05-12-2014, 11:47 PM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S, 2016 Miata Club
Location: NC
Posts: 785
Thanks: 183
Thanked 258 Times in 171 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I notice this a lot too. A certain times of the day the car feels very strong, and at other times it seems lacking. I was thinking it was the dense air, but it seems to also happen at times when the air is a little hotter than 20c or 68F. It doesn't pull harder at 10c than 20c. So I was thinking it might have been running on a different table.
|
05-13-2014, 12:02 AM | #58 | |
Seņor Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,104
Thanked 765 Times in 479 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT |
|
05-13-2014, 12:09 AM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S, 2016 Miata Club
Location: NC
Posts: 785
Thanks: 183
Thanked 258 Times in 171 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'm glad you mentioned it because I do notice that is a sweet spot (temp) for me. I think it was low 70's to high 60's Fahrenheit that the car felt great. I've been trying to keep an eye on the outside temp when the car was running good and it aways seems to be around this range. Wonder if we can "intercool" our NA cars hehe. I think I'll try and pay even more attention to it now. Maybe log it if I can remember to.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JimmyMac For This Useful Post: | Turdinator (05-13-2014) |
05-13-2014, 02:22 AM | #60 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
What sort of temperature ranges are you seeing? What you could do is widen the x axis rather than change the values in the table.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
05-13-2014, 05:16 AM | #61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I could try that. My recorded IATs have ranged from 60-105 under normal driving conditions, so I've been trying to get the MAF scale dial in for 80 degrees. With the .4% decrease in the temp compensation while driving with 90-100 degrees IAT's the fuel trim has gone more negative for the most part compared previous logs at about the same temperature.
|
05-13-2014, 05:20 AM | #62 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
05-13-2014, 09:11 AM | #63 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 13 White MT FR-S
Location: Gastonia, NC
Posts: 1,842
Thanks: 977
Thanked 1,135 Times in 523 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I just feel like I'm doing something wrong here.
__________________
|
05-13-2014, 09:45 AM | #64 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: frs
Location: nj
Posts: 723
Thanks: 237
Thanked 347 Times in 232 Posts
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
05-13-2014, 09:49 AM | #65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 13 White MT FR-S
Location: Gastonia, NC
Posts: 1,842
Thanks: 977
Thanked 1,135 Times in 523 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
When doing the OL on your tool, does it have to be in a sequence? I had a lot of small log files and combined them into one, and then filtered out all the CL from the csv. I think this might be the issue, that or I'm doing my AFR error wrong.
__________________
|
05-13-2014, 09:56 AM | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: '13 BRZ Ltd
Location: PA
Posts: 458
Thanks: 265
Thanked 229 Times in 117 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Are there really only 4 LTFT ranges for this car? I know on my STI there were LTFT A, B, C, D, each with a progressively higher g/s range (I *think* D was >40 g/s), and then D would be what was applied during open loop WOT, so although the fuel trims weren't linear with mass flow rate it still attempted to account for that.
Disclaimer here - I'm only monitoring fuel trims from the Torque app, which is reported as "LTFT1", so not sure if that has anything to do with it. I feel like I see a lot more than 4 ranges of fuel trims. It almost seems that there's a crossover around 3k rpm... if I'm cruising at under 3k rpm at a given highway load, and then speed up to over 3k rpm, the fuel trim changes although the flow range is constant. It goes from postive something to negative something. Maybe port/DI transitions? |
05-13-2014, 10:29 AM | #67 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: frs
Location: nj
Posts: 723
Thanks: 237
Thanked 347 Times in 232 Posts
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I suggest you do not mess with your log files at all. Just click on 'Load Log' when it promts you if you would 'like to reset column name or filters' click yes and makes sure all is set correctly: select your columns, set filters to filter out non-OL data, click ok. When you select Throttle Open Angle depending on what tuning solution you use you can use Trottle Position or Accelerator Pedal Angle. It's preset at 85% but I STRINGLY suggest you should take a look at the log curve and determine when transition happens from OpenLoop to CloseLoop and vice-versa for the parameter you decided to use. Eg. After you click OK the columns for different WOT runs populated. If you see too few data rows - that means at a brief point you had full throttle but you probably didn't do WOT run to redline. I would suggest to copy last column wot run data over the column with few data rows. If you still have WOT run columns empty and have more logs - just repeat the process except this time you can skip setting column names (unless you changed column names ) and filters. so, click on 'Load Log', click 'no' to the prompt to reset columns/filters. You should see more WOT columns populated. you can have up to 12 WOT runs loaded. if you have pasted current MAF scaling already then just click 'go' PS you can play with finetuning the filters or ask Kodename47 for best settings - he has spent a lot time on that. PPS @everyone Please, if you have gone through Usage tab and if something is not clear or is not covered - send me revised Usage text once you've learned whatever was not clear or not covered. you're getting helped, so pls help others. Last edited by vgi; 05-13-2014 at 10:40 AM. |
|
05-13-2014, 10:44 AM | #68 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 13 White MT FR-S
Location: Gastonia, NC
Posts: 1,842
Thanks: 977
Thanked 1,135 Times in 523 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
@vgi thanks, I was using a separate spreadsheet to find my AFR error. Doing it your way looks a lot better.
edit: @steve99 , might want to add the above comment to the OP.
__________________
|
05-13-2014, 10:50 AM | #69 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: frs
Location: nj
Posts: 723
Thanks: 237
Thanked 347 Times in 232 Posts
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to vgi For This Useful Post: | ML (05-13-2014) |
05-13-2014, 11:30 AM | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
@ML if you're trying to do logging to make changes ensure you stick to 1 main principle and you can use 1 log for both OL and CL: Only go WOT when logging a complete pull. You only really need 2/3 for the tool to work properly. For CL changes you only need partial throttle and I tend to try and vary pedal movement to change the throttle plate angle but rarely go above 3.5k. I find using different gears and slowly going up the range works quite well.
I think the setting you really need to look at is the AFR Error +/-%. If you don't change that, your tip in throttle will show massive positive trims and artificially raise your curve. If your NA I would have it set exactly as @vgi posted above. What I would do is load in your runs with the filter set to default (200) and then look at the individual runs and see what the maximum genuine error is throughout the curve. If you're NA it should be no more than 5-10%. If that's the case, clear the run data, reload the log but change the filter to just above the max genuine error and the resultant curve will fall back into place.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post: | ML (05-13-2014) |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AFR in Closed Loop | Toyota John | Software Tuning | 39 | 07-07-2019 08:26 AM |
BRZedit Fuel Trims, Closed to Open loop transiton | mad_sb | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 32 | 08-06-2015 03:14 AM |
Notes on injector / maf scalining using full time open loop | mad_sb | Software Tuning | 40 | 03-03-2014 05:49 PM |
Screencast: closed loop boost control with RaceRom | jamesm | Software Tuning | 2 | 02-10-2014 02:23 PM |
Screencast: experimenting with full-time closed loop fueling | jamesm | Software Tuning | 2 | 12-27-2013 10:19 AM |