View Single Post
Old 07-19-2014, 08:06 PM   #208
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesm View Post
Like all maps... the highest value is applied for any higher input value on each axis. i.e. '5200rpm' means '5200rpm or greater'. also of course you can rescale any way you wish.

Temperature compensations are one of the many things that subaru engineers probably did better than we can. They just shouldn't need to be messed with IMHO, and i've never been in a situation where i had to.
So values of 0.000 would be 100% DI, right?

Well, using the stock compensation table there was at least a +- 4~5% fuel trim variation in closed loop due to temperature in lower intake volume closed loop operation. I dialed in a maf scale at approximately 66~72f IAT's. When ran within that temp range fuel trim were below 2% in closed loop. Once the temperature gets higher the the fuel trim would change pretty proportionately to the amount of IAT increase leading me to believe the temp compensation needed to be adjusted.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote