View Single Post
Old 08-01-2017, 06:43 PM   #37
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 554 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by solidONE View Post
Was the Stage 1 ignition timing really that much more conservative? Looks pretty close (roughly +1.3* past 6800rpm on the STG 2) in terms of the amount of ignition advance when the throttle is pinned. While not really a fair comparison, stock header vs catless UEL , between these 2 logs the one with more kc activity was with hotter oil temps. Neither logs had kc exceeding -1.5* at any point.

Zoomed in in the Nür/STG 2 log (110*C oil, 29*C IAT):
http://datazap.me/u/tor/track-0?log=...5987-5993-6000

Zoomed in on the meppen/STG 1 log (99*C oil, 26*C IAT):
http://datazap.me/u/tor/track-logs?l...5756-5742-5727
They are both stg 1. These two logs are the same tune and stock header on different tracks. What I meant was that I ran more conservative timing when I was still on the stock header. I.e. I tuned for no FLKC on street. The one with more FLKC was the one with higher speeds/gears (and yes oil temp too). Though I think the higher gears are the reason for the more FLKC which is what I wanted to point out with these two logs as a comparison (the Meppen log mainly FLKC at lowish rpm).

With the stg 2 tune I run now, I accept some FLKC on street and subsequently have a lot more FLKC when tracking (that one time so far this year):
http://datazap.me/u/tor/tor-2141-track-logs
(now 15+ tune revisions ago)
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tor For This Useful Post:
solidONE (08-01-2017)