Thread: Frs vs s2000
View Single Post
Old 09-27-2013, 12:33 PM   #633
Anaxilus
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: They have four wheels
Location: United States
Posts: 482
Thanks: 59
Thanked 199 Times in 114 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
You said the 2000 model year S2000 was $40k. It wasn't. The most recent non-CR S2000 was $35k in 2009. The CR was a special model aimed at a very small segment of an already limited portion of the market, I don't know why you'd even compare it other than to try to exaggerate the expensiveness of the S2000.
Because when I was looking at roadsters in 2005, I remembered the S2000 approaching 40k while the MR-S was under 30k during cross shopping. Two very different price brackets in my mind. I'm not building a space rocket or cooking a Souffle here. If a 35-38k means it's a $30k car to you, then so be it. We won't agree. The 86 is not what I'd consider a $20K car. Nitpicking a couple grand isn't making any argument worth of note except as a red herring.

I used 2000 to accentuate the price difference between a car produced new in 2000 versus another new car produced in 2012. Use whatever figure makes you comfortable, the point is the same. The S2K was and is a much more expensive car to produce.

Now excuse me, I'm going to go back to the new Miata versus used Cayman S thread now. Thx guys.
Anaxilus is offline   Reply With Quote