View Single Post
Old 07-16-2014, 06:49 PM   #50
jamesm
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,929
Thanks: 1,166
Thanked 2,293 Times in 1,180 Posts
Mentioned: 313 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiv@Openflash View Post
No. The intention was to implement a load cut. This protects against wastegate failure or any other condition that would cause an overboost.

As an aside, the Denso logic makes this quite effective since engine load isn't just a raw MAF value but rather an engine speed (/rev) corrected load variable. So adding a breakpoint just above the desired engine load and then another one just above that and mapping in substantial ignition retard does the job very well. Arguably better than a rather simple MAP induced cut which is oblivious to any thing that would change engine VE and result in a condition where the ECU sees same nominal MAP value with vastly different engine load.
Gotcha.
jamesm is offline