04-11-2012, 05:14 PM | #85 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: '03 WRX Wagon, '89 Camry Alltrac
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Seems fine to me... 2.5k-3.5k for normal driving (that rev range will get you on to the freeway just fine) and 4.5k-7k for spirited driving.
And I'll second (third? fourth?) the comment that most/all other Subaru motors have that odd dip just under 4k rpm. -Charlie |
04-11-2012, 07:15 PM | #86 |
You know you want it.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S
Location: RVA
Posts: 705
Thanks: 160
Thanked 327 Times in 154 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
04-11-2012, 07:55 PM | #87 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2013 DZE/01 (sold for MX5 ND1)
Location: western MA
Posts: 871
Thanks: 265
Thanked 269 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
FYI for you guys talking about the K20, according to wikipedia the Si had a K20Z3 and the RSX-S a K20Z1.
RSX-S (a bit hard to read, but the blue line is stock): 2007 Civic Si (link instead of embedded image because of its dimensions): http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/attac...dyno_chart.jpg Last edited by Deslock; 04-11-2012 at 08:30 PM. |
04-11-2012, 08:12 PM | #88 | |
Kuruma Otaku
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
How does pressure differential affect flow, Serial? Something like ~ Squareroot(pressure1/pressure2) is I think for rough calculations of flow increase to pressure increase in fuel injectors? Now consider that the exhaust acoustic pulse can exceed 6 psi (that I think is the measured figure from the ~1960s era book I have) and there are multiple pulses from different cylinders, and they can travel into the intake tract. So it's feasible with the timing we could end up with the cylinder at ~ 6psi below atmospheric and the intake tract at ~6psi above. 12 psi pressure difference can limit the amount of intake reversion on a late closing intake. Or we can use it to fight airspeed frictional losses at higher rpm for better high rpm filling. Where in the rpm range it occurs is a mix of distances traveled by the waves (intake runner and header runner/exhaust lengths) and the time available for the pulse to reach the cylinder through open valves(cams/overlap). Then there is of course sometimes corresponding opposite pressures. In the AVCS situation it's possible that some of the timing changes can be used to 'catch' or 'skip' the good and bad pressure waves which could have a stronger effect than just inertia of the intake charge. ^ Shit, that's kind of rambly.... (Patiently waiting for Serialk1llr to learn about acoustics so contributions that will lead to epic headers, exhausts intake manifolds and AVCS timing strategies can be made...)
__________________
Because titanium. |
|
04-11-2012, 08:50 PM | #89 | |
You know you want it.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S
Location: RVA
Posts: 705
Thanks: 160
Thanked 327 Times in 154 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
04-11-2012, 10:22 PM | #90 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Pressure is "specific force" in a sense, so the difference in pressure dictates a difference in force acting on the fluid.
Knowing that you want to see the positive pressure part of the wave to arrive when the intake valve closes, the intake runner length has to be like 3.5 meters long or something to catch the wave the first time it comes back, but the runner lengths you see on cars are more like 1/20th of that, so I need to go think about this more sometime. I'm guessing that a cylinder can utilize the wave generated by another cylinder or something like that, which makes things quite complicated. At any rate, the intake "frequency" appears to be best matched to the mid 2000s range. |
04-11-2012, 10:47 PM | #91 |
Kuruma Otaku
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
^ Like I mentioned before, one cylinder is not that bad to figure out on a spreadsheet. 4 cylinders all interacting though...
__________________
Because titanium. |
04-11-2012, 10:58 PM | #92 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Scion Tc
Location: Florida
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
premium required. Don't even talk about 91.
|
04-12-2012, 12:31 AM | #93 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Put Put
Location: CA
Posts: 607
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Well... all in all.... is that a good or bad dyno graph? lol
Comparing these numbers to the ones on Scion/Subaru's website doesn't seem to have a huge drop? Just can't for the life of me figure out how to work the graph lol |
04-12-2012, 12:44 AM | #94 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2011 Outlander XLS, 2013 FR-S Blue
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 634
Thanks: 129
Thanked 168 Times in 102 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Non-motorhead here, but I remember reading that the engine changes to Direct Injection at higher revs. Is that dip the switchover?
|
04-12-2012, 01:32 AM | #95 | |
Kuruma Otaku
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The manifold/cam tuning is likely the case. They could likely tune it out but they would probably lose too much low-end to the point that people complain about daily driving it.
__________________
Because titanium. |
|
04-12-2012, 02:09 AM | #96 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 404
Thanks: 166
Thanked 307 Times in 101 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Did they perform the dyno-run in 4th gear? Coz in the MT 86 5th is 1:1, don't think redline in 5th is ~100mph!
|
04-12-2012, 07:22 AM | #97 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2013 DZE/01 (sold for MX5 ND1)
Location: western MA
Posts: 871
Thanks: 265
Thanked 269 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
K20 and FA20 dyno plot http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?p=181301
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Deslock For This Useful Post: | mrtodd (04-15-2012) |
04-12-2012, 08:24 AM | #98 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 2015 Halo FR-S
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 67
Thanks: 36
Thanked 22 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
That graph shows output higher than the K20 across the board including in the dip, all the way up to about 7100rpm. Based on my experience with the K20 in my '06 Civic, the FA20 in the FRBRZ-S86 is going to be more riot than I have balls to loot in. Then again, that is from different dynos, different conditions.
Last edited by Chenslee; 04-12-2012 at 08:34 AM. Reason: caveat |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cobb Tuning dyno pull | Tainen | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics | 87 | 08-01-2012 06:54 PM |
insideline brz sti rendering | DIG1992 | BRZ Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum | 16 | 04-02-2012 05:05 PM |
Any publication strap this car on a dyno yet? | mspeed6 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 69 | 02-02-2012 04:48 PM |
2013 Scion FR-S: 10 Things You Don't Know (Maybe) - Insideline | rmagic | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 56 | 12-15-2011 05:36 PM |