follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-09-2020, 03:51 PM   #29
AngelGT86Racer
Member
 
AngelGT86Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Drives: 2013 FR-S, 2007 Acura TL 5AT
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 55
Thanks: 30
Thanked 43 Times in 27 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
What's your ride height relative to stock?
I was of the impression that my ride height remained largely unchanged. The other reviews I've read suggested that the stack height of RS plates is almost identical to stock and that you might actually *gain* a couple millimeters of ride height.



I'd need to compare my car to a PP car on stock top mounts to see the difference in ride height.
__________________
2013 FR-S Raven, AutoX/Track/Daily Driver
Build: Angel's Dual Duty FR-S Build
YouTube: Angel Christov
AngelGT86Racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 04:53 PM   #30
blueovalz
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2015 FRS
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Perhaps useless info here, but I foresaw this issue of a lowered car while I was reviewing various aftermarket camber plates (just after purchasing the FRS). Then I saw the Ground Control (or any other make that would mount on top of the shock tower, not below it) camber plates. I went ahead and installed the coilovers, and then inserted 1" aluminum spacers between the camber plate and the shock tower. The longer bolts holding this assembly together were welded to the OEM 3-bolt plate/bracket that affixes the OEM top-hat. This in effect increased the bump travel back to OEM. Ultimately, I did some follow-up work that lowered the damper deeper into the OEM shock tube, which increased the bump travel even more. Having put 40k miles on the setup, I've had no problems. My greatest fear was perhaps a risk of pull-through with the top-mounted camber plate, but it appears the OEM 3-bolt mounting bracket under the shock tower distributes the load sufficiently, even when hitting the bump-stops.

The one detractor to this is with the camber plates raised, the upper spring perch cone is now positioned level and within the roughly 4" opening of the shock tower, which reduces the amount of camber adjustment. Solution to that was the use of camber bolts to set what I wanted "mid-hole", which allowed me to use the camber plate for finer/smaller camber adjustments within the top-plate hole. Hitting the bump stops is a very infrequent affair now, and droop has never been an issue.

Last edited by blueovalz; 01-15-2020 at 05:04 PM.
blueovalz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 06:27 AM   #31
Contender
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: Washougal
Posts: 130
Thanks: 6
Thanked 51 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokay444 View Post
Penske will build you whatever you want.
Hmmm they are one of my customers will have to talk to them.
Contender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 09:26 AM   #32
Goingnowherefast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Drives: AP2 S2000, 91 Miata 1.8L Rotrex 5MT
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 465
Thanks: 275
Thanked 299 Times in 187 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
Bilstein B14, change the springs and possibly revalve as needed.

- Andrew
Forthing this recommendation. Among the advantages already talked about, the Bilstein line tends to have great corrosion protection. Additionally, due to popularity, getting them revalved can be done at a lot of places, unlike some more niche dampers.
__________________
2022 Hyundai Elantra N 6MT SCCA TT S3//Will be back in an 86 eventually

Last edited by Goingnowherefast; 01-16-2020 at 12:10 PM.
Goingnowherefast is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Goingnowherefast For This Useful Post:
wparsons (01-16-2020), ZDan (01-16-2020)
Old 01-16-2020, 12:00 PM   #33
Bach415
Senior Member
 
Bach415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: Whiteout FRS
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,245
Thanks: 903
Thanked 414 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I have b14's with the fronts re-valved and can tell you that they do feel great compared to my previous HKS SP's (too stiff for DD). Handling was great (not too much different from the HKS but this is comparing it on spirited runs). I did buy mines 2nd hand from an old member off the forums.

He has a link to the different combinations and setups he tried with the B14 listed here:
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=103830

When I got it from him, it had the 6k springs on it with the group N top hats and STI rear top hats on. Also gave me the 5k springs and the stock progressive springs with it. I swapped it out to the 5k springs and changed out the top hats for RS CasCams but eventually went back to the Group N + 2 camber bolts due to the NVH (eventually car became my DD again). Also had camber slippage issues with the CasCams (camber would slip to full negative on hard corners, probably either due to bottoming out/the spring rate).

Also there is a link that talks a lot about modifying the bilstein suspension:
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=82794
Bach415 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bach415 For This Useful Post:
ZDan (01-18-2020)
Old 01-20-2020, 02:18 PM   #34
Tokay444
Anti stance.
 
