follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-20-2013, 03:29 AM   #29
Turkish
Serial Cone Killer
 
Turkish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: '14 BRZ - WRB Premium 6MT
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,326
Thanks: 1,081
Thanked 656 Times in 441 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by humfrz View Post
Thus, the resonator helps to make the engine paradoxically quieter and more powerful."
So, by deleting the resonator from the OEM airbox, I would be reducing the power from the FA20?
Turkish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013, 10:24 AM   #30
Enthalpy
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: FR-S 10 Series/'93 RX-7
Location: Houston
Posts: 15
Thanks: 4
Thanked 19 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Symmetrical View Post
Yeah after seeing a bunch of his posts, all he wants to do is look superior to everyone. Everybody could appreciate a knowledgeable person, sure, but to always come off as a Mr. Know-it-All is really getting old.
I don't get that vibe myself in this specific thread, because he made valid points.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turkish View Post
So, by deleting the resonator from the OEM airbox, I would be reducing the power from the FA20?
Highly doubt it.
Enthalpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013, 10:32 AM   #31
TRD-X
Senior Member
 
TRD-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Da-Big Banana
Location: Myrtle Beach SC
Posts: 1,199
Thanks: 1,311
Thanked 955 Times in 534 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Symmetrical View Post
Yeah after seeing a bunch of his posts, all he wants to do is look superior to everyone. Everybody could appreciate a knowledgeable person, sure, but to always come off as a Mr. Know-it-All is really getting old.

Well I'm just here to learn something I might not know about the FR-S and check out all the cool mods......
__________________
Supratwins/TRD-X aka Jim Gone to a higher plane of existence!
TRD-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013, 11:11 AM   #32
Turkish
Serial Cone Killer
 
Turkish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: '14 BRZ - WRB Premium 6MT
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,326
Thanks: 1,081
Thanked 656 Times in 441 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
[QUOTE=Enthalpy;1Highly doubt it.[/QUOTE]

That's what my thoughts were, I just wanted to confirm.


Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4
__________________
For those who hear him call...

... his name is...

C'THULHU
Turkish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013, 11:54 AM   #33
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Symmetrical View Post
Yeah after seeing a bunch of his posts, all he wants to do is look superior to everyone. Everybody could appreciate a knowledgeable person, sure, but to always come off as a Mr. Know-it-All is really getting old.
I don't claim to know it all, I just take the view that there's not a simple explanation for some things.

In the context of this thread, yes the intake resonator for a BMW 3-Series may be different from a 5-Series, but what is the target audience for the car? More importantly, resonators are not about reducing sound... much like aerodynamic lift on a car, the reverse of it is often labeled as "downforce" when it should be named negative lift.

Resonators are used to achieve a desired intake noise. Whether that's lower/higher is a part of that, but to say resonators are used to lower intake sound as a blanket statement is adding to the common misconception.

But if you want to join the personal attack bandwagon like everyone else, go for it. I judge you by your individual posts, I don't make wholesale judgments on your character by what you collectively post online.

To each their own.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013, 12:08 PM   #34
Luis_GT
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2002 BMW 530i, 10 Series FR-S
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,404
Thanks: 3,416
Thanked 3,334 Times in 1,754 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
I don't claim to know it all, I just take the view that there's not a simple explanation for some things.

In the context of this thread, yes the intake resonator for a BMW 3-Series may be different from a 5-Series, but what is the target audience for the car? More importantly, resonators are not about reducing sound... much like aerodynamic lift on a car, the reverse of it is often labeled as "downforce" when it should be named negative lift.

Resonators are used to achieve a desired intake noise. Whether that's lower/higher is a part of that, but to say resonators are used to lower intake sound as a blanket statement is adding to the common misconception.

But if you want to join the personal attack bandwagon like everyone else, go for it. I judge you by your individual posts, I don't make wholesale judgments on your character by what you collectively post online.

To each their own.

-alex

The problem is that you keep saying there is something more to the resonator, but have not been able to prove it even after I showed you 2 cars using the same exact engine, producing the same HP and TQ numbers.

All you are throwing is simple unsupportable speculation as to how a resonator is used by a company.
Luis_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013, 12:27 PM   #35
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis_GT View Post
The problem is that you keep saying there is something more to the resonator, but have not been able to prove it even after I showed you 2 cars using the same exact engine, producing the same HP and TQ numbers.

All you are throwing is simple unsupportable speculation as to how a resonator is used by a company.
I'm not going to go back and quote myself on this. You can read what I wrote.

I am speculating. And in case you missed it, you're speculating as much as I am.

Two identical engines and identical peak horsepower/torque numbers does not mean the engines have the exact same tune... it may be very close but there may be minor differences.

BMW isn't stupid... the same engine used in a heavier car (5-series) would have a different projected consumption and warranty requirements over the expected lifespan of the model. The easiest way to make changes to this is to fine tune the engine powerband...

That's all I am saying. If you continue to read it as me throwing out unsubstantiated speculations, so be it.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013, 12:57 PM   #36
Luis_GT
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2002 BMW 530i, 10 Series FR-S
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,404
Thanks: 3,416
Thanked 3,334 Times in 1,754 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
I'm not going to go back and quote myself on this. You can read what I wrote.

I am speculating. And in case you missed it, you're speculating as much as I am.

Two identical engines and identical peak horsepower/torque numbers does not mean the engines have the exact same tune... it may be very close but there may be minor differences.

BMW isn't stupid... the same engine used in a heavier car (5-series) would have a different projected consumption and warranty requirements over the expected lifespan of the model. The easiest way to make changes to this is to fine tune the engine powerband...

