-21-2017 06:13 AM
vendor on here that sells xxr's? Marcoscrdo Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 2 04-11-2014 01:08 PM
anyone know who sells this? yugiooh Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 13 11-16-2013 11:23 AM
** Just released & available - CUSCO FT86 REAL CARBON FIBER ITEMS!!! 468Power Exterior Parts - The Rest 2 10-02-2013 02:01 PM
Just released & available - CUSCO FT86 REAL CARBON FIBER INTERIOR ITEMS!!! 468Power Interior Parts (Incl. Lighting) 1 07-03-2013 08:58 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.