|
So for those of you guys comparing this to a Cayman, I think it's possible that this is actually in a performance territory in line with the Cayman S, not a base Cayman...that's just based on numbers. Without anyone with seat time it's a moot point, but for power to weight figures the 4c is waaaaay better. With an 1800lb dry weight (2000lb est. curb weight) and an estimated 270BHP engine (7.4lbs/hp), this looks a hell of a lot better than the Cayman's 2932lb curb weight and 275BHP(10.7lbs/hp). The Cayman S rings in at 2910lbs and 325BHP (8.9lbs/hp). Then take into account the 4c is a carbon monocoque chassis with aluminum subframes (like a real supercar) vs. the Cayman's aluminum spaceframe. It's gonna be really interesting when the 4c comes out because it's gonna be either really good or fall on its face, needless to say the fact that a car with a carbon monocoque chassis is even remotely affordable will send waves through the industry.
Think about it, CF monocoque is safer than metal, lighter, and stronger. It will help cars shed weight and increase fuel economy. Lower HP engines will be able to be used to hit performance numbers reserved for the true exotics. It's really exciting to be honest!
|