follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-25-2015, 02:00 PM   #155
thambu19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 78 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoolBRZ View Post
Because it can't be that warm where you live. I've visited Michigan, in the summer. Of course PFI/DI will be perfected by the time you get back. Then you'll show me where I went wrong and I'll have to start all over again. You should see my AVCS tables. Works of art but probably wrong in any number of places. I'll post them in the other AVCS threads. I have to swallow my pride if I want to learn how to tune better. I think it's safe to say that you are a master and I'm not.
Hey budd I will take a look. Always remember that cams and spark have to go together. Any cam change will need a change in spark timing. I am no expert by any means. I do engine development and calibration as a profession so I can see why certain calibrations are a certain way due to emissions or nvh etc.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
thambu19 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thambu19 For This Useful Post:
illmatic (11-25-2015), KoolBRZ (11-25-2015)
Old 11-25-2015, 02:33 PM   #156
KoolBRZ
Senior Member
 
KoolBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: Silver 2013 BRZ Ltd Auto 45,000 mi
Location: Vancouver, WA.USA
Posts: 965
Thanks: 86
Thanked 450 Times in 277 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Yes, but there is a big difference between wanting something somehow better, and not knowing how or why, and knowing why, visualizing what should be, and finding out how. BTW, I think we need another map for cold while using your map for warm/hot.
__________________
If I say yes, will that make you think I understand?
KoolBRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2015, 05:52 PM   #157
ztan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks: 44
Thanked 358 Times in 142 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoolBRZ View Post
I loaded a tune with your suggested revisions first, and didn't even load any of mine to compare. It was so much better! @!#*&% you! I made 4 other tunes to try out, and now they are all worthless! Blast you and your intelligent mind! Now I'm going to have to rethink these principles you based your revisions on so I can find how far the limits are so I can push it to the limit.
I concur with @KoolBRZ that the PI DI map posted by @thambu19 works extremely well and runs really smoothly.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...&postcount=112
ztan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ztan For This Useful Post:
solidONE (11-26-2015)
Old 11-26-2015, 06:34 PM   #158
thambu19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 78 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ztan View Post
I concur with @KoolBRZ that the PI DI map posted by @thambu19 works extremely well and runs really smoothly.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...&postcount=112
Hey I totally made those up in my head so you guys might want to make some tweaks here and there. Did you add some spark where we are running di now where it was pfi before. It is important to do that.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
thambu19 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thambu19 For This Useful Post:
solidONE (11-26-2015)
Old 11-26-2015, 10:00 PM   #159
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Fantastic! lol

Edit: Thanks Happy Turkey day!
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.

Last edited by solidONE; 11-26-2015 at 10:35 PM.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2015, 02:19 AM   #160
KoolBRZ
Senior Member
 
KoolBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: Silver 2013 BRZ Ltd Auto 45,000 mi
Location: Vancouver, WA.USA
Posts: 965
Thanks: 86
Thanked 450 Times in 277 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Hey, I've tried to tweak it a little

Quote:
Originally Posted by thambu19 View Post
Hey I totally made those up in my head so you guys might want to make some tweaks here and there. Did you add some spark where we are running di now where it was pfi before. It is important to do that.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
There wasn't a single change that didn't make it worse. Next I'll try adding some timing in the DI areas.
__________________
If I say yes, will that make you think I understand?
KoolBRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2015, 02:32 AM   #161
ztan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks: 44
Thanked 358 Times in 142 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thambu19 View Post
Hey I totally made those up in my head so you guys might want to make some tweaks here and there. Did you add some spark where we are running di now where it was pfi before. It is important to do that.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
Have been running some high intake AVCS values (45) but was getting knock at cruising speeds (2800-3000 rpm, at 0.9-1.5 g/rev) even full DI with IAM dropping.
I've just re-reduced the AVCS intake cam to 40 which has settled the knock signal and about to add in ignition.
I'm not sure if it was true knock or just intake AVCS noise too close to the cam advance limits, but the engine is behaving much better with a bit less cam, more PI lower down, full DI up top.
ztan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ztan For This Useful Post:
thambu19 (11-27-2015)
Old 11-27-2015, 05:55 AM   #162
thambu19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 78 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Too much intake advance means intake is opening when piston is travelling up in exhaust stroke. This can send exh gas up intake runner and re breathe increasing residuals and knock. So there is always a fine balance.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
thambu19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2015, 05:56 AM   #163
thambu19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 78 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
This is more so at lower speeds

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
thambu19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2015, 06:38 AM   #164
freerunner
Senior Member
 
freerunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Thanks: 135
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thambu19 View Post
When you get a chance can you try something like this? At WOT I have gone 100% DI. This means you need to a degree or so more spark there to use the full potential. If you do not then it will feel sluggish compared to stock calibration.
Flashed your PI/DI map yesterday. Added 3 degrees ignition advance at
load > 0.90 up until 3,8k rpm or so. And there's still headroom for more spark left.

Feels better than before. Seems worth to play around with these tables.
freerunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2015, 07:09 AM   #165
thambu19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 78 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerunner View Post
Flashed your PI/DI map yesterday. Added 3 degrees ignition advance at
load > 0.90 up until 3,8k rpm or so. And there's still headroom for more spark left.

Feels better than before. Seems worth to play around with these tables.
Be careful adding too much spark at engine speed making peak torque. Up to 3800rpm should be okay. Some engines I have worked on goes straight to pre-ignition. Don't want thatone

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
thambu19 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thambu19 For This Useful Post:
freerunner (11-27-2015)
Old 12-01-2015, 10:51 PM   #166
arghx7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: car
Location: cold
Posts: 599
Thanks: 72
Thanked 607 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'm not too active on this forum lately but I did get caught up with this thread, as these things tend to die and suddenly get revived.

The AVCS intake side has the negative values @thambu19 and others were talking about because it is a mid lockpin AVCS. That means the intake side can retard, not just advance. The retard is a fuel economy thing. It's the same type of AVCS that's on the FA20DIT. In fact, it's the BorgWarner phaser technology that Ford uses on the 5.0 Mustangs. On those FA20DIT engines when you delete the tumble generator valves you need to advance the AVCS or it runs like crap without all that tumble motion in the combustion chamber.



more details (mostly relevant to FA20DIT) here http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=2687550
Attached Images
 
arghx7 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to arghx7 For This Useful Post:
DocWalt (12-02-2015), freerunner (12-02-2015), KoolBRZ (12-03-2015), makinen (12-02-2015), sato (12-01-2015), steve99 (12-02-2015), thambu19 (12-01-2015)
Old 12-03-2015, 09:40 AM   #167
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thambu19 View Post
When you get a chance can you try something like this? At WOT I have gone 100% DI. This means you need to a degree or so more spark there to use the full potential. If you do not then it will feel sluggish compared to stock calibration.
Any one else notice the fuel trims go crazy after loading these tables? How are you guys dealing with it?

__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2015, 09:51 AM   #168
thambu19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 78 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by solidONE View Post
Any one else notice the fuel trims go crazy after loading these tables? How are you guys dealing with it?

Could it be because now engine is scavenging with pure air instead of air fuel mix

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
thambu19 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FR-S Gear Ratio Comparison SpeedR Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 36 02-25-2016 09:34 AM
Best pistons to use and Comp ratio? Fabron757 Forced Induction 36 02-05-2014 03:21 PM
Rear End Ratio White64Goat Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 6 07-07-2012 11:37 PM
FR-S to BRZ Ratio MannyO New England 11 03-08-2012 02:23 AM
86,BRZ MT gear ratio Yobiwan Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 1 01-26-2012 02:40 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.