View Single Post
Old 08-17-2018, 04:39 PM   #39
freerunner
Senior Member
 
freerunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Thanks: 135
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
It's difficult for me to explain, but I'll try:



The trick is to fill the "CAL"-row with numbers to increase or decrease the slope of the new maf curve. It does not need to exactly match the pre-calibrated maf curve - so if there are "hills" and "valleys", you just try to adjust the new curve to go through the middle of it, with the least possible amount of corrections in the CAL-row.
The ECU will compensate with STFT+LTFT in these regions.

No reason to freak out about fuel-trims.

Just the area around 3V should be treated with care, we don't want much interfering from the ECU here, because the final fuel trim throws off the open-loop scale.
edit: I try to get around +/- 0.5% difference to the vgitool-calibrated data here (coloured "red" in the spreadsheet).
freerunner is offline   Reply With Quote