View Single Post
Old 10-25-2012, 02:47 PM   #89
madfast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2010 Evo X MR-T
Location: NY
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by st0k3d View Post
You should do actual research, there can be many instances where a turbocharger will beat out supercharger kits power curves.

Supercharger kits are super linear versus a properly setup turbo can make power almost immediately and hold it there to redline.

So if you want to make power as early as possible, many times a proper turbo setup is the way to go.

Look at S2000 supercharger dyno plots for examples, I feel this is a good comparison to the FA20 motor in terms of power delivery and torque production.

I am not saying this is definitely what is going to happen with this engine, but to use blanket statements is wrong.

fwiw it looks like those dynos come from ultimate racing themselves so its not exactly an unbiased, third party comparison...

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreshFRS View Post
this! check out this website. http://www.boefabrication.com/index....-supercharging compare a 2ZZ supercharged out of a lotus elise with the above s2000 supercharged dyno, that would be a better comparison to show how power and torque are made with positive displacement superchargers
imo, if you're ok with "modest" gains, then SC is the way to go... if you want 500 hp, go straight to turbo. in between is the centrifugal SC, which can either be seen as the "odd man out", or the perfect compromise...
madfast is offline