Tokay444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,629
Thanks: 897
Thanked 956 Times in 546 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Contender View Post
Hmmm they are one of my customers will have to talk to them.
They'll be the best 20 grand you've ever spent.
Tokay444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2020, 06:57 PM   #35
Petah78
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Drives: 2022 BRZ sport-tech
Location: Canada
Posts: 395
Thanks: 343
Thanked 185 Times in 116 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
B6 are roughly the same bump and droop travel as stock. B8 have less droop. They may have shorter bumpstops but that's it. Good shocks but don't buy them for more travel!

Certainly could try the B14s as is and go from there. I'm sure 5k/6k would be good on standard valving, 6k/7k maybe a little underdamped in front. I do have Bilstein branded 7k springs if you're interested. Edit: and KW branded 5k 200mm springs if you want to create a German Frankenstein's monster. Lol. Obviously there are tons of other choices, we were just doing some shop clean up today

The raceseng plates work much better for coilovers if I recall. With their upper perch the stack height is small and you don't lose bump travel, but you'd have to buy that from them.

I would not recommend 2 inch drop rear mounts.

I would expect the coilovers set up with proper travel to be a large improvement in driveability over your current set up.

- Andrew
Sorry to digress it I do have a couple of questions:

1. Can you use the stock top mounts with the B14?
2. What tophat/spring options would there be available for the B14 if you choose to upgrade to a higher rate later on?
3. How does the B6/RCE yellow combo compare to the B14 system?

Thanks.
__________________
Daijiro Katoh - Champion Forever!
Past: 92 EG w/JDM B18C, 00 EK w/JDM B18C, 04 600RR, 97 ITR #421, 10 Acura CSX-S, 17 BRZ
Current: 22 BRZ, 00 S2K - #0220
Petah78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2020, 10:25 AM   #36
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,403
Thanks: 3,416
Thanked 7,241 Times in 2,962 Posts
Mentioned: 303 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petah78 View Post
Sorry to digress it I do have a couple of questions:

1. Can you use the stock top mounts with the B14?
2. What tophat/spring options would there be available for the B14 if you choose to upgrade to a higher rate later on?
3. How does the B6/RCE yellow combo compare to the B14 system?

Thanks.
1. Yes. They're designed to use stock top hats.

2. If converting to linear springs, you'll need new upper spring perches. Most camber plates will work then (but you'll need to make sure).

3. B6/RCE Yellow vs B14...the B14 will allow you to go a little lower and still work. Slightly firmer spring rates on the standard B14 so likely a little better on the track. B6 combo is simple, easy, fun. Not as low or stiff, but they work well on the street and track with appropriate tires.

- Andrew
Racecomp Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2020, 11:38 AM   #37
Petah78
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Drives: 2022 BRZ sport-tech
Location: Canada
Posts: 395
Thanks: 343
Thanked 185 Times in 116 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
1. Yes. They're designed to use stock top hats.

2. If converting to linear springs, you'll need new upper spring perches. Most camber plates will work then (but you'll need to make sure).

3. B6/RCE Yellow vs B14...the B14 will allow you to go a little lower and still work. Slightly firmer spring rates on the standard B14 so likely a little better on the track. B6 combo is simple, easy, fun. Not as low or stiff, but they work well on the street and track with appropriate tires.

- Andrew

Thanks for the reply.


1. Is there a way to retain the factory top mount while moving to a linear/coilover spring?
2. The B14s at max ride height, would it be the same as factory ride height? I need the extra clearance for winter use.


Since the car sees winter use, i opt for more robust/OEM parts if possible. ie. OEM top mounts, camber bolts rather than camber plates as i have seen camber plate bearings being eaten alive by road salt. The B14 is very interesting, seems like a simple setup for what i need now and I can upgrade in the future via revalve/linear springs. I am sure the linear spring will offer a decently compliant street ride. It even offers a lifetime warranty!
__________________
Daijiro Katoh - Champion Forever!
Past: 92 EG w/JDM B18C, 00 EK w/JDM B18C, 04 600RR, 97 ITR #421, 10 Acura CSX-S, 17 BRZ
Current: 22 BRZ, 00 S2K - #0220
Petah78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2020, 12:07 PM   #38
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,403
Thanks: 3,416
Thanked 7,241 Times in 2,962 Posts
Mentioned: 303 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petah78 View Post
Thanks for the reply.


