View Single Post
Old 06-08-2016, 03:41 PM   #66
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by extrashaky View Post
Not as childish as continuing to pretend there's a mustache on a car when there clearly isn't.



I remember reading an article a while back about the Pontiac Aztec that said that in fact cars ARE designed to resemble faces in order to appeal to our affinity to animals used in former times as beasts of burden, so that we would become emotionally attached to our vehicles. That's the reason early steam vehicles gave way to a design that more closely follows a natural, four-legged animal design and why people were creeped out by design experiments like the "three-eyed" Tucker. The Aztec was a failure in large part because it didn't conform to that aesthetic, and as a result it looked "alien" or "mechanical." People looked at it and didn't recognize it. So they didn't buy it.

Furthermore, you can't tell me that those ridiculous Mazda front ends are not made to resemble a smiling face. That kind of foolishness doesn't happen by accident.
Bull. One of the best selling vehicles in history and no cute animal face there:



Not a huge difference really


__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote