View Single Post
Old 03-12-2014, 07:35 PM   #3904
Xero-Limit
 
Xero-Limit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: JDL Turbo FRS, 335SC BRZ (ret)
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 938
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,550 Times in 527 Posts
Mentioned: 380 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
*** EDIT: Problem solved. Use stock MAP sensor. ***

So for comparison purposes, here's the intercooled vs nonintercooled run. Best intercooled took hours on the dyno, best non-intercooled was our OTS tune with e65 (phloozy) above. Both on ethanol running pretty much the same advance, cam timing, and di timings. Both Raceseng 70mm pulleys.

My conclusion, for the time being, is that the intercooler hinders flow too much for the smaller pulleys. The problem is a maximum HP output issue. The charge air becomes incredibly unstable with that laminova core.

We tried the following over 50+ dyno pulls and two gas tanks on the road covering a hundred flashes.

FULL cam sweep in both directions
DI/PI ratios 100-0-100 in both directions
DI timings covering a full sweep that is physically possible, to the point of misfiring on both extremes.
AFR from 11:1 to 13.5:1. Best power above was on the leaner end.
Stock and aftermarket injectors.
Ignition timing is not a factor.
What we though were bad coils are not, no misfires on the latest tunes.

So there you have it. We'll keep working on this to see what else might be playing a role.

Now, does anyone have dynojet numbers of an intercooled setup that does differently?

As much as us tuners compete, I have been surprised by the consensus with our dyno findings. Oddly enough we hypothesized this would be an issue months back....
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Xero-Limit; 03-13-2014 at 02:58 PM.
Xero-Limit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Xero-Limit For This Useful Post:
Calum (03-12-2014), Drift-Office (03-13-2014), sw20kosh (03-12-2014), Toyota86.ir (02-27-2016)