That's all I am saying. If you continue to read it as me throwing out unsubstantiated speculations, so be it.

-alex
The engine was also used on the X5, which is a LOT heavier than a 5 series, and it doesn't have a resonator... So that nulls and voids your heavier thus requiring a resonator argument.
Luis_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013, 01:26 PM   #37
tennisfreak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2018 BMW M240i
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,768
Thanks: 692
Thanked 917 Times in 538 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
Just because it's TRD doesn't mean it's Toyota's aftermarket gift to this car.
-alex
Huh?
TRD is Toyota's in house developed performance/aftermarket parts.
If this is not what Toyota meant for their version of a performance intake what is?
tennisfreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013, 02:25 PM   #38
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luis_GT View Post
The engine was also used on the X5, which is a LOT heavier than a 5 series, and it doesn't have a resonator... So that nulls and voids your heavier thus requiring a resonator argument.
I never said a heavier chassis requires a resonator. I'm merely stating that there may be design goals we're not aware of beyond just sound. Please understand that this is my only point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tennisfreak View Post
Huh?
TRD is Toyota's in house developed performance/aftermarket parts.
If this is not what Toyota meant for their version of a performance intake what is?
I feel this is distracting from the thread but I'll just answer:

TRD's aftermarket parts are what Toyota feels they can sell to car owners while retaining a warranty. Depending on the territory they can also be street legal if required (CARB E.O. comes to mind, for example).

However, given that they are restricted by what they can/cannot do to the ECU (they can't simply reflash the ECU, for example, because it may make the car be in non-compliance of emissions laws), there's always some type of constraint that prevents the part from being the best that it can be.

Often times aftermarkets are better performance at a cheaper price than the OEM "racing" version of the same part, because a lot less money was spent on R&D for regulation compliance and more R&D was spent on outright performance.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013, 02:36 PM   #39
TRD-X
Senior Member
 
TRD-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Da-Big Banana
Location: Myrtle Beach SC
Posts: 1,199
Thanks: 1,311
Thanked 955 Times in 534 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
I never said a heavier chassis requires a resonator. I'm merely stating that there may be design goals we're not aware of beyond just sound. Please understand that this is my only point.



I feel this is distracting from the thread but I'll just answer:

TRD's aftermarket parts are what Toyota feels they can sell to car owners while retaining a warranty. Depending on the territory they can also be street legal if required (CARB E.O. comes to mind, for example).

However, given that they are restricted by what they can/cannot do to the ECU (they can't simply reflash the ECU, for example, because it may make the car be in non-compliance of emissions laws), there's always some type of constraint that prevents the part from being the best that it can be.

Often times aftermarkets are better performance at a cheaper price than the OEM "racing" version of the same part, because a lot less money was spent on R&D for regulation compliance and more R&D was spent on outright performance.

-alex
Dude I'm tired of your lack of knowledge learn before you speak there's guys here that's been modding cars for years and your trying to school them.

All TRD parts are 50-state Emissions Legal.

Toyota dealers reflash the ECU's everyday.
__________________
Supratwins/TRD-X aka Jim Gone to a higher plane of existence!
TRD-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013, 04:05 PM   #40
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRD-X View Post
Dude I'm tired of your lack of knowledge learn before you speak there's guys here that's been modding cars for years and your trying to school them.

All TRD parts are 50-state Emissions Legal.

Toyota dealers reflash the ECU's everyday.
I'm not trying to school anyone. Please go back and read what I wrote... "depending on the territory" implies that it can be street legal in places like California (and for the most part the rest of the country), but not meet other regulations in, say, the UK or Germany.

1) Intakes are mostly street legal, but not all TRD parts are street legal. Some intakes in other countries may not meet local requirements. If it's street legal it just means the manufacturer has taken the necessary steps to meet emissions requirements.

http://www.toyotaracing.com/trd/cata...g_lowres_R.pdf (last page)

2) Toyota dealers do reflash ECUs every day, but that's not my point. Is there a specific ECU reflash that is supposed to be done with an intake install? If not, the R&D was put into the intake itself to work with the OEM ECU flash, hence the higher cost of the TRD intake versus a comparable aftermarket design.

A Toyota dealer reflashing a Toyota manufacturer approved ECU flash, versus Toyota offering a ECU reflash that is not in emissions compliance are two completely different matters. The former almost always have to be approved by the EPA prior to being sent to dealers, the latter requires extensive testing to make sure it doesn't change some other parameter of the car excessively.



As a closing note, I'm not going to edit anything I've written in this thread. People can read it and figure out if I'm blowing hot air out of my ass or not. And I'm definitely not schooling anyone with wrong/misleading info, contrary to what has been claimed.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
mav's sandy lady parts, resonator


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Piano Black Dash Panel and Black Traction Control Button? stoneman155 Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 13 10-02-2015 11:09 PM
XXR527 Chromium black 18x8.75 Hankook Ventus 225-40 Black BRZ random hero Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 66 02-14-2013 12:20 AM
ADVAN RSII 18x8.5 & 18x9.5 (Hyper black / Semi-Gloss Black) - in stock! Touge Factory Wheels and Tires 13 01-15-2013 07:43 PM
Oakley Halfjacket 2.0 Polished Black with Black Iridium lenses. Zadkiel Miscellaneous 8 12-02-2012 01:51 PM
SoCal: 2004 S2000, Black on black, 70k miles, 16.3k OBO Mike Cars for Sale/Trade 0 08-01-2012 07:54 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.