View Single Post
Old 10-10-2017, 12:00 PM   #440
DaWorstPlaya
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2016 FR-S
Location: Denver
Posts: 68
Thanks: 48
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I would say the course was high speed sweeper and high speed transition heavy that's why the FRS performed better than normal and the Focus RS appeared much worse. Also the fact that the Focus RS wasn't launched hard which is usually worth 0.5sec. Course design always has an effect on results. Sorry but IMHO, the test course used was not a good indicator of the true performance potential of the cars. The Focus RS is not a DS car.

Also factor the length of the course, which was short. National courses are usually twice as long, which means multiply the time difference by a factor of 2. The courses at Nationals and our local courses generally favor power/acceleration more. This years courses were turn around and flat out acceleration. The west course gave you the illusion of slaloms but if you lined up correctly they were flat out. Kinda changes the picture, IMHO.
DaWorstPlaya is offline   Reply With Quote