View Single Post
Old 10-01-2014, 04:17 PM   #713
tomaszjanczak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: Silver Subaru BRZ
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 204
Thanks: 23
Thanked 78 Times in 49 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by milhouse View Post
Can anyone clarify two points for me?
  • If I am running 93/94 but with 10% Ethanol (screw you, Iowa), should I run the 91 or 93 stg 1 tune?
  • If I have a 2.5" Perrin Intake, should I use the Perrin-provided MAF scaling (as I did when running 1.59), or does @Shiv@Openflash's substantial modifications to the MAF scaling in 2.X mean I should use the defaults?
  • No matter what the answer is above, its still a good ideea to do manual MAF scaling to tweak the above values?

Thanks
Sorry don't have much experience with the MAF scaling but for your first question, I got a lot of knock running the 93 oct stage 1 tune with 93 octane fuel (also 10% ethanol). Now I am running 91oct tune with 93 oct fuel and have no problems with knock and honestly, the car feels much faster and smoother on the 91oct tune. The easiest solution would be to just data log using the 93 tune and see if it knocks because if you use the 94 fuel, that might be good enough.
tomaszjanczak is offline   Reply With Quote