Oops.. sorry.. I will remove it for now. :thumbsup:

http://www.coolstorybro.co/image/121...-bro-image.gif

The FRS is 69.9 in. wide and the S2000 is 68.9 in. wide.. and 0.6 taller than the S2000...

But you forgot the most important one of all. Misinformation!

Damn dude, it's not that serious. I said thanks for the correction.

No need to get all worked up.:mad0259:

The thing is that you saw it from behind, and it is as wide as a "regular" car. It is also as long as a "regular" coupe. You will find it small when you look from the side. It is short (as in height). That's the dimension that makes it look small.

lololol its pretty small i dunno what the O.P talking about....:barf:

..you're right, wide wheels in the rear helps with the stance.

Way to bump a year old thread. :party0030:

Better than them starting a new one on the same subject I suppose.


Perspective is a weird thing. When I saw my first FR-S from behind on the interstate (after buying mine) it took me a bit to work out I was looking at the same car. It looked wider than I expected.

Today someone in my office building snapped a pic of my car in a funeral procession and it actually struck me as looking different in the context of a daily drive. In a good way ;-)

http://i.imgur.com/hLByAcR.jpg

lol. I'm like "what the heck am I reading" lol

I like the fact that it looks kind of wide. Gives it a sort of "presence" on the road, at least that's what I'm thinking when I see another one in motion.

The first time I took it out with a friend along for the ride she claimed it felt wide riding in it, and actually on a skinny road it does seem to sit pretty close to the lines. I love the way this car looks from behind and actually my favorite angle is looking directly at either rear quarter panel. That line over the wheel wells is pure sex.

lol