follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-29-2014, 09:21 AM   #57
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,351 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by calmtigers View Post
Have you got the chance to drive around and get a feel of what is different / changed?
I've put a lot of km's on it, but all highway. It's a long weekend up here, and the roads where I could normally have a bit of fun were either packed or too many cops to really let it go.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 10:50 AM   #58
Trac Toy
Senior Member
 
Trac Toy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Durham Region, Canukistan.
Posts: 506
Thanks: 224
Thanked 154 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Probably too little too late, but any chance in getting involved in this testing?

Oft header
Invidia overpipe
Invidia catted down pipe
Invidia N1
Stock intake with snorkel mod still using the stock air filter

Going lapping at Mosport on Monday.
__________________
.o0+Eric+0o.
2016 Chrysler 200S 3.6
2013 FRS 6MT
Trac Toy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 11:35 AM   #59
BolognaWalrus
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: too soon junior
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 88
Thanks: 60
Thanked 42 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Will these new maps come with LC/FFS for the b01c roms?
BolognaWalrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 04:18 PM   #60
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,351 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trac Toy View Post
Probably too little too late, but any chance in getting involved in this testing?

Oft header
Invidia overpipe
Invidia catted down pipe
Invidia N1
Stock intake with snorkel mod still using the stock air filter

Going lapping at Mosport on Monday.
IMO, it's too soon in the beta to take it lapping. I would at least wait for the first round of testers to send back feedback and logs.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 05:18 PM   #61
Trac Toy
Senior Member
 
Trac Toy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Durham Region, Canukistan.
Posts: 506
Thanks: 224
Thanked 154 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wparsons View Post
IMO, it's too soon in the beta to take it lapping. I would at least wait for the first round of testers to send back feedback and logs.

Yeah, I suppose...
__________________
.o0+Eric+0o.
2016 Chrysler 200S 3.6
2013 FRS 6MT
Trac Toy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 07:47 PM   #62
phobos512
Senior Member
 
phobos512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 2014 FR-S 6MT Whiteout
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 950
Thanks: 234
Thanked 374 Times in 260 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Hey...so...question. I am uploading files to my OFT right now and it says my cal is B00C but the files on it in the "Upload Data" page are all titled B01C (these were the autogenerated files from the OFT). So, for the beta, do I use B00C or B01C?

EDIT
I may have answered my own question...When I select the B01C file inside OFM I get an error "The selected file is not compliant" so I'm guessing that means the B00C file is correct and it just internally names everything B01C as that's the latest rev of the base ROM on which everything is based? Looking for some confirmation so I don't blow my car up
__________________
Matt | '14 FR-S 6MT Whiteout | '13 Sonata Hybrid | '11 CBR1000RR

Last edited by phobos512; 06-29-2014 at 08:01 PM.
phobos512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 08:11 PM   #63
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phobos512 View Post
Hey...so...question. I am uploading files to my OFT right now and it says my cal is B00C but the files on it in the "Upload Data" page are all titled B01C (these were the autogenerated files from the OFT). So, for the beta, do I use B00C or B01C?

EDIT
I may have answered my own question...When I select the B01C file inside OFM I get an error "The selected file is not compliant" so I'm guessing that means the B00C file is correct and it just internally names everything B01C as that's the latest rev of the base ROM on which everything is based? Looking for some confirmation so I don't blow my car up
you won't blow up your car loading any calid from 700C 900C A00C A01C B00C or B01C as they are all compatible for USA Manual cars.

OFT just "makes" you to your original calid as stored in the OFT for safety so you don't load say a D series for a auto in a manual (or an overseas rom that metric) and as part of their procedure to stop your OFT being used on multiple cars at once.

