View Single Post
Old 07-10-2012, 12:40 PM   #4
Lonewolf
Senior Member
 
Lonewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: Moped
Location: CA
Posts: 4,298
Thanks: 4,897
Thanked 2,128 Times in 1,193 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I am strongly opposed to this type of surveillance.

First, this is a test bed for what is to come. (Compulsory monitors in 10 years to get decent rates anyone?)

Second, let's say you need to pass a car blocking you in your lane, and you accelerate above the speed limit, just momentarily, to get around this other car. The insurance company sees that, and boom, higher rates!???

***I don't drive like a maniac, but I also don't drive like a grandma, so this would never be an option for me.
Lonewolf is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lonewolf For This Useful Post:
Fly Guy (07-10-2012), Tim_Asphalt_FRS (03-13-2013)