|
Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
06-19-2017, 05:28 AM | #29 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Drives: Toyota 86 2017 TRD Modded
Location: Oahu - Hawaii - USA
Posts: 75
Thanks: 214
Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I plan on getting that (due to me not being in 6k-7k range a lot) along with the ACE stainless steel FP then applying the DT. If you have dyno results for 91/92/93 octane for aforementioned kit, let me know Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
__________________
Life is like a car, you press the gas to go, steer around all the things blocking your way through Life, and park it when you reach your destination
|
|
06-19-2017, 02:36 PM | #30 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I make over 200whp on the DT dyno with just the A/350 header alone, no boost |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | ThatAsianBradah (06-23-2017) |
06-20-2017, 09:32 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 655
Thanks: 326
Thanked 258 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Good info as always. Does the CS400 not retain any low end advantage? I'm looking at the JRSC with hbp and 7k redline after the newness wears off on my BRZ. I DD mine and would prefer the low end benefits if they still exist though.
|
06-20-2017, 12:14 PM | #32 |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
You want the Edelbrock SC if you want low end power, not the Jackson Racing SC. The SC will amplify the header gains, and vice versa, with a good tune. If low end is what you want, get the Edelbrock + CS400.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | ThatAsianBradah (06-23-2017) |
06-20-2017, 03:41 PM | #33 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2014 Lightning Red Subaru BRZ
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 32
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Moue For This Useful Post: | Calum (07-16-2017) |
06-20-2017, 04:47 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 655
Thanks: 326
Thanked 258 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The car is ok imo in the sub-3500 rpm range as it is stock, I would just prefer to augment that range if it was a simple trade off in the header selection. Not looking for big low-rpm boost.
|
06-20-2017, 08:05 PM | #35 |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
|
06-20-2017, 08:05 PM | #36 |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
|
06-21-2017, 06:49 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 655
Thanks: 326
Thanked 258 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
06-21-2017, 10:41 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: 2015 Scion frz
Location: Toronto
Posts: 297
Thanks: 67
Thanked 146 Times in 87 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
06-22-2017, 10:32 AM | #41 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2014 Lightning Red Subaru BRZ
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 32
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
06-22-2017, 07:24 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Toyota GTS 86
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 243
Thanks: 21
Thanked 118 Times in 65 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Sorry to re-post from another thread but I hoping to get an answer and move forward and order some headers.
Being RHD I can go for the 250 or the 400. Other than 'the 250 is better at high revs and less so at lower revs' versus 'the 400 is better at lower revs and less so at high revs' I can't find any qualitative assessment of the two. Am I sacrificing 10% power at 4000rpm to get 2% better at 7000rpm on the 250? If that is the case I'd probably go with the 400. If anyone can help please shout out otherwise I'll have to flip a coin! The main plan is to optimise for track days and hopefully get a good bump for DD and flatten the torque curve. I think the 400 is better for linear torque but at what expense at the top end? |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ace Header 4-2-1 CS400 Custom BRZEdit Tune Dyno Results | JDM-dono | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 24 | 05-05-2016 04:54 PM |
Shiv dyno day 2 in lewisville, OFT users custom dyno tunes | malubawla | Southwest | 14 | 11-21-2015 01:53 PM |
Dyno numbers list from Evasive Motorsports Meet/Dyno | Fish | Southern California | 29 | 02-24-2013 03:16 AM |
Dyno Compilation - dyno testing results and recommendations | Illusive | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 82 | 02-08-2013 07:00 PM |
Base line dyno figure (dynapak Hub dyno) | gtauto | AUSTRALIA | 16 | 10-08-2012 08:06 AM |