Just load the calid as per what your original ROM is as I understand it it will be the same ROM anyway just the internal calid will be changed to match the original. ie even A guy on 700C will effectively load same ROM with calid changed internally to 700C
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 10:39 AM   #64
jaf89f
Member
 
jaf89f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Raven MT
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 85
Thanks: 27
Thanked 26 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Just logged some miles and WOT pulls early Sunday morning and should have the file to @shiv sometime later tonight.
jaf89f is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 03:34 PM   #65
ScionFrsFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: America
Posts: 702
Thanks: 274
Thanked 119 Times in 79 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Does anyone know how long the beta testing typically last? lol

Excited to see if i feel anything different on new E85 tune !
__________________
ScionFrsFan
ScionFrsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 04:46 AM   #66
vgarcin
Swiss Alps Driver
 
vgarcin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: Toyota gt86
Location: Geneva
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 75 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScionFrsFan View Post
Does anyone know how long the beta testing typically last? lol

Excited to see if i feel anything different on new E85 tune !
From what shiv said, E85 maps have barely been modified, so you should not expect any gain.

@shiv@vishnu

Why aren't you planning to do E85 Stage 1 maps? I know that stage 2 are somewhat compatible with a non modified Header, but it still makes me worried to have this compromise.
vgarcin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014, 07:03 PM   #67
keen as
Senior Member
 
keen as's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 86 GT MT
Location: Sydney
Posts: 176
Thanks: 256
Thanked 80 Times in 45 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Hopefully E85 tune improves cold weather starting. I've had some cold winter mornings in Sydney.
keen as is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014, 09:55 PM   #68
phobos512
Senior Member
 
phobos512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 2014 FR-S 6MT Whiteout
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 950
Thanks: 234
Thanked 374 Times in 260 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vgarcin View Post
From what shiv said, E85 maps have barely been modified, so you should not expect any gain.

@shiv@vishnu

Why aren't you planning to do E85 Stage 1 maps? I know that stage 2 are somewhat compatible with a non modified Header, but it still makes me worried to have this compromise.
They can only test what they have available to them in house. I'm sure if someone with a Stage 1 configuration showed up on E85 they'd be more than happy to generate a specific tune file. Just sayin...
__________________
Matt | '14 FR-S 6MT Whiteout | '13 Sonata Hybrid | '11 CBR1000RR
phobos512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014, 10:58 PM   #69
Tromatic
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: FR-S
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,232
Thanks: 61
Thanked 1,728 Times in 786 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phobos512 View Post
They can only test what they have available to them in house. I'm sure if someone with a Stage 1 configuration showed up on E85 they'd be more than happy to generate a specific tune file. Just sayin...
I'm fairly sure they have that sort of thing covered.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
I've only dyno tested Stage 1 v1.6 and it made a 5-6whp more than Stage 1 v1.69. Drove smoother and was a bit more refined as well. Less induction noise at WOT in the 2500-3000rpm range too.
Shiv
Must be patient....
Tromatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014, 11:59 PM   #70
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phobos512 View Post
They can only test what they have available to them in house. I'm sure if someone with a Stage 1 configuration showed up on E85 they'd be more than happy to generate a specific tune file. Just sayin...
If you look at the differences between stage1 and 2 gas maps they add some extra fuel and a bit more timing ie as a result of headers.

Their wont be any problem with the extra timing advance on E85 as it has more than enough octane rating for na cars even at about E50 so having a car without catless headers will be fine on an E85 tune. As for the fueling it will be adjusted by the fuel trims which it already doing to compensate for the differing e% of the various e85 mix,s. According to Shiv its godd for e60 to E85 so the slight fueling difference required for headers or no headers will be taken care of. So basicly I dont believe it would not rearly need any further adjustment.
Plenty of people on the e85 tune with stock cars



y ad
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OpenFlash Tablet v1.42b maps now available Shiv@Openflash Software Tuning 159 09-13-2016 12:29 AM
Openflash Tablet v1.31 beta maps (including Stage 2!) now available for download Shiv@Openflash Software Tuning 354 02-08-2015 05:23 PM
OpenFlash Tablet E85 (and gasoline) Maps now available Shiv@Openflash Software Tuning 401 08-13-2014 11:14 PM
Now Available: OpenFlash Tablet Datalogging/Datagraphing (BETA Release) Shiv@Openflash Software Tuning 255 02-15-2014 04:43 AM
OpenFlash Tablet: USDM Stage 2 EL/UEL testers needed Shiv@Openflash Software Tuning 13 01-05-2014 12:42 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.