View Single Post
Old 08-09-2013, 09:35 PM   #403
jcX4ever
X-Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2zz MRS
Location: USA
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jawnathin View Post
. The rotary is a good example of a case where both its HP/L and volume or weight/hp were good (and even remarkable) but had issues elsewhere which were compromises.
Your whole point is good but your example is wrong. The Rotary engine 3 phase/stage/cycle which are the Intake, compression/ignition and Exhaust. If they say 1.3L displacement, it is not. It is actually 1.3L x 3 = 3.9L (at least arguably).. The 3 phase/stage/cycle happens all at the same time. Unlike in a regular engine, it will only be doing 1 phase/stage/cycle at a time.

So a 3.9L making 255hp is OK but not the greatest.

TL;DR.. a displacement in Rotary/wankel engine does not equate or reperesent the regular 4 stroke engine displacement.. (at least arguably)
jcX4ever is offline