follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook
Ft86Club
FT86CLUB.COM
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Scion FR-S Forum | Subaru BRZ Forum | Toyota 86 GT 86 Forum | AS1 Forum - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub

Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub Specific topics relating to wheels and tires.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-23-2012, 01:23 PM   #1
bazguitarman
$4,900 till FR-S
 
bazguitarman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 1999 Mazda Protege
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Question What return from going with lighter wheels?

What return would I expect from going with a lighter wheel to replace the factory FR-S wheels?

I am considering Enkei RPF1's in a 17"x7.5" +38 offset. These wheels weigh 15.2 lbs. according to TireRack. That's approximately 5 lbs less than the factory wheels.

What will this do for my car? How big of a change does reducing unsprung weight actually have on a car?
bazguitarman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 03:50 PM   #2
Khyron686
Senior Member
 
Khyron686's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2010 V6 Santa Fe, 2013 FR-S Blue
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 497
Thanks: 78
Thanked 112 Times in 65 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rule of thumb I've always heard is 4x the weight for unsprung. There's also maths for how far it's from the axle but meh.

So 5lbs a corner = 20lbs = same effect as removing 80lbs of body weight.
Khyron686 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Khyron686 For This Useful Post:
civicdrivr (05-23-2012), TPO (05-23-2012)
Old 05-23-2012, 04:05 PM   #3
civicdrivr
Lightness is a sickness
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 03 Acura CL-S6 & 13 Scion FR-S 6MT
Location: RVA
Posts: 1,990
Thanks: 2,838
Thanked 629 Times in 374 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
A pound saved in the wheel/tire is worth more then a pound saved elsewhere. Its rotating mass, you should notice a difference in acceleration, braking and steering.
__________________
2003 NBP Acura CL-S 6MT, very very sleepy, 1 of 480
2013 FR-S 6MT, Asphalt, First 86
civicdrivr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 04:07 PM   #4
DEnd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: anyone seen my steering wheel?
Location: Double Shoals, NC
Posts: 119
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bazguitarman View Post
What return would I expect from going with a lighter wheel to replace the factory FR-S wheels?

I am considering Enkei RPF1's in a 17"x7.5" +38 offset. These wheels weigh 15.2 lbs. according to TireRack. That's approximately 5 lbs less than the factory wheels.

What will this do for my car? How big of a change does reducing unsprung weight actually have on a car?
The general rule of thumb is that reducing rotating weight at the tires by 1 lb is about like reducing 2lbs of static weight. However there is a lot more to it than that... for instance 5 lbs removed from the tires themselves (combined) will have a greater effect than 5lbs removed from the driveshaft.

If we use this calculator http://robrobinette.com/et.htm a 2750 lb car with 200 flywheel hp has a 1/4 mile et of 14.70 seconds
If you reduce the weight of the car by say 40 lbs (5 lbs per corner = 20 lbs * 2 for our rule of thumb) to 2710 lbs then the 1/4 mile et is 14.63 seconds. It's about like having 3 extra horsepower, or approximatly 1.5% more on our fictious car. So for the lighter wheel you will see a bit quicker acceleration times, and a very slight increase in fuel mileage.

There are also handling characteristics that will become more apparent as well. Firstly lets make a few assumtions lets say we have a 2750 lb car with equal corner weights so 687.5 lbs per corner and our unsprung weight is 50 lbs per corner. Then our sprung to unsprung weight ratio is 13.75:1 What this number ultimately means is how much the chassis is upset by bumps. The higher the number is the less bumps will affect the chassis. If we then reduce our unsprung weight to 45 lbs per corner our ratio becomes 15.278:1. This means that not only is a bump less likely to throw off the car from its line but that there is also effectively more force available to push the tire back to the pavement (it's not actually that way but its a simple way to explain it). Also because there is less weight the damping becomes more effective. That can be a plus or a minus depending on how effective the damping was for the given conditions prior to the weight change, though more than likely it will be a plus as I don't know of any car that is perfectly damped.
DEnd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to DEnd For This Useful Post:
20valvewynn83 (08-08-2012), 86'd (05-23-2012), civicdrivr (05-23-2012), Guff (05-28-2012), kwood9000 (05-23-2012), Laika (05-24-2012), merlin2111 (05-23-2012), slaxx (05-24-2012), TPO (05-23-2012), YukiHachiRoku (05-24-2012)
Old 05-23-2012, 04:24 PM   #5
blur
ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
 
blur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: E36 5.7 V8
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 1,573
Thanks: 194
Thanked 193 Times in 110 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Basically, the engine has to work less to get the wheels up to speed. Therefore, you have better responsiveness in acceleration. The brakes also work less to bring the wheels to a stop. The OEM 86 wheels are very light; so I don't see the reason to shell out unless you go wider, which will help your lateral traction tremendously.
__________________
I wish I was cool enough to have an FR-S
blur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 04:27 PM   #6
Duff_man
Member
 
