strat61caster |
05-30-2019 08:42 PM |
Drive car hard, replace tires often, 17" tires cheaper than 18" tires, 17x9 is a standard wheel sizing for 245/40/17 (driven by SCCA and TT rulesets, trickle down effect from people copying fast guys in those realms), that tire works on an 8.5" wheel just fine. Go down to a 17x8 for a cheaper 225/45/17 tire, but I think that'd be too stretched on an 8.5" wheel, it'll work, just preferences. 17" wheels are usually cheaper than 18's too. 235's aren't common to split the difference, especially in fast tire compounds, uncommon tire = expensive tire.
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-rek07
(Post 3223149)
I've never heard of going up in wheel size and lower in tire profile as offering any performance advantage. Also, they don't offer 17x9 wheels?
|
It is less of an issue this decade, pushing for larger diameter wheels offered a lot of performance advantages in the past, it wasn't so long ago that 14" was a 'sporty' wheel (the Miata came on 14" wheels up to the launch of the NB when they were replaced with 15's, the AP1 S2000 had 16's) but we're in a sweet spot right now with most cars offering/accepting 17"-19" wheel options that work great.
Shorter stiffer sidewalls respond faster and more consistently, I believe back in the day before radials were common the lower profiles offered better stability at high speeds. Larger wheels also mean more space for larger brakes which in the early days of discs meant more thermal capacity, stop better = faster laptime.
There's a balance to strike, the car was designed around a 17" wheel with a ~24.7" diameter tire, messing with that formula may make the car feel 'off' as now the bushings, suspension, and chassis are working harder to compensate for the reduced tire flex. It could be worth it if you're going down the well of making your car faster but it sounds like you're just getting started so stick with the 17's imho, spend the money on seat time.
|