Thread: Frs vs s2000
View Single Post
Old 09-27-2013, 01:06 PM   #635
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,794
Thanks: 2,164
Thanked 4,242 Times in 2,220 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
I'd break it down like this.

- The S2k has a power advantage at certain speeds. 20-85, 125+ Between 90 and 120, it's a wash. This is due to the BRZ's inherant "slipperyness" (it's more aerodynamic).

- The BRZ has much better aerodynamic balance stock, compared to the S2k. The S2k makes a ton of rear lift, and a good amount of front downforce, stock, whereas the BRZ is zero lift (with factory aero). This is also why the BRZ gives the S2k such a good fight on mid-speed tracks, but it's also why the S2k simply decimates the BRZ once aero is added (just a rear wing).

- Coupe... well... if there was one, I'd have one, but I suppose that's why I have an OEM hardtop. Surprisingly, I discovered that going topless is pretty fcking awesome. I would have never though I'd like a topless car before I tried it.
Nice write-up. A couple of my good friends used to own convertibles (S2000, Miatas). On the right days, top-down motoring was awesome. I can only imagine how nice a convertible would be out in gorgeous southern Cal.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote