01-30-2021, 01:03 PM | #197 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
You should still do road testing as the final part of any mapping session.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post: | solidONE (02-01-2021) |
01-30-2021, 10:13 PM | #198 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 359
Thanks: 230
Thanked 210 Times in 107 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Even if the dyno has realtime AFR readings and I could tune based on them, that wouldn't necessarily be the AFRs that I would end up with after the ECU learns up the fuel trims, would it? AFRs would affect how much ignition I can run, it may look good on dyno day but it won't necessarily be a few days after the ECU settles in? .. |
|
01-31-2021, 04:40 AM | #199 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
01-31-2021, 06:38 AM | #200 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 359
Thanks: 230
Thanked 210 Times in 107 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
As a background I'm on Wayno's tune, only with a decatted OEM header and I'm trying to understand why the actual AFRs are not doing anything to 'catch up' to the commanded. Now @Wayno himself has stated that the actuals does not need to follow commanded, but to see it run off 0.4 points is unsettling. The car has also done at least 1000kms since the flash, and I'm seeing a constant LTFT of 2.93 throughout 5500 to redline, so I'm assuming the trims are fine. |
|
01-31-2021, 05:49 PM | #201 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
1. It's richer so will be safer and won't cost you any real power. 2. Do you trust the AFR output? Have you verified it? 3. Wayno is correct that the 2 do not need to align. Helpful for mapping but otherwise not actually necessary. It might be that the AFR you have is what is wanted and that the fuel map is setup to achieve that. Not saying that it is, but I know that is a method of tuning. 5. The LTFT is set in buckets, as such, based on load and RPM. This is definable in maps. LTFT is set by the STFT so all the time the STFT is 0, as is the case in open loop, then the LTFT will not adjust. I can't remember where the upper threshold starts but IIRC it's in the mid to low 4k RPM range. At the end of the day, fuel error and fuel trims are essentially the same. If the STFT and LTFT combined at any given point are +10% then your fuel error is that. If trims aren't active or not set, then you can calculate the error simply by using the input and output AFR. All my log systems use a calculation based on combined fuel trims and pure error, so I can make corrections within seconds of getting data and immediately after flashing.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
02-01-2021, 02:29 AM | #202 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 359
Thanks: 230
Thanked 210 Times in 107 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
It's like setting up everything with a non-linear offset instead of placing actual values, which makes me wonder how on the road tuning would be possible... I have another question - what is the purpose of the load limiter tables from a tuning standpoint for NA? What I can think of, it's only used to prevent the engine from getting into a low RPM high load state, and subsequently preventing LSPI. Apologies for the out of order questions, there's lots I'm picking up but there's a few pieces that I find it difficult to fit into the bigger picture. |
|
02-01-2021, 05:05 AM | #203 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
LSPI is not an issue for NA, the load limiters are there to aid ignition timing and fuel delivery limits and that's about it. The ECU will read over the specified limits but cap the maps at those limits. Let's be clear, AFR tuning is not going to be accurate. You have 1 AFR sensor taking an average of 4 cylinders. Unless you put a Wideband in each runner, you're tuning will only be as good as a fair guess as you have no idea what the actual AFR is anyway. So long as it's not knocking and too rich or too lean to make power, then it doesn't matter. Those are your goals under WOT; Make power, while not knocking.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
02-17-2021, 11:48 PM | #204 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: Orange GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 65
Thanks: 19
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Great link and thx for the info Kodename47
|
07-20-2021, 02:19 PM | #205 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 359
Thanks: 230
Thanked 210 Times in 107 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
@Kodename47 @Wayno @steve99 @tomm.brz
I understand that with pump gas the engine is knock limited, but does this knock limit apply to the higher RPM ranges only, or otherwise? As a background - I am slowly increasing ignition only at WOT loads to a point I start to see significant FLKC at > 5k RPM. But anything below 5k RPM there evidently isn't any knock at all. With your experiences - are we knock limited at WOT loads in lower RPMs (<5k)? I am only optimizing WOT as I am aware it is possible to advance past MBT in partial throttle loads. |
07-21-2021, 06:04 PM | #206 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
07-21-2021, 10:11 PM | #207 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: Orange GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 65
Thanks: 19
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Hi guys,
Trying to learn more about the ecu program and was wondering why in closed loop at cruise eng loads , .5, I am seeing a commanded AFR of 14.2 - 14.4 on a flat road with no throttle change. Actual AFR tracks it pretty close. I under stand how the CL compensation fuel additive tables addition of - numbers works but that would then give me around 14.48 - 14.57 commanded or higher at the same rpm and eng load. Is there another table some where that I cant find. Was thinking of reflashing factory tune to see if its the same as Waynes roms or OFT for that matter. Not wanting to change anything just wanting to understand whats going on. Cheers |
07-21-2021, 10:32 PM | #208 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 359
Thanks: 230
Thanked 210 Times in 107 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
https://datazap.me/u/compelica/knock...?log=0&data=20 |
|
07-22-2021, 06:55 PM | #209 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
no likely you will advance past mbt on petrol unless its very high grade but you would rearly need a dyno to prove that. Not possible on our local petrol here but its pretty crap |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post: | Compelica (07-22-2021) |
07-22-2021, 06:59 PM | #210 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The values in fuel tables is the values your asking for, the afr value is the measured value from the afr sensor its never going to be exact especially atfluctuating rpm and loads. at light loads light throttle the ecu will use long and sgort term fuel trims to try to match those up If iam is lass than 1 the fueling compensation table comes into play and may slightly richen fueling depending on value s in that table |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post: | 73TORANA! (07-22-2021) |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Maximum weight in the trunk? | djmm | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 20 | 08-13-2015 11:40 AM |
“Maximum Attack” Scion FR-S | stugray | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 13 | 02-01-2015 08:45 PM |
PA: Rays Gram Light 57 Maximum 5x100, 17x8, +43 (Price Reduced!) | Needs more cowbell | Wheels and Tires | 20 | 02-22-2013 10:03 AM |
MAXIMUM you would pay for a TRD Supercharger installed? | FRiSson | Forced Induction | 24 | 11-04-2012 01:08 AM |
MR-S Effect... | Dimman | CANADA | 11 | 09-06-2011 11:49 AM |