Duff_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Ultramarine FR-S
Location: Quebec
Posts: 84
Thanks: 5
Thanked 18 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blur View Post
Basically, the engine has to work less to get the wheels up to speed. Therefore, you have better responsiveness in acceleration. The brakes also work less to bring the wheels to a stop. The OEM 86 wheels are very light; so I don't see the reason to shell out unless you go wider, which will help your lateral traction tremendously.
21 pounds is not very light in my book. Enkei or OZ 15 pound wheels is what I call very light!
Duff_man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 04:57 PM   #7
industrial
Add lightness!
 
industrial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: Brz
Location: Boston
Posts: 664
Thanks: 226
Thanked 317 Times in 172 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Yeah 21 pounds for a 17x7 wheel is heavy. Not light at all. The lightest wheels in that size will be around 12-13 pounds which would be a substantial weight savings. I'm trying to see if I can find a set of Velox PG-5s around here...no luck so far. 12.5lbs for 17x7 though!
industrial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 05:01 PM   #8
Captain Snooze
Senior Member
 
Captain Snooze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Red Herring
Location: australia
Posts: 736
Thanks: 145
Thanked 213 Times in 139 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bazguitarman View Post

I am considering Enkei RPF1's in a 17"x7.5" +48 offset. These wheels weigh 15.2 lbs. according to TireRack. ?
fixed
Captain Snooze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 09:09 PM   #9
blur
ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
 
blur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: E36 5.7 V8
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 1,573
Thanks: 194
Thanked 193 Times in 110 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duff_man View Post
21 pounds is not very light in my book. Enkei or OZ 15 pound wheels is what I call very light!
Sorry about that, I was misinformed. The 16s weigh in at 17 lbs a piece though.

Motegi traklites are forged and the 17s weight 14 lbs. $250 a wheel.
__________________
I wish I was cool enough to have an FR-S
blur is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to blur For This Useful Post:
NYC BRZ (05-24-2012)
Old 05-24-2012, 04:10 AM   #10
bazguitarman
$4,900 till FR-S
 
bazguitarman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 1999 Mazda Protege
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thank you to everyone for the info.

Thank you DEnd for the very informative answer.

And thank you Captain Snooze for correcting my typo. That was way off.
bazguitarman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 10:55 AM   #11
Matt Andrews
Senior Member
 
Matt Andrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: race cars
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 247
Thanks: 31
Thanked 145 Times in 68 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
one thing that is being ignored here is how unsprung weight will effect the suspension. Think of how much more your arm has to work when you lift a dumbbell that is 25% heavier. Same goes for the springs and dampers on your car. heavier wheels keep the suspension from reacting as fast as it would with less weight simply because of the inertial forces of the increased weight.

on a similar chassis, (miata) 5 lbs in wheel weight IS butt dyno noticeable in both centrifical force related ways (accel, decel) as well as compression and rebound related ones (comfort, lateral grip, etc)
Matt Andrews is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Matt Andrews For This Useful Post:
civicdrivr (05-24-2012), Racecomp Engineering (05-24-2012)
Old 05-24-2012, 04:06 PM   #12
mechaghost
Senior Member
 
mechaghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Silver AT Limited
Location: Seattle
Posts: 706
Thanks: 126
Thanked 293 Times in 130 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
So from what I read are only upsides, no downsides to going lighter?
mechaghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 04:13 PM   #13
Lost
Senior Member
 
