Two reviews of the 2015 up - handling differences noted
 

Both Autoguide and Autoweek have just posted reviews of the 2015 FR-S - some journos were invited out to the Streets of Willow for a run. They were allowed to drive the '14 and '15 back to back to clarify the changes made to the handling, which they report being quite noticeable. It looks like the '15 has been tuned to be closer to the BRZ setup, giving less mid-corner oversteer and more overall neutrality, with initial understeer being more evident.

Glad I got a 2014, didn't want another under steering car like my old FWD CRX Si...

Sounds like nothing but good changes imo. Unless drifting around every corner in your subdivision was your thing.

What was the actual change? couple of bolts?

Correct, bigger bolts

They also changed the spring rates in the front and there are different shocks/struts.

This talk of "drastic" handling differences worries me. I'd be fine with slight changes, but anything more than that and I doubt I'd like it.

Personally I always felt the FR-S balance was spot on from the factory. The car was playful on the street with stock all-season Turanzas. And with stickier summer tires, the balance feels really good on the track.


Different damping as well, from what I understand.

Firmer front springs, different brand of dampers, changed bolts in the front. Sounds like they made it less driftable.

Could be they are seeing consumers moving to the Subaru more or just that they are being conservative again as Toyota usually is. Might be a better calibration for people adding FI for stability and for a fastest lap time perspective.

I still enjoy the playfulness of my ‘13 at its current power level.

On initial release of the twins I think Toyota chose the slight oversteering bias to emphasize the novelty and uniqueness in the market of a non-understeering vehicle. Now the model was due for a mid cycle refresh and this is what was settled on by committee.

I predict the original FR-S will hold a place similar to the original Mata as far as longterm desirability.

Everyone is just gunna drop it on coils anyway who gives a fuck

It is.

And isn't that the point of this car? It's supposed to be a bit loose and crazy. It was designed to be fun, and the excessive tail-happiness is part of that. I'm sure the 2015 can get faster lap times than the 2013, but is it coming at the cost of making this a more civilized, less silly car? If there's one thing I've learned from racing, it's that the fastest lap times feel the slowest.

If I want the best lap times, I'd get a Porsche or a Miata. If I want a fun everyday car that's still very competent on the track or autocross, I'll pick the FRS.

Yup. Those who are just going to use it as a street car probably couldn't care less. Those that need it for more are gonna change to coilovers anyway.

Two reviews of the 2015 up - handling differences noted
 

I actually don't know what to make of these changes. Seems like they're trying to dial out what brought us all here. IDK, some ppl will love the new and others will covet the old. Time will only tell how these model years will be regarded by enthusiasts.

What brought me here was a functional trackable street car. OEM decent handling. Relative light weight. RWD. Functional interior (fold flat seats) for going to track.

In fact I think I searched something like "4cyl rwd coupe fold flat seats" before this car was released and brought me to the concept.

Being sideways on every roundabout was not on my priority list.

95% of the owners of this car wont be able to tell the difference as the changes are mostly noticable at the limit.