Thread: Frs vs s2000
View Single Post
Old 09-27-2013, 01:41 AM   #621
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anaxilus View Post
Parking a S2000 next to a MR2 certainly gives that impression. Especially being 600lbs lighter w/ more legroom and the engine behind your head.

That's why I said for a roadster. The 86 is a GT coupe and makes the rest of the class out there look like SUVs.

Personally I could give a rat's ass about stock power. You can make power in any car, that's the least on my worries when buying a car unless I'm not a wrench turner.

Never said the S2000 is a bad car. I just dispute that it is a "better car in all respects" to the 86 which cost 35% less brand new. How much more love would the 86 get by 'enthusiasts' if it came w/ sticky 255 rubber in the back like the S2000 CR?

Plus which S2000 are we talking about? The $35K 2900lb model or the $38k CR at 2750lb.
It wouldn't. It would just make the car slower.

I own a CR. The 86's weak points are VERY painfully obvious to me after just 8 months of tracking one.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote