View Single Post
Old 05-22-2017, 02:25 PM   #12
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 554 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
Updated my Calibration tool to v1.22 - only some minor formula changes.

Added the MAF Shaping Tool to the OP. Credit to 86Inches on Romraider for this one. Added my own touch for users here to make it a bit easier to use. Designed for giving the MAF a true curve, I have used the tool and it works nicely. Here is the original thread on Romraider, users have reported a smoother car due to correct interpolation of the MAF so I recommend giving this a go.
I tried this out today. Zeroed out the IAT compensation, flashed and went for a 1 hour CL focused drive and collected this data. In between, I did 4 WOT pulls.


Stuffed it through VGI's tool (chose the least correction at 2.9v from OL and CL scaling) and put the output unedited into your version of 86Inches smoothing tool.

I attached my excel sheet with my data and wanted to ask, if you have the time, if you would please take a look at it and see if the way I used the tool makes sense?

In the comparison line, I filled in the MAF scaled that I used to collect the data. The result I end up with is very close.
Attached Files
File Type: zip MAF Shaping Tool-Tor 2.17.xlsx.zip (56.7 KB, 235 views)
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tor For This Useful Post:
Vin (05-22-2017)