1. Is there a way to retain the factory top mount while moving to a linear/coilover spring?
2. The B14s at max ride height, would it be the same as factory ride height? I need the extra clearance for winter use.


Since the car sees winter use, i opt for more robust/OEM parts if possible. ie. OEM top mounts, camber bolts rather than camber plates as i have seen camber plate bearings being eaten alive by road salt. The B14 is very interesting, seems like a simple setup for what i need now and I can upgrade in the future via revalve/linear springs. I am sure the linear spring will offer a decently compliant street ride. It even offers a lifetime warranty!
1. yes. you'll still need different upper spring perches.
2. probably not. minimum drop of around 15mm is my guess.

Our RCE SS1 coilovers could be an option for you...I ran them through our crap salt winter even with camber plates and they hold up great. The bearing in the camber plates is sealed on the bottom. Linear springs, adjustable damping, comfortable ride. The Bilsteins are a good option for those that either are okay with the progressive springs or want a more serious revalved and resprung custom Bilstein set up.

- Andrew
Racecomp Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2020, 04:47 PM   #39
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Since we're talking about B14. What are the measurements of the rear shock fully extended and compressed?

Seems like the progressive and soft springs will have a lot of sag and if lowering the car more, it will only eat up your bump travel.
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2020, 02:01 AM   #40
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
@ZDan Have you checked these ones?

https://www.sti.jp/en/parts/subarubr.../ST20310AS040/

They are co-developed by Bilstein Germany and STI Japan. Funny thing is that I was living in Germany and I had to order them from Japan, because Bilstein Germany does not provide them in the local market.

About specs:
They have a longer front strut which gives more bump travel. They might look similar to Bilstein's B6 suspension, but the internals and valving are different.

Springs are not that stiff, but among serious damper manufacturers there is a concerted move back to softer spring rates. STI is not providing the exact rates. Comparing to my previous Sachs adjustable coilovers (Front 38.50N/mm, Rear 42.50N/mm) they feel softer and more compliant.

Only "issue" of the suspension is the height of the car which is about 0.6" lower than stock height. So, I would say a bit close to stock height. If you are looking for a lower height, then you might not like them.
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2020, 02:27 AM   #41
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Well, i wouldn't like them because "issue" to me is other way around, i don't want to lower any below stock. Hence thinking of "normal" B6.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to churchx For This Useful Post:
nikitopo (04-03-2020)
Old 04-03-2020, 08:24 AM   #42
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thanks for heads-up on these But looks like they're probably softer than what I'm aiming for. Would like something in the neighborhood of 6-8 kg/mm front, 7-9 rear, ~2x as stiff. I'd also like a ~25mm-30mm drop.

I gotta start thinking about this again, currently I'm ~30mm lowered with no front camber on the factory wheels with winter tires. When I swap to +35 offset wheels with 245 tires I'ma need front camber, and no way I'm running the camber plates with the factory struts at -30mm again!

B14s still look like the way to go, but would hafta invest in linear-rate springs and upper spring perches, and ideally have them revalved. So $$$ starts to look less attractive...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
@ZDan Have you checked these ones?

https://www.sti.jp/en/parts/subarubr.../ST20310AS040/

They are co-developed by Bilstein Germany and STI Japan. Funny thing is that I was living in Germany and I had to order them from Japan, because Bilstein Germany does not provide them in the local market.

About specs:
They have a longer front strut which gives more bump travel. They might look similar to Bilstein's B6 suspension, but the internals and valving are different.

Springs are not that stiff, but among serious damper manufacturers there is a concerted move back to softer spring rates. STI is not providing the exact rates. Comparing to my previous Sachs adjustable coilovers (Front 38.50N/mm, Rear 42.50N/mm) they feel softer and more compliant.

Only "issue" of the suspension is the height of the car which is about 0.6" lower than stock height. So, I would say a bit close to stock height. If you are looking for a lower height, then you might not like them.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
nikitopo (04-03-2020)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ohlins Road and track coilovers Lithium Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 7 07-29-2017 04:20 PM
FS: Ohlins Road & Track Coilovers Wuuu Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 10 03-16-2015 09:37 PM
Ohlins Road & Track Coilovers for sale h4nh Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 17 02-18-2014 11:35 PM
Ohlins Road & Track Coilovers - IN STOCK!!! RallySport Direct Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 7 05-28-2013 04:11 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.