View Single Post
Old 10-03-2018, 04:50 PM   #7
daiheadjai
Senior Member
 
daiheadjai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2003 S2000, 2008 Fit
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,990
Thanks: 2,584
Thanked 1,154 Times in 688 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by weederr33 View Post
Hijacker!!!
Kidding aside, I believe the reason the torque dip is on the twins and not other Subaru cars is because the twins have both port and direct injection. While the WRX, for example, only has direct injection. I'm sure the turbo also masks any lag. But again, in the WRX realm, they have rev hang which is a byproduct of emissions regulation. Then again, I'm not an engineer, I'm just going off what I've read and heard.
Several others have also pointed out that the Cayman (I think it was a Cayman) also has a similar dip, albeit less-pronounced (or perhaps less an issue due to higher power/torque), suggesting it might be an engine characteristic.

Others have mentioned/explained that the dip is what allows the FA20 to provide reasonable low-end torque (i.e. below 4k rpm) for city driving, while still managing 200hp from a 2.0L NA.

Torque dip pairs well with spinning doritos.
daiheadjai is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to daiheadjai For This Useful Post:
RallySport (10-27-2018)