Lost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Carless...
Location: SC
Posts: 174
Thanks: 129
Thanked 40 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mechaghost View Post
So from what I read are only upsides, no downsides to going lighter?
Lighter wheels, depending on construction technique, may not be as durable as heavier wheels.
Lost is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lost For This Useful Post:
civicdrivr (05-25-2012)
Old 05-24-2012, 04:26 PM   #14
ubersoph
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 228
Thanks: 42
Thanked 38 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Lighter wheels make your wallet lighter.
ubersoph is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ubersoph For This Useful Post:
civicdrivr (05-25-2012), crash (05-25-2012), ft86Fan (05-31-2012), mechaghost (06-05-2012), MtnDrvr86 (05-24-2012)
Old 05-24-2012, 05:13 PM   #15
industrial
Add lightness!
 
industrial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: Brz
Location: Boston
Posts: 664
Thanks: 226
Thanked 317 Times in 172 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mechaghost View Post
So from what I read are only upsides, no downsides to going lighter?
There are pretty much no downsides to a nice set of lightweight racing wheels in a reasonable size and offset.
industrial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 08:34 AM   #16
Mitch
form follows function
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '95 M3, '07 Si, '13 BRZ
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 659
Thanks: 39
Thanked 193 Times in 104 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mechaghost View Post
So from what I read are only upsides, no downsides to going lighter?
Affordable, durable, light. Pick two, and be ready to be disappointed on one of those two.
Mitch is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 06:03 PM   #17
DEnd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: anyone seen my steering wheel?
Location: Double Shoals, NC
Posts: 119
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bazguitarman View Post
Thank you DEnd for the very informative answer.
One thing I should warn everyone on is that the sprung to unsprung ratios do not translate between different cars. Two cars can have the exact same ratios, and even with perfect damping can have vastly different behaviors when it comes to bumps in the road. Suspension design, weight placement, even drive configuration can all play very important parts in how the car behaves.

If you want to get really in-depth about how a vehicle behaves I suggest brushing up on your math and then reading
Race Car Vehicle Dynamics by Miliken and Miliken Race Car Vehicle Dynamics by Miliken and Miliken
.
DEnd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 06:43 PM   #18
TwinscrollGT35R
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2006 Subaru
Location: Southwest
Posts: 76
Thanks: 4
Thanked 30 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Now how many of you have used these???





These are off one of my motorcycles. Dropped 46lbs of unsprung weight. I'm a road racer, But I went to the drags once, No one could catch me in the 1st 60 ft.

On the track I had to change all my lines.
TwinscrollGT35R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 06:44 PM   #19
TwinscrollGT35R
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2006 Subaru
Location: Southwest
Posts: 76
Thanks: 4
Thanked 30 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
One other thing people get stuck on is light wheels, But then put cheap heavy tires on them.
TwinscrollGT35R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 07:58 PM   #20
Mitch
form follows function
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '95 M3, '07 Si, '13 BRZ
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 659
Thanks: 39
Thanked 193 Times in 104 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwinscrollGT35R View Post
Now how many of you have used these???





These are off one of my motorcycles. Dropped 46lbs of unsprung weight. I'm a road racer, But I went to the drags once, No one could catch me in the 1st 60 ft.

On the track I had to change all my lines.
Ducati?
Mitch is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 09:14 PM   #21
fastdrivingjr
Member
 
fastdrivingjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Ducati 749 / Ktm Smc lc4 supermoto
Location: Kennesaw GA
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
on my ducati i have light weight race wheels(all ducatis come with them) but not the best
..
now they get lighter yes, but the lighter you go the easier they are to get damaged.. and on public streets you will watch you wallet shrink after nailing through..

pot holes !!

so durable as someone mentioned might be neccesary if you plan to do alot of driving on public roads
fastdrivingjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 09:16 PM   #22
fastdrivingjr
Member
 
fastdrivingjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Ducati 749 / Ktm Smc lc4 supermoto
Location: Kennesaw GA
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwinscrollGT35R View Post
Now how many of you have used these???





These are off one of my motorcycles. Dropped 46lbs of unsprung weight. I'm a road racer, But I went to the drags once, No one could catch me in the 1st 60 ft.

On the track I had to change all my lines.

btw nice wheels look good on a paul smart..
fastdrivingjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Return of Datsun! Mr.Jay Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 65 03-28-2012 04:35 PM
Tiger Woods Announces Return To Sex Axel Off-Topic Lounge 4 02-25-2010 04:42 PM
FT-86 the return of the Celica? 1660 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 11 12-29-2009 09:58 AM
MR2 set to return as Prius coupé? Redline Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 37 12-08-2009 